德国基友医学界的短篇历史

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
H. Raspe
{"title":"德国基友医学界的短篇历史","authors":"H. Raspe","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2018-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text reflects the history of evidence-based medicine (EbM) in Germany from the mid1990ies to the present. Here, EbM has established itself first and successfully as evidence-based health care, i. e. above the clinical level and within the normative context of Germany’s social law. The distance between EbM and clinic, perceptible from the beginning, has seemingly not much changed. EbM had more influence on clinical jargon than clinical practice. This is on the one hand a result of its introduction „top down“ and on the other of a scientific tradition of German clinical medicine. Until the 1980ies the introduction of new diagnostic and therapeutic methods has been relying (and actually relies again) stronger on biomedical deductions than empirical testing. An additional factor are conflicts between EbM and the increasing economisation of the clinic. Lastly, developments within EbM itself lead to alienation from the clinic, its self-concept, pragmatic logic, and practices.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eine kurze Geschichte der Evidenz-basierten Medizin in Deutschland\",\"authors\":\"H. Raspe\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/medhist-2018-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text reflects the history of evidence-based medicine (EbM) in Germany from the mid1990ies to the present. Here, EbM has established itself first and successfully as evidence-based health care, i. e. above the clinical level and within the normative context of Germany’s social law. The distance between EbM and clinic, perceptible from the beginning, has seemingly not much changed. EbM had more influence on clinical jargon than clinical practice. This is on the one hand a result of its introduction „top down“ and on the other of a scientific tradition of German clinical medicine. Until the 1980ies the introduction of new diagnostic and therapeutic methods has been relying (and actually relies again) stronger on biomedical deductions than empirical testing. An additional factor are conflicts between EbM and the increasing economisation of the clinic. Lastly, developments within EbM itself lead to alienation from the clinic, its self-concept, pragmatic logic, and practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文反映了德国从20世纪90年代中期至今的循证医学(EbM)的历史。在这里,循证医学首先并成功地确立了自己作为循证医疗保健的地位,即在临床层面之上,在德国社会法律的规范范围内。循证医学和临床之间的距离,从一开始就很明显,似乎没有太大的改变。循证医学对临床术语的影响大于对临床实践的影响。这一方面是“自上而下”引进的结果,另一方面是德国临床医学的科学传统。直到20世纪80年代,新的诊断和治疗方法的引入一直依赖(实际上再次依赖)更多的是生物医学推断,而不是经验检验。另一个因素是循证医学与诊所日益节约之间的冲突。最后,循证医学自身的发展导致了与诊所、自我概念、实用逻辑和实践的疏离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eine kurze Geschichte der Evidenz-basierten Medizin in Deutschland
The text reflects the history of evidence-based medicine (EbM) in Germany from the mid1990ies to the present. Here, EbM has established itself first and successfully as evidence-based health care, i. e. above the clinical level and within the normative context of Germany’s social law. The distance between EbM and clinic, perceptible from the beginning, has seemingly not much changed. EbM had more influence on clinical jargon than clinical practice. This is on the one hand a result of its introduction „top down“ and on the other of a scientific tradition of German clinical medicine. Until the 1980ies the introduction of new diagnostic and therapeutic methods has been relying (and actually relies again) stronger on biomedical deductions than empirical testing. An additional factor are conflicts between EbM and the increasing economisation of the clinic. Lastly, developments within EbM itself lead to alienation from the clinic, its self-concept, pragmatic logic, and practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信