联邦调查局实验室收到的骨骼残骸的发现背景

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2020-01-30 DOI:10.5744/fa.2020.1007
Angi M. Christensen, J. Pokines
{"title":"联邦调查局实验室收到的骨骼残骸的发现背景","authors":"Angi M. Christensen, J. Pokines","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.1007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cases received for anthropological examination by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Laboratory for a 4-year period (2013–2017) were reviewed for the context of the discovery of remains. The assessment was compared with a previous similar review of cases received by the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), with particular attention to whether remains were initially discovered through deliberate law enforcement searches or inadvertently discovered by others. Results show that 52.9% of FBI Laboratory anthropology cases were initially discovered by law enforcement, compared to only 3.6% of Massachusetts OCME cases. Reasons for this difference are discussed, as well as other similarities and differences in discovery mode and context for anthropology cases between these two laboratories.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"58 1","pages":"59-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovery Context of Skeletal Remains Received at the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Angi M. Christensen, J. Pokines\",\"doi\":\"10.5744/fa.2020.1007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cases received for anthropological examination by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Laboratory for a 4-year period (2013–2017) were reviewed for the context of the discovery of remains. The assessment was compared with a previous similar review of cases received by the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), with particular attention to whether remains were initially discovered through deliberate law enforcement searches or inadvertently discovered by others. Results show that 52.9% of FBI Laboratory anthropology cases were initially discovered by law enforcement, compared to only 3.6% of Massachusetts OCME cases. Reasons for this difference are discussed, as well as other similarities and differences in discovery mode and context for anthropology cases between these two laboratories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finanzarchiv\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"59-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finanzarchiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.1007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美国联邦调查局(FBI)实验室在4年期间(2013-2017年)收到的人类学检查案例进行了审查,以确定发现遗骸的背景。将这一评估与马萨诸塞州首席法医办公室(OCME)先前收到的类似案件审查进行了比较,特别关注遗骸最初是通过执法部门的蓄意搜查发现的,还是由其他人无意中发现的。结果显示,52.9%的FBI实验室人类学案件最初是由执法部门发现的,而马萨诸塞州OCME案件只有3.6%。讨论了这种差异的原因,以及这两个实验室在发现模式和人类学案例背景方面的其他异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discovery Context of Skeletal Remains Received at the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory
Cases received for anthropological examination by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Laboratory for a 4-year period (2013–2017) were reviewed for the context of the discovery of remains. The assessment was compared with a previous similar review of cases received by the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME), with particular attention to whether remains were initially discovered through deliberate law enforcement searches or inadvertently discovered by others. Results show that 52.9% of FBI Laboratory anthropology cases were initially discovered by law enforcement, compared to only 3.6% of Massachusetts OCME cases. Reasons for this difference are discussed, as well as other similarities and differences in discovery mode and context for anthropology cases between these two laboratories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信