打勾和打卡:对劳动力市场一体化中性别主流化的批判观点

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Shelley Kotze, Ana Blazheva, Mirek Dymitrow
{"title":"打勾和打卡:对劳动力市场一体化中性别主流化的批判观点","authors":"Shelley Kotze, Ana Blazheva, Mirek Dymitrow","doi":"10.1080/00291951.2021.1929453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mainstreaming is a popular approach when seeking to address societal inequalities. Gender and migrant integration are mainstreamed within EU policy, both seeking to increase labour market participation as a means to redress inequality. However, there are limited references to migrant women within gender equality or integration policies at the EU level. The study dissects a subset of migrant integration projects in Sweden – a country lauded for having Europe’s best integration policy while exhibiting the poorest results. The authors used non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews to identify pitfalls such as embedded stereotyping, undervaluation of cultural motivations, gender-washing, and methodological misalignment. Their findings show that gender and integration mainstreaming within the EU systematically position migrant women as a problem, despite the significantly important role they play within global labour markets. The authors conclude that migrant women may need to be included within gender and integration policy beyond the labour market.","PeriodicalId":46764,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ticking boxes and clocking in: A critical view of gender mainstreaming in labour-market integration\",\"authors\":\"Shelley Kotze, Ana Blazheva, Mirek Dymitrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00291951.2021.1929453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Mainstreaming is a popular approach when seeking to address societal inequalities. Gender and migrant integration are mainstreamed within EU policy, both seeking to increase labour market participation as a means to redress inequality. However, there are limited references to migrant women within gender equality or integration policies at the EU level. The study dissects a subset of migrant integration projects in Sweden – a country lauded for having Europe’s best integration policy while exhibiting the poorest results. The authors used non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews to identify pitfalls such as embedded stereotyping, undervaluation of cultural motivations, gender-washing, and methodological misalignment. Their findings show that gender and integration mainstreaming within the EU systematically position migrant women as a problem, despite the significantly important role they play within global labour markets. The authors conclude that migrant women may need to be included within gender and integration policy beyond the labour market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2021.1929453\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2021.1929453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在寻求解决社会不平等问题时,主流化是一种流行的方法。性别和移民融合是欧盟政策的主流,两者都寻求增加劳动力市场参与度,以此作为纠正不平等的手段。然而,在欧盟一级的性别平等或融合政策中,对移徙妇女的提及有限。这项研究剖析了瑞典移民融合项目的一个子集——瑞典被誉为拥有欧洲最好的融合政策,但却表现出最差的结果。作者使用非参与性观察和半结构化访谈来识别陷阱,如根深蒂固的刻板印象、对文化动机的低估、性别清洗和方法偏差。他们的研究结果表明,尽管移民妇女在全球劳动力市场中发挥着重要作用,但欧盟内部的性别和融合主流化系统地将她们定位为一个问题。作者的结论是,移徙妇女可能需要被纳入劳动力市场以外的性别和融合政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ticking boxes and clocking in: A critical view of gender mainstreaming in labour-market integration
ABSTRACT Mainstreaming is a popular approach when seeking to address societal inequalities. Gender and migrant integration are mainstreamed within EU policy, both seeking to increase labour market participation as a means to redress inequality. However, there are limited references to migrant women within gender equality or integration policies at the EU level. The study dissects a subset of migrant integration projects in Sweden – a country lauded for having Europe’s best integration policy while exhibiting the poorest results. The authors used non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews to identify pitfalls such as embedded stereotyping, undervaluation of cultural motivations, gender-washing, and methodological misalignment. Their findings show that gender and integration mainstreaming within the EU systematically position migrant women as a problem, despite the significantly important role they play within global labour markets. The authors conclude that migrant women may need to be included within gender and integration policy beyond the labour market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信