4215:肺癌筛查检查阳性患者及筛查特征相关

L. Henderson, S. Sites, T. Tailor, S. C. Bearden, R. Huamani, A. Throneburg, Max Nagle, M. Rivera
{"title":"4215:肺癌筛查检查阳性患者及筛查特征相关","authors":"L. Henderson, S. Sites, T. Tailor, S. C. Bearden, R. Huamani, A. Throneburg, Max Nagle, M. Rivera","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-4215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The likelihood of having a positive low dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) examination that requires workup may vary according to patients’ characteristics and risk factors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics associated with positive LCS exams. Methods. We utilized data from 1684 LDCT exams conducted for LCS at five academic and community sites from 2015-2018. During the screening visit, patients were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire including socio-demographics, smoking history, occupational and environmental exposures, family history of lung cancer, and comorbid conditions. Information on the LCS examination, including the radiologists’ Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) assessment, was obtained from the radiologist report. We dichotomized Lung-RADS into negative (Lung-RADS 1 (negative) or 2 (benign appearance or behavior)) and positive (Lung-RADS 3 (probably benign), 4A (suspicious), or 4B (suspicious)) based on the management recommendation of continuing with annual screening in 12 months or requiring follow-up before 12 months. We compared Lung-RADS results (positive versus negative) by patient characteristics using chi-square tests and examined predictors of positive LCS exams using multivariate logistic regression, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results. Screened patients ranged in age from 50-78 years, with 46.7% less than 65 years and 53.3% ages 65 or older. Approximately 53.3% were male and 46.7% were female; 84.5% were White, 11.8% were African American, and 3.7% were other races. The majority (76.5%) of screened patients were overweight or obese. Two-thirds (68.5%) of patients had more than one LCS exam. Most (85.0%) LCS exams were negative while 15.0% were positive. There were no significant differences in Lung-RADS assessment by race, gender, education, or body mass index. Lung-RADS were significantly more likely to be positive in those ages 65 and older versus those ages less than 65 (aOR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.03-2.10) and in baseline versus subsequent screening exams (aOR=0.43, 95%CI: 0.30-0.62). Conclusion. Predictors of having a positive LCS exam requiring work-up before the next recommended annual screening test include being aged 65 and older and having a baseline LCS examination. Citation Format: Louise M. Henderson, Samantha Sites, Tina Tailor, Sara C. Bearden, Roger Huamani, Allison Throneburg, Max Nagle, M Patricia Rivera. Patient and screening characteristics associated with positive lung cancer screening examinations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4215.","PeriodicalId":20357,"journal":{"name":"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception","volume":"290 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract 4215: Patient and screening characteristics associated with positive lung cancer screening examinations\",\"authors\":\"L. Henderson, S. Sites, T. Tailor, S. C. Bearden, R. Huamani, A. Throneburg, Max Nagle, M. Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-4215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The likelihood of having a positive low dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) examination that requires workup may vary according to patients’ characteristics and risk factors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics associated with positive LCS exams. Methods. We utilized data from 1684 LDCT exams conducted for LCS at five academic and community sites from 2015-2018. During the screening visit, patients were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire including socio-demographics, smoking history, occupational and environmental exposures, family history of lung cancer, and comorbid conditions. Information on the LCS examination, including the radiologists’ Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) assessment, was obtained from the radiologist report. We dichotomized Lung-RADS into negative (Lung-RADS 1 (negative) or 2 (benign appearance or behavior)) and positive (Lung-RADS 3 (probably benign), 4A (suspicious), or 4B (suspicious)) based on the management recommendation of continuing with annual screening in 12 months or requiring follow-up before 12 months. We compared Lung-RADS results (positive versus negative) by patient characteristics using chi-square tests and examined predictors of positive LCS exams using multivariate logistic regression, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results. Screened patients ranged in age from 50-78 years, with 46.7% less than 65 years and 53.3% ages 65 or older. Approximately 53.3% were male and 46.7% were female; 84.5% were White, 11.8% were African American, and 3.7% were other races. The majority (76.5%) of screened patients were overweight or obese. Two-thirds (68.5%) of patients had more than one LCS exam. Most (85.0%) LCS exams were negative while 15.0% were positive. There were no significant differences in Lung-RADS assessment by race, gender, education, or body mass index. Lung-RADS were significantly more likely to be positive in those ages 65 and older versus those ages less than 65 (aOR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.03-2.10) and in baseline versus subsequent screening exams (aOR=0.43, 95%CI: 0.30-0.62). Conclusion. Predictors of having a positive LCS exam requiring work-up before the next recommended annual screening test include being aged 65 and older and having a baseline LCS examination. Citation Format: Louise M. Henderson, Samantha Sites, Tina Tailor, Sara C. Bearden, Roger Huamani, Allison Throneburg, Max Nagle, M Patricia Rivera. Patient and screening characteristics associated with positive lung cancer screening examinations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4215.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception\",\"volume\":\"290 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-4215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-4215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。需要检查的低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)肺癌筛查(LCS)阳性的可能性可能因患者的特征和危险因素而异。本研究的目的是评估与LCS检查阳性相关的患者特征。方法。我们利用了2015-2018年在五个学术和社区站点进行的LCS的1684次LDCT考试的数据。在筛查访问期间,患者被要求完成一份全面的调查问卷,包括社会人口统计学、吸烟史、职业和环境暴露、肺癌家族史和合并症。有关LCS检查的资料,包括放射科医生的肺部报告和数据系统(Lung- rads)评估,均来自放射科医生的报告。我们将肺- rads分为阴性(肺- rads 1(阴性)或2(良性外观或行为))和阳性(肺- rads 3(可能良性),4A(可疑)或4B(可疑))基于管理层建议继续在12个月内进行年度筛查或要求在12个月内随访。我们使用卡方检验比较肺- rads结果(阳性与阴性)的患者特征,并使用多变量逻辑回归检验LCS阳性的预测因子,报告调整优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(95% ci)。结果。筛查的患者年龄在50-78岁之间,46.7%的患者小于65岁,53.3%的患者年龄在65岁或以上。男性占53.3%,女性占46.7%;84.5%是白人,11.8%是非裔美国人,3.7%是其他种族。大多数(76.5%)筛查患者超重或肥胖。三分之二(68.5%)的患者进行了一次以上的LCS检查。LCS检查阴性者占85.0%,阳性者占15.0%。在肺- rads评估中,种族、性别、教育程度或体重指数没有显著差异。肺rads在65岁及以上的人群中呈阳性的可能性明显高于65岁以下的人群(aOR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.03-2.10),在基线与随后的筛查检查中(aOR=0.43, 95%CI: 0.30-0.62)。结论。在下一次推荐的年度筛查检查之前,LCS检查呈阳性的预测因素包括65岁及以上,并进行基线LCS检查。引文格式:Louise M. Henderson, Samantha Sites, Tina Tailor, Sara C. Bearden, Roger Huamani, Allison Throneburg, Max Nagle, M Patricia Rivera。肺癌筛查检查阳性的患者及筛查特征[摘要]。摘自:2019年美国癌症研究协会年会论文集;2019年3月29日至4月3日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(13增刊):4215。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract 4215: Patient and screening characteristics associated with positive lung cancer screening examinations
Introduction. The likelihood of having a positive low dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) examination that requires workup may vary according to patients’ characteristics and risk factors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics associated with positive LCS exams. Methods. We utilized data from 1684 LDCT exams conducted for LCS at five academic and community sites from 2015-2018. During the screening visit, patients were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire including socio-demographics, smoking history, occupational and environmental exposures, family history of lung cancer, and comorbid conditions. Information on the LCS examination, including the radiologists’ Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) assessment, was obtained from the radiologist report. We dichotomized Lung-RADS into negative (Lung-RADS 1 (negative) or 2 (benign appearance or behavior)) and positive (Lung-RADS 3 (probably benign), 4A (suspicious), or 4B (suspicious)) based on the management recommendation of continuing with annual screening in 12 months or requiring follow-up before 12 months. We compared Lung-RADS results (positive versus negative) by patient characteristics using chi-square tests and examined predictors of positive LCS exams using multivariate logistic regression, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results. Screened patients ranged in age from 50-78 years, with 46.7% less than 65 years and 53.3% ages 65 or older. Approximately 53.3% were male and 46.7% were female; 84.5% were White, 11.8% were African American, and 3.7% were other races. The majority (76.5%) of screened patients were overweight or obese. Two-thirds (68.5%) of patients had more than one LCS exam. Most (85.0%) LCS exams were negative while 15.0% were positive. There were no significant differences in Lung-RADS assessment by race, gender, education, or body mass index. Lung-RADS were significantly more likely to be positive in those ages 65 and older versus those ages less than 65 (aOR=1.47, 95%CI: 1.03-2.10) and in baseline versus subsequent screening exams (aOR=0.43, 95%CI: 0.30-0.62). Conclusion. Predictors of having a positive LCS exam requiring work-up before the next recommended annual screening test include being aged 65 and older and having a baseline LCS examination. Citation Format: Louise M. Henderson, Samantha Sites, Tina Tailor, Sara C. Bearden, Roger Huamani, Allison Throneburg, Max Nagle, M Patricia Rivera. Patient and screening characteristics associated with positive lung cancer screening examinations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4215.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信