广播中的世俗之声:英国人关于当天思想的辩论

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Timothy Karis
{"title":"广播中的世俗之声:英国人关于当天思想的辩论","authors":"Timothy Karis","doi":"10.1163/21659214-00703006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term ‘secular’ has long been interpreted in academia either as opposition towards religion or as a neutral position. As a Western concept deeply entangled with Christianity, its application to non-Christian and non-Western societies is highly contested. In our first case study, we analyse the British debate about including non-religious belief groups in the radio segment Thought for the Day. The bbc conceives secular as opposition to or absence of religion, whereas secularist groups argue secular worldviews should be treated on par with religious ones.","PeriodicalId":29881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture","volume":"314 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secular Voices on Air: The British Debate on Thought for the Day\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Karis\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/21659214-00703006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term ‘secular’ has long been interpreted in academia either as opposition towards religion or as a neutral position. As a Western concept deeply entangled with Christianity, its application to non-Christian and non-Western societies is highly contested. In our first case study, we analyse the British debate about including non-religious belief groups in the radio segment Thought for the Day. The bbc conceives secular as opposition to or absence of religion, whereas secularist groups argue secular worldviews should be treated on par with religious ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture\",\"volume\":\"314 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00703006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-00703006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,“世俗”一词在学术界要么被解释为反对宗教,要么被解释为中立立场。作为一个与基督教深深纠缠在一起的西方概念,它在非基督教和非西方社会的应用备受争议。在我们的第一个案例研究中,我们分析了英国关于将非宗教信仰团体纳入广播节目“每日思想”的辩论。bbc认为世俗是反对或没有宗教,而世俗主义团体则认为世俗世界观应该与宗教世界观同等对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secular Voices on Air: The British Debate on Thought for the Day
The term ‘secular’ has long been interpreted in academia either as opposition towards religion or as a neutral position. As a Western concept deeply entangled with Christianity, its application to non-Christian and non-Western societies is highly contested. In our first case study, we analyse the British debate about including non-religious belief groups in the radio segment Thought for the Day. The bbc conceives secular as opposition to or absence of religion, whereas secularist groups argue secular worldviews should be treated on par with religious ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信