{"title":"“美丽是什么”:珍·伯文的不合时宜的十四行诗","authors":"T. Altman","doi":"10.1353/elh.2022.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines the historical and material relationship between William Shakespeare's Sonnets and Jen Bervin's Nets (2004), an unusual edition of Shakespeare's sequence. Nets emerges from the avant-garde tradition of erasure poetics, yet it relies on and revives the temporal and material complexities of early modern textual practices. Further, it articulates its own position within literary history in distinctly Shakespearean terms, as a hinge between pre-modern and modern poetics. This essay argues that Nets both is and is not an early-modern object. It articulates a chiastic repetition of the Sonnets: repeating the past yet sustaining its difference.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"16 1","pages":"489 - 522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"What Beauty Was\\\": Jen Bervin's Untimely Sonnets\",\"authors\":\"T. Altman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/elh.2022.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay examines the historical and material relationship between William Shakespeare's Sonnets and Jen Bervin's Nets (2004), an unusual edition of Shakespeare's sequence. Nets emerges from the avant-garde tradition of erasure poetics, yet it relies on and revives the temporal and material complexities of early modern textual practices. Further, it articulates its own position within literary history in distinctly Shakespearean terms, as a hinge between pre-modern and modern poetics. This essay argues that Nets both is and is not an early-modern object. It articulates a chiastic repetition of the Sonnets: repeating the past yet sustaining its difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELH\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"489 - 522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0018\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2022.0018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:This essay examines the historical and material relationship between William Shakespeare's Sonnets and Jen Bervin's Nets (2004), an unusual edition of Shakespeare's sequence. Nets emerges from the avant-garde tradition of erasure poetics, yet it relies on and revives the temporal and material complexities of early modern textual practices. Further, it articulates its own position within literary history in distinctly Shakespearean terms, as a hinge between pre-modern and modern poetics. This essay argues that Nets both is and is not an early-modern object. It articulates a chiastic repetition of the Sonnets: repeating the past yet sustaining its difference.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
