{"title":"失去自己的亲人","authors":"Nicolás Casullo, Marta Ines Merajver","doi":"10.1590/S0327-77122007000100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present late-modern times of globalization under the rule of the market pose new, traumatic forms of exile resulting from the ruins of national identities, of millions of people fleeing their countries and crossing borders in either legal or illegal ways, of walls raised to prevent entrance of travelers coming from an economic and cultural post modernity which is dividing the world into lands of labor and lands of misery and death. Modernity brought along a profound sign of exile, caused by political, social, and spiritual uprooting, by the decentering of native times, spaces, and regions that gradually faded away. This modern kind of uprooting was posited in the 18 Century by J.J. Rousseau in his novel Julia y la Nueva Heloisa. Still, if we go back to the origins of Western civilization, the Aegean world inflicted the penalty of exile as a most serious punishment, and looked upon exiles as living dead. In Euripides’ tragedy Medea, the protagonist exemplifies heinous exile within a play that outlines various instances of exile. Coming back to modernity, it is then when we shall find literary, poetic, and philosophic exposures of the infinite varieties of the loss of a sense of belonging, personal inscriptions, the homes of the soul, all of them sorrows that may or may not entail geographic or non geographic violence. Modern subjectivity felt exiled from language, from individual marks, from the words that named the world, and from the very sense that identified life. This exiled subjectivity composed the modern esthetic symphony: to be a stranger in one’s own homeland; to be a foreigner to filiation. In the realm of history, 19 and 20 Century capitalism found, in exile, the new foundation of a vast part of America through substantial throngs of migrants who had been forced out of Europe for economic, political, racial, and cultural reasons.","PeriodicalId":87511,"journal":{"name":"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires","volume":"26 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The loss of one's own\",\"authors\":\"Nicolás Casullo, Marta Ines Merajver\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0327-77122007000100003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present late-modern times of globalization under the rule of the market pose new, traumatic forms of exile resulting from the ruins of national identities, of millions of people fleeing their countries and crossing borders in either legal or illegal ways, of walls raised to prevent entrance of travelers coming from an economic and cultural post modernity which is dividing the world into lands of labor and lands of misery and death. Modernity brought along a profound sign of exile, caused by political, social, and spiritual uprooting, by the decentering of native times, spaces, and regions that gradually faded away. This modern kind of uprooting was posited in the 18 Century by J.J. Rousseau in his novel Julia y la Nueva Heloisa. Still, if we go back to the origins of Western civilization, the Aegean world inflicted the penalty of exile as a most serious punishment, and looked upon exiles as living dead. In Euripides’ tragedy Medea, the protagonist exemplifies heinous exile within a play that outlines various instances of exile. Coming back to modernity, it is then when we shall find literary, poetic, and philosophic exposures of the infinite varieties of the loss of a sense of belonging, personal inscriptions, the homes of the soul, all of them sorrows that may or may not entail geographic or non geographic violence. Modern subjectivity felt exiled from language, from individual marks, from the words that named the world, and from the very sense that identified life. This exiled subjectivity composed the modern esthetic symphony: to be a stranger in one’s own homeland; to be a foreigner to filiation. In the realm of history, 19 and 20 Century capitalism found, in exile, the new foundation of a vast part of America through substantial throngs of migrants who had been forced out of Europe for economic, political, racial, and cultural reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0-0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0327-77122007000100003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de la Sociedad de Puericultura de Buenos Aires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0327-77122007000100003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前,在市场统治下的全球化晚期,由于国家身份的废墟,数百万人逃离自己的国家,以合法或非法的方式跨越边界,以及为防止来自经济和文化后现代的旅行者进入而竖起的墙,造成了新的,创伤性的流亡形式,这种后现代正在将世界划分为劳动之地和痛苦和死亡之地。现代性带来了一种深刻的流亡迹象,这是由政治、社会和精神上的连根拔起造成的,是由逐渐消失的本土时代、空间和地区的去中心化造成的。这种现代的“连根拔起”是在18世纪由J.J. Rousseau在他的小说《Julia y la Nueva Heloisa》中提出的。然而,如果我们回到西方文明的起源,爱琴海世界将流放视为最严厉的惩罚,并将流亡者视为活死人。在欧里庇得斯的悲剧《美狄亚》中,主人公在一出概述了各种流放实例的戏剧中例证了令人发指的流放。回到现代性,那时我们将发现文学、诗歌和哲学对无限种类的归属感丧失、个人铭文、灵魂家园的揭露,所有这些悲伤可能或不可能导致地理或非地理暴力。现代的主体性感觉被语言、个人标记、命名世界的词语以及识别生活的意义所放逐。这种被放逐的主体性谱写了现代的审美交响曲:在自己的家乡做一个陌生人;对婚姻不熟悉。在历史领域,19世纪和20世纪的资本主义在流亡中,通过大量因经济、政治、种族和文化原因而被迫离开欧洲的移民,为美国大部分地区建立了新的基础。
The present late-modern times of globalization under the rule of the market pose new, traumatic forms of exile resulting from the ruins of national identities, of millions of people fleeing their countries and crossing borders in either legal or illegal ways, of walls raised to prevent entrance of travelers coming from an economic and cultural post modernity which is dividing the world into lands of labor and lands of misery and death. Modernity brought along a profound sign of exile, caused by political, social, and spiritual uprooting, by the decentering of native times, spaces, and regions that gradually faded away. This modern kind of uprooting was posited in the 18 Century by J.J. Rousseau in his novel Julia y la Nueva Heloisa. Still, if we go back to the origins of Western civilization, the Aegean world inflicted the penalty of exile as a most serious punishment, and looked upon exiles as living dead. In Euripides’ tragedy Medea, the protagonist exemplifies heinous exile within a play that outlines various instances of exile. Coming back to modernity, it is then when we shall find literary, poetic, and philosophic exposures of the infinite varieties of the loss of a sense of belonging, personal inscriptions, the homes of the soul, all of them sorrows that may or may not entail geographic or non geographic violence. Modern subjectivity felt exiled from language, from individual marks, from the words that named the world, and from the very sense that identified life. This exiled subjectivity composed the modern esthetic symphony: to be a stranger in one’s own homeland; to be a foreigner to filiation. In the realm of history, 19 and 20 Century capitalism found, in exile, the new foundation of a vast part of America through substantial throngs of migrants who had been forced out of Europe for economic, political, racial, and cultural reasons.