E. Panigo, I. Dellaferrera, C. A. Alesso, A. Vegetti, M. Perreta
{"title":"芽库在两种草本植物耐草甘膦中的作用","authors":"E. Panigo, I. Dellaferrera, C. A. Alesso, A. Vegetti, M. Perreta","doi":"10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n4.24301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: Commelina erecta and Eutsachys retusa are two perennial weeds, which show high resprouting after glyphosate application. This behavior represents a serious problem for weed management. The purpose of this study was to characterize the bud bank of both species and to assess their response to glyphosate application. \nM&M: We analyzed 120 reproductive shoots of C. erecta, and 80 reproductive shoots of E. retusa, at 30- and 60-days post- herbicide application. The doses applied to C. erecta were 0 (control), 1.200 and 2.400 g a.i. ha -1 , and to E. retusa were 0 (control), 480 and 1200 g a.i. ha -1 . \nResults: We found that both species presented active buds in approximately 50% of their nodes, even after herbicide application. Bud bank dynamics changed in both weeds after herbicide application, and therefore their growth pattern. The activation of originally inhibited buds allowed weeds to regrow and survive after glyphosate application altering their architecture. \nConclusions: The bud bank plays an important role in glyphosate tolerance in both weeds. The resprouting capacity in both species was similar for any dose of glyphosate applied. Therefore, an alternative control strategy based on the increase of the dose of herbicide would not be a successful alternative for the management of these weeds. The interruption of the storage of reserves in the rhizome system and the reduction of the number of buds would be key to effective long-term management of these and other perennial weeds in no tillage cropping system.","PeriodicalId":49101,"journal":{"name":"Boletin De La Sociedad Argentina De Botanica","volume":"46 28 1","pages":"553-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of bud bank in glyphosate tolerance of two herbaceous species\",\"authors\":\"E. Panigo, I. Dellaferrera, C. A. Alesso, A. Vegetti, M. Perreta\",\"doi\":\"10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n4.24301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aims: Commelina erecta and Eutsachys retusa are two perennial weeds, which show high resprouting after glyphosate application. This behavior represents a serious problem for weed management. The purpose of this study was to characterize the bud bank of both species and to assess their response to glyphosate application. \\nM&M: We analyzed 120 reproductive shoots of C. erecta, and 80 reproductive shoots of E. retusa, at 30- and 60-days post- herbicide application. The doses applied to C. erecta were 0 (control), 1.200 and 2.400 g a.i. ha -1 , and to E. retusa were 0 (control), 480 and 1200 g a.i. ha -1 . \\nResults: We found that both species presented active buds in approximately 50% of their nodes, even after herbicide application. Bud bank dynamics changed in both weeds after herbicide application, and therefore their growth pattern. The activation of originally inhibited buds allowed weeds to regrow and survive after glyphosate application altering their architecture. \\nConclusions: The bud bank plays an important role in glyphosate tolerance in both weeds. The resprouting capacity in both species was similar for any dose of glyphosate applied. Therefore, an alternative control strategy based on the increase of the dose of herbicide would not be a successful alternative for the management of these weeds. The interruption of the storage of reserves in the rhizome system and the reduction of the number of buds would be key to effective long-term management of these and other perennial weeds in no tillage cropping system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boletin De La Sociedad Argentina De Botanica\",\"volume\":\"46 28 1\",\"pages\":\"553-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boletin De La Sociedad Argentina De Botanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n4.24301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletin De La Sociedad Argentina De Botanica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v54.n4.24301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的:草甘膦对两种多年生杂草有较高的再生率。这种行为对杂草管理来说是一个严重的问题。本研究的目的是表征这两个物种的芽库,并评估它们对草甘膦应用的反应。M&M:我们分析了施用除草剂后30天和60天,120株直立木(C. erecta)的生殖芽和80株沙蚕(E. retusa)的生殖芽。给药剂量分别为0(对照)、1.200和2.400 g a.i. ha -1,给药剂量分别为0(对照)、480和1200 g a.i. ha -1。结果:我们发现两种植物在大约50%的节点上都有活跃的芽,即使在施用除草剂后也是如此。施用除草剂后,两种杂草的芽库动态发生了变化,从而改变了它们的生长模式。激活原本被抑制的芽允许杂草在草甘膦应用改变其结构后重新生长和存活。结论:芽库在两种杂草的草甘膦耐受性中起重要作用。在施用任何剂量的草甘膦后,这两个物种的繁殖能力相似。因此,以增加除草剂剂量为基础的替代控制策略不会是管理这些杂草的成功替代策略。中断根茎系统的储备和减少芽数将是在免耕种植制度下有效长期管理这些杂草和其他多年生杂草的关键。
The role of bud bank in glyphosate tolerance of two herbaceous species
Background and aims: Commelina erecta and Eutsachys retusa are two perennial weeds, which show high resprouting after glyphosate application. This behavior represents a serious problem for weed management. The purpose of this study was to characterize the bud bank of both species and to assess their response to glyphosate application.
M&M: We analyzed 120 reproductive shoots of C. erecta, and 80 reproductive shoots of E. retusa, at 30- and 60-days post- herbicide application. The doses applied to C. erecta were 0 (control), 1.200 and 2.400 g a.i. ha -1 , and to E. retusa were 0 (control), 480 and 1200 g a.i. ha -1 .
Results: We found that both species presented active buds in approximately 50% of their nodes, even after herbicide application. Bud bank dynamics changed in both weeds after herbicide application, and therefore their growth pattern. The activation of originally inhibited buds allowed weeds to regrow and survive after glyphosate application altering their architecture.
Conclusions: The bud bank plays an important role in glyphosate tolerance in both weeds. The resprouting capacity in both species was similar for any dose of glyphosate applied. Therefore, an alternative control strategy based on the increase of the dose of herbicide would not be a successful alternative for the management of these weeds. The interruption of the storage of reserves in the rhizome system and the reduction of the number of buds would be key to effective long-term management of these and other perennial weeds in no tillage cropping system.
期刊介绍:
Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. publishes original scientific works from the whole spectrum of Plant Biology (structure, anatomy, development, physiology, cytology, genetics, evolution, ecology, paleobotany, palynology, ethnobotany, etc.) in the diverse vegetable organisms and related groups (mycology, ficology, lichenology, briology, etc.), both in basic and applied aspects.
Taxonomic works (of systematics, phylogeny, monographs, revisions, lectotypifications, nomenclatural acts, descriptions of taxa), phytogeographic and phytosociological works (survey and classification of vegetation at different spatial scales and without restriction of methodological approaches) are considered for publication. Contributions that address complete phytogeographic units or sub-units and those that fill gaps in knowledge of vegetation in little-known territories are especially welcome. Extensions of geographical areas are published only when it comes to new citations for a country. Checklists and lists of annotated plants are not published.
Articles submitted for publication must be original and must not have been submitted to another publisher or previously published (print or electronic format). Submissions of papers already published in another language will not be accepted (autoplagio for translation).