Fissidens subgen。从铃木等人的系统发育树的角度来划分膜状和膜状的岩浆岩类型。

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Lindbergia Pub Date : 2021-01-05 DOI:10.25227/linbg.01137

M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga

{"title":"Fissidens subgen。从铃木等人的系统发育树的角度来划分膜状和膜状的岩浆岩类型。","authors":"M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga","doi":"10.25227/linbg.01137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scariosus type of peristome and the bryoides peristome were considered by Pursell and Bruggeman-Nannenga to be diagnostic for subgen. Aloma and subgen. Fissidens respectively. Several later authors did not recognize these peristome types nor did they recognize subgen. Aloma. In a recent molecular study, however, subgen. Aloma emerges as a clade of equal rank to subgenus Fissidens. Based on this and on numerous observations of peristomes the scariosus- and bryoides-type peristome are retrieved from oblivion, compared to each other, re-described and illustrated.","PeriodicalId":18037,"journal":{"name":"Lindbergia","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fissidens subgen. Aloma, the scariosus- and bryoides-type of peristome in the light of the phylogenetic tree by Suzuki et al.\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga\",\"doi\":\"10.25227/linbg.01137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scariosus type of peristome and the bryoides peristome were considered by Pursell and Bruggeman-Nannenga to be diagnostic for subgen. Aloma and subgen. Fissidens respectively. Several later authors did not recognize these peristome types nor did they recognize subgen. Aloma. In a recent molecular study, however, subgen. Aloma emerges as a clade of equal rank to subgenus Fissidens. Based on this and on numerous observations of peristomes the scariosus- and bryoides-type peristome are retrieved from oblivion, compared to each other, re-described and illustrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lindbergia\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lindbergia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lindbergia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

Pursell和Bruggeman-Nannenga认为scariosus型和briyoides型的peristome是诊断的亚群。Aloma和subgen。Fissidens分别。后来的几位作者既没有识别出这些枯肠类型，也没有识别出亚群。Aloma。然而，在最近的一项分子研究中，亚基。作为一种与裂足亚属同等级别的分支出现。在此基础上，根据对岩浆岩的大量观察，从遗忘中检索出了石质岩浆岩型和布氏岩浆岩型岩浆岩，相互比较，重新描述和说明。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fissidens subgen. Aloma, the scariosus- and bryoides-type of peristome in the light of the phylogenetic tree by Suzuki et al.

The scariosus type of peristome and the bryoides peristome were considered by Pursell and Bruggeman-Nannenga to be diagnostic for subgen. Aloma and subgen. Fissidens respectively. Several later authors did not recognize these peristome types nor did they recognize subgen. Aloma. In a recent molecular study, however, subgen. Aloma emerges as a clade of equal rank to subgenus Fissidens. Based on this and on numerous observations of peristomes the scariosus- and bryoides-type peristome are retrieved from oblivion, compared to each other, re-described and illustrated.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Lindbergia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

19 weeks