多重喷射策略下柴油机螺线管喷油器喷射速率的表征:喷射动量与博世管方法的比较

IF 2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Bassam S. E. Aljohani, Moez Ben Houidi, Jian-ying Du, Aibolat Dyuisenakhmetov, B. Mohan, Abdullah S. AlRamadan, W. Roberts
{"title":"多重喷射策略下柴油机螺线管喷油器喷射速率的表征:喷射动量与博世管方法的比较","authors":"Bassam S. E. Aljohani, Moez Ben Houidi, Jian-ying Du, Aibolat Dyuisenakhmetov, B. Mohan, Abdullah S. AlRamadan, W. Roberts","doi":"10.3389/fmech.2022.889255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple injection strategies can be used for controlling the heat release rate in an engine, particularly in compression ignition engines. This can mitigate the heat transfer losses and overcome the limitation related to the maximum pressure allowed for a particular engine. Controlling heat release with repetitive injections requires precise characterization of the fuel injection rates. In such a configuration, the injector used should be characterized for its hydraulic delay, rate of injection, and the effect of dwell timing with multiple injections. This study investigates the fuel injection behavior of a high-flow-rate solenoid injector operated with single and double injections. Two characterization methods, the momentum flux, and the Bosch tube are used and compared to investigate their suitability with the multiple injection strategies. Experiments with single injection are conducted by varying the Energizing Timing (ET) from 0.5 up to 2 ms. The tests with multiple injections (i.e., double injections) are conducted with a fixed ET of 0.5 ms, while the dwell times (δt) are varied from 0.1 up to 1 ms. All tests are performed at 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 bar rail pressures. Depending on the injection pressure, the injector’s needle could not fully close with short dwell times and the injections are merged. The momentum flux method has faster ramp-up and decaying and more oscillations in the quasi-steady-state phase compared to the Bosch tube method. The effective duration of injection is overpredicted with the Bosch tube method. The momentum flux method is demonstrated to be more suitable for measuring the ROI of multiple injection strategies.","PeriodicalId":53220,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","volume":"320 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of the Rate of Injection of Diesel Solenoid Injectors Operated in the Multiple Injection Strategy: A Comparison of the Spray Momentum and Bosch Tube Methods\",\"authors\":\"Bassam S. E. Aljohani, Moez Ben Houidi, Jian-ying Du, Aibolat Dyuisenakhmetov, B. Mohan, Abdullah S. AlRamadan, W. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmech.2022.889255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple injection strategies can be used for controlling the heat release rate in an engine, particularly in compression ignition engines. This can mitigate the heat transfer losses and overcome the limitation related to the maximum pressure allowed for a particular engine. Controlling heat release with repetitive injections requires precise characterization of the fuel injection rates. In such a configuration, the injector used should be characterized for its hydraulic delay, rate of injection, and the effect of dwell timing with multiple injections. This study investigates the fuel injection behavior of a high-flow-rate solenoid injector operated with single and double injections. Two characterization methods, the momentum flux, and the Bosch tube are used and compared to investigate their suitability with the multiple injection strategies. Experiments with single injection are conducted by varying the Energizing Timing (ET) from 0.5 up to 2 ms. The tests with multiple injections (i.e., double injections) are conducted with a fixed ET of 0.5 ms, while the dwell times (δt) are varied from 0.1 up to 1 ms. All tests are performed at 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 bar rail pressures. Depending on the injection pressure, the injector’s needle could not fully close with short dwell times and the injections are merged. The momentum flux method has faster ramp-up and decaying and more oscillations in the quasi-steady-state phase compared to the Bosch tube method. The effective duration of injection is overpredicted with the Bosch tube method. The momentum flux method is demonstrated to be more suitable for measuring the ROI of multiple injection strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2022.889255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2022.889255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

多种喷射策略可用于控制发动机的热释放率,特别是在压缩点火发动机中。这可以减轻传热损失,并克服与特定发动机允许的最大压力有关的限制。通过重复喷射控制热量释放需要精确表征燃油喷射速率。在这种配置中,所使用的注入器应具有液压延迟、注入速度和多次注入时停留时间的影响等特征。本文研究了单喷和双喷两种大流量电磁喷油器的燃油喷射行为。采用了动量通量和博世管两种表征方法,并对其与多种注射策略的适用性进行了比较。单次注入实验通过改变激励时间(ET)从0.5到2ms进行。多次注射(即两次注射)的测试以固定的ET为0.5 ms进行,而停留时间(δt)从0.1到1 ms不等。所有测试均在500、1000、1500和2000 bar导轨压力下进行。根据注射压力的不同,注射针不能在短时间内完全闭合,注射被合并。与博世管法相比,动量通量法在准稳态相位具有更快的上升和衰减以及更多的振荡。用博世管法预测了注射的有效持续时间。结果表明,动量通量法更适合于测量多种注入策略的ROI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of the Rate of Injection of Diesel Solenoid Injectors Operated in the Multiple Injection Strategy: A Comparison of the Spray Momentum and Bosch Tube Methods
Multiple injection strategies can be used for controlling the heat release rate in an engine, particularly in compression ignition engines. This can mitigate the heat transfer losses and overcome the limitation related to the maximum pressure allowed for a particular engine. Controlling heat release with repetitive injections requires precise characterization of the fuel injection rates. In such a configuration, the injector used should be characterized for its hydraulic delay, rate of injection, and the effect of dwell timing with multiple injections. This study investigates the fuel injection behavior of a high-flow-rate solenoid injector operated with single and double injections. Two characterization methods, the momentum flux, and the Bosch tube are used and compared to investigate their suitability with the multiple injection strategies. Experiments with single injection are conducted by varying the Energizing Timing (ET) from 0.5 up to 2 ms. The tests with multiple injections (i.e., double injections) are conducted with a fixed ET of 0.5 ms, while the dwell times (δt) are varied from 0.1 up to 1 ms. All tests are performed at 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 bar rail pressures. Depending on the injection pressure, the injector’s needle could not fully close with short dwell times and the injections are merged. The momentum flux method has faster ramp-up and decaying and more oscillations in the quasi-steady-state phase compared to the Bosch tube method. The effective duration of injection is overpredicted with the Bosch tube method. The momentum flux method is demonstrated to be more suitable for measuring the ROI of multiple injection strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering
Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信