代表性样本,随机抽样

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
A. Marradi
{"title":"代表性样本,随机抽样","authors":"A. Marradi","doi":"10.36253/cambio-12691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract della redazione: \nIn the social sciences literature the expressions  ‘random sample’ and ‘representative sample’ are often used improperly and sometimes even interchangeably by students who seem to think that sample is representative in so far, and because, it is random. \nIn this essay I shall discuss the proper use of ‘random’, ‘representative’ and related terms, and I shall argue that no logic nexus exists between the two concepts, nor does any causal relationship between the two sets of phenomena. The analysis begins with the term that raises the most annoying problems, and accordingly  is less explored in the literature, viz, ‘representativeness’.","PeriodicalId":41955,"journal":{"name":"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representative Samples, Random Sampling\",\"authors\":\"A. Marradi\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/cambio-12691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract della redazione: \\nIn the social sciences literature the expressions  ‘random sample’ and ‘representative sample’ are often used improperly and sometimes even interchangeably by students who seem to think that sample is representative in so far, and because, it is random. \\nIn this essay I shall discuss the proper use of ‘random’, ‘representative’ and related terms, and I shall argue that no logic nexus exists between the two concepts, nor does any causal relationship between the two sets of phenomena. The analysis begins with the term that raises the most annoying problems, and accordingly  is less explored in the literature, viz, ‘representativeness’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-12691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambio-Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-12691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在社会科学文献中,“随机样本”和“代表性样本”这两个词经常被不正确地使用,有时甚至被学生们混淆使用,他们似乎认为样本到目前为止是具有代表性的,因为它是随机的。在这篇文章中,我将讨论“随机”、“代表性”和相关术语的正确使用,我将论证这两个概念之间不存在逻辑联系,两组现象之间也不存在任何因果关系。分析从提出最令人烦恼的问题的术语开始,因此在文献中较少探讨,即“代表性”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representative Samples, Random Sampling
Abstract della redazione: In the social sciences literature the expressions  ‘random sample’ and ‘representative sample’ are often used improperly and sometimes even interchangeably by students who seem to think that sample is representative in so far, and because, it is random. In this essay I shall discuss the proper use of ‘random’, ‘representative’ and related terms, and I shall argue that no logic nexus exists between the two concepts, nor does any causal relationship between the two sets of phenomena. The analysis begins with the term that raises the most annoying problems, and accordingly  is less explored in the literature, viz, ‘representativeness’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信