会计政策与股利限制:欧洲比较

Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1515/ael-2021-0041
Anne Le Manh
{"title":"会计政策与股利限制:欧洲比较","authors":"Anne Le Manh","doi":"10.1515/ael-2021-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The adoption of IFRS by the EU has raised issues about its economic consequences in terms of, among others, volatility of corporate profits, taxation of profit and distribution of dividends. Indeed, it has brought the interactions between legal rules for dividend distribution and accounting policies back into focus. The EU company and accounting regulations are based on capital maintenance rules that involve limitations on dividend distribution when certain accounting policies are implemented in individual financial statements under local GAAP. However, while a majority of member states permit IFRS for individual financial statements, the EU regulations are silent on this issue. In this article, we outline an in-depth analysis on legal dividend distribution rules interactions with accounting policies in European countries, whether local GAAP or IFRS are applied. We have selected nine cases of potential recognition of unrealised gains in individual financial statements under local GAAP and/or IFRS, some of which are already specified in the EU regulations. For each case, we have analysed the national accounting regulations and the corporate laws. Our analysis reveals that the limitations on dividend distributions recommended by the EU have been most largely implemented in the national regulations, but not in all countries. It also sheds light on potential loopholes in the current European regulation regarding unrealised gains that may be more systematically recognised under IFRS than under local GAAP: unrealised gains arising from the recognition of deferred tax assets and unrealised gains arising from benefit pensions plan. To fill these gaps in the national regulations and to harmonise the legal basis for dividend distribution better within the EU, we suggest including in the European regulation the concept of ‘realised profits’ and thus ‘distributable profits’ as a required basis for dividend distribution. It involves in the first place identifying relevant criteria that may enable disentangling realised and unrealised profits or losses.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting Policies and Dividend Limitation: A European Comparison\",\"authors\":\"Anne Le Manh\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ael-2021-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The adoption of IFRS by the EU has raised issues about its economic consequences in terms of, among others, volatility of corporate profits, taxation of profit and distribution of dividends. Indeed, it has brought the interactions between legal rules for dividend distribution and accounting policies back into focus. The EU company and accounting regulations are based on capital maintenance rules that involve limitations on dividend distribution when certain accounting policies are implemented in individual financial statements under local GAAP. However, while a majority of member states permit IFRS for individual financial statements, the EU regulations are silent on this issue. In this article, we outline an in-depth analysis on legal dividend distribution rules interactions with accounting policies in European countries, whether local GAAP or IFRS are applied. We have selected nine cases of potential recognition of unrealised gains in individual financial statements under local GAAP and/or IFRS, some of which are already specified in the EU regulations. For each case, we have analysed the national accounting regulations and the corporate laws. Our analysis reveals that the limitations on dividend distributions recommended by the EU have been most largely implemented in the national regulations, but not in all countries. It also sheds light on potential loopholes in the current European regulation regarding unrealised gains that may be more systematically recognised under IFRS than under local GAAP: unrealised gains arising from the recognition of deferred tax assets and unrealised gains arising from benefit pensions plan. To fill these gaps in the national regulations and to harmonise the legal basis for dividend distribution better within the EU, we suggest including in the European regulation the concept of ‘realised profits’ and thus ‘distributable profits’ as a required basis for dividend distribution. It involves in the first place identifying relevant criteria that may enable disentangling realised and unrealised profits or losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟采用国际财务报告准则提出了关于其经济后果的问题,其中包括企业利润的波动性,利润的税收和股息的分配。事实上,它使股息分配法律规则与会计政策之间的相互作用重新成为人们关注的焦点。欧盟的公司和会计法规是基于资本维护规则的,当某些会计政策在当地公认会计准则下的个人财务报表中实施时,这些规则涉及对股息分配的限制。然而,虽然大多数成员国允许对单个财务报表使用国际财务报告准则,但欧盟法规对这个问题保持沉默。在本文中,我们将深入分析欧洲国家的法定股息分配规则与会计政策的相互作用,无论采用的是当地的公认会计准则还是国际财务报告准则。我们选择了根据当地公认会计准则和/或国际财务报告准则在个别财务报表中潜在确认未实现收益的九个案例,其中一些已经在欧盟法规中规定。对于每个案例,我们都分析了国家会计法规和公司法。我们的分析表明,欧盟建议的股息分配限制在国家法规中得到了最大程度的实施,但并非所有国家都如此。它还揭示了当前欧洲监管中关于未实现收益的潜在漏洞,这些未实现收益在国际财务报告准则下可能比在当地公认会计准则下更系统地得到确认:来自递延税资产的未实现收益和来自福利养老金计划的未实现收益。为了填补国家法规中的这些空白,并更好地协调欧盟内部股息分配的法律基础,我们建议在欧洲法规中纳入“实现利润”的概念,从而将“可分配利润”作为股息分配的必要基础。它首先涉及确定可能区分已实现和未实现利润或亏损的相关标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Accounting Policies and Dividend Limitation: A European Comparison
Abstract The adoption of IFRS by the EU has raised issues about its economic consequences in terms of, among others, volatility of corporate profits, taxation of profit and distribution of dividends. Indeed, it has brought the interactions between legal rules for dividend distribution and accounting policies back into focus. The EU company and accounting regulations are based on capital maintenance rules that involve limitations on dividend distribution when certain accounting policies are implemented in individual financial statements under local GAAP. However, while a majority of member states permit IFRS for individual financial statements, the EU regulations are silent on this issue. In this article, we outline an in-depth analysis on legal dividend distribution rules interactions with accounting policies in European countries, whether local GAAP or IFRS are applied. We have selected nine cases of potential recognition of unrealised gains in individual financial statements under local GAAP and/or IFRS, some of which are already specified in the EU regulations. For each case, we have analysed the national accounting regulations and the corporate laws. Our analysis reveals that the limitations on dividend distributions recommended by the EU have been most largely implemented in the national regulations, but not in all countries. It also sheds light on potential loopholes in the current European regulation regarding unrealised gains that may be more systematically recognised under IFRS than under local GAAP: unrealised gains arising from the recognition of deferred tax assets and unrealised gains arising from benefit pensions plan. To fill these gaps in the national regulations and to harmonise the legal basis for dividend distribution better within the EU, we suggest including in the European regulation the concept of ‘realised profits’ and thus ‘distributable profits’ as a required basis for dividend distribution. It involves in the first place identifying relevant criteria that may enable disentangling realised and unrealised profits or losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信