探索生态足迹背后的数学

A. Galli, J. Kitzes, P. Wermer, M. Wackernagel, V. Niccolucci, E. Tiezzi
{"title":"探索生态足迹背后的数学","authors":"A. Galli, J. Kitzes, P. Wermer, M. Wackernagel, V. Niccolucci, E. Tiezzi","doi":"10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduced in the early 1990s, the ecological footprint has become a well-known and widespread environmental accounting tool. It measures human demand on nature and compares this to the availability of regenerative capacity on the planet. The method expresses human demand in terms of global hectares – i.e. biologically productive hectares with world-average productivity necessary for resource production and waste assimilation. Almost 15 years of research application and methodological advancements have made the ecological footprint an increasingly robust theoretical framework, and it continues to be refi ned. This article documents the most updated footprint methodology and focuses on the mathematics that supports footprint and biocapacity accounts, as well as its underlying factors such as equivalence and yield factors. To clarify the meaning and the usefulness of footprint and biocapacity reported in terms of global hectares, an in-depth description of the units of measure is presented. Finally, the different research questions that emerge when reporting data in nation-specifi c hectares as opposed to global hectares are investigated.","PeriodicalId":13902,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","volume":"97 1","pages":"250-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"108","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of the mathematics behind the ecological footprint\",\"authors\":\"A. Galli, J. Kitzes, P. Wermer, M. Wackernagel, V. Niccolucci, E. Tiezzi\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduced in the early 1990s, the ecological footprint has become a well-known and widespread environmental accounting tool. It measures human demand on nature and compares this to the availability of regenerative capacity on the planet. The method expresses human demand in terms of global hectares – i.e. biologically productive hectares with world-average productivity necessary for resource production and waste assimilation. Almost 15 years of research application and methodological advancements have made the ecological footprint an increasingly robust theoretical framework, and it continues to be refi ned. This article documents the most updated footprint methodology and focuses on the mathematics that supports footprint and biocapacity accounts, as well as its underlying factors such as equivalence and yield factors. To clarify the meaning and the usefulness of footprint and biocapacity reported in terms of global hectares, an in-depth description of the units of measure is presented. Finally, the different research questions that emerge when reporting data in nation-specifi c hectares as opposed to global hectares are investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"250-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"108\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

摘要

生态足迹在20世纪90年代初被引入,已经成为一个众所周知和广泛使用的环境会计工具。它衡量人类对自然的需求,并将其与地球上可再生能力的可用性进行比较。该方法以全球公顷表示人类需求,即具有资源生产和废物同化所需的世界平均生产力的生物生产性公顷。近15年的研究应用和方法的进步使生态足迹成为一个日益强大的理论框架,并继续完善。本文记录了最新的足迹方法,并重点介绍了支持足迹和生物承载力核算的数学方法,以及等效性和产量因素等潜在因素。为了阐明以全球公顷为单位报告的足迹和生物承载力的意义和有用性,本文对测量单位进行了深入的描述。最后,研究了在报告国家特定公顷数据而不是全球公顷数据时出现的不同研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of the mathematics behind the ecological footprint
Introduced in the early 1990s, the ecological footprint has become a well-known and widespread environmental accounting tool. It measures human demand on nature and compares this to the availability of regenerative capacity on the planet. The method expresses human demand in terms of global hectares – i.e. biologically productive hectares with world-average productivity necessary for resource production and waste assimilation. Almost 15 years of research application and methodological advancements have made the ecological footprint an increasingly robust theoretical framework, and it continues to be refi ned. This article documents the most updated footprint methodology and focuses on the mathematics that supports footprint and biocapacity accounts, as well as its underlying factors such as equivalence and yield factors. To clarify the meaning and the usefulness of footprint and biocapacity reported in terms of global hectares, an in-depth description of the units of measure is presented. Finally, the different research questions that emerge when reporting data in nation-specifi c hectares as opposed to global hectares are investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信