管理组织知识和创造力的战略导向和策略

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Catalina Carmona-Osorio, Santiago Ángel-Gallego, José Arias-Pérez
{"title":"管理组织知识和创造力的战略导向和策略","authors":"Catalina Carmona-Osorio, Santiago Ángel-Gallego, José Arias-Pérez","doi":"10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the direct effects of strategic orientation in innovation and competition on personalisation and codification type knowledge management (KM) strategies and their organisational creativity. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe authors counter-checked the hypothesis model with a sample of 169 companies in emerging markets that adopt technology: a country such as Colombia. To do so, the authors used structural equations with the least squares model. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe data indicate that both KM strategies positively influence creativity; however, personalisation has a greater effect. Additionally, SG for innovation has a positive effect on both KM strategies; however, for competition, KM only has an influence on codification. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe relation between KM strategies and creativity has been approached on a strictly theoretical level; therefore, this paper provides empirical evidence on the subject. It also establishes the direct effect that SG has on KM strategies, which have so far only been tangentially analysed. In so doing, it goes further than the limitations in the literature regarding analysis of the KM-creativity relationship, but it does not consider business strategy implications.","PeriodicalId":45515,"journal":{"name":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","volume":"83 1","pages":"312-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic orientation and strategies to manage organisational knowledge and creativity\",\"authors\":\"Catalina Carmona-Osorio, Santiago Ángel-Gallego, José Arias-Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyse the direct effects of strategic orientation in innovation and competition on personalisation and codification type knowledge management (KM) strategies and their organisational creativity. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe authors counter-checked the hypothesis model with a sample of 169 companies in emerging markets that adopt technology: a country such as Colombia. To do so, the authors used structural equations with the least squares model. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe data indicate that both KM strategies positively influence creativity; however, personalisation has a greater effect. Additionally, SG for innovation has a positive effect on both KM strategies; however, for competition, KM only has an influence on codification. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe relation between KM strategies and creativity has been approached on a strictly theoretical level; therefore, this paper provides empirical evidence on the subject. It also establishes the direct effect that SG has on KM strategies, which have so far only been tangentially analysed. In so doing, it goes further than the limitations in the literature regarding analysis of the KM-creativity relationship, but it does not consider business strategy implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"312-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2016-0131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的目的是分析创新和竞争中的战略导向对个性化和法典化型知识管理战略及其组织创造力的直接影响。设计/方法/方法两位作者以采用技术的169家新兴市场公司为样本,对这一假设模型进行了反驳。为此,作者使用了具有最小二乘模型的结构方程。发现两种知识管理策略对创造力均有正向影响;然而,个性化的影响更大。此外,创新SG对两种知识管理策略均有正向影响;而对于竞争而言,KM仅对法制化有影响。知识管理策略与创造力之间的关系在严格的理论层面上进行了探讨;因此,本文就这一问题提供了经验证据。它还建立了SG对知识管理战略的直接影响,迄今为止,这只是间接分析。在这样做的过程中,它超越了文献中关于km -创造力关系分析的局限性,但它没有考虑商业战略的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic orientation and strategies to manage organisational knowledge and creativity
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the direct effects of strategic orientation in innovation and competition on personalisation and codification type knowledge management (KM) strategies and their organisational creativity. Design/methodology/approach The authors counter-checked the hypothesis model with a sample of 169 companies in emerging markets that adopt technology: a country such as Colombia. To do so, the authors used structural equations with the least squares model. Findings The data indicate that both KM strategies positively influence creativity; however, personalisation has a greater effect. Additionally, SG for innovation has a positive effect on both KM strategies; however, for competition, KM only has an influence on codification. Originality/value The relation between KM strategies and creativity has been approached on a strictly theoretical level; therefore, this paper provides empirical evidence on the subject. It also establishes the direct effect that SG has on KM strategies, which have so far only been tangentially analysed. In so doing, it goes further than the limitations in the literature regarding analysis of the KM-creativity relationship, but it does not consider business strategy implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信