政府补贴、信贷分配与投资周期

J. Surti, E. D'souza
{"title":"政府补贴、信贷分配与投资周期","authors":"J. Surti, E. D'souza","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3622947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a model of banking with adverse selection and public guarantees extended to state-owned lenders. We find that while these guarantees induce the banking sector to lend to a larger proportion of firms with positive value, this occurs as a result of a reduction in prudential incentives to screen borrowers by state-owned banks which results in credit supply at a less than actuarially fair price. When the subsidy is tied to evergreening of non-performing loans as opposed to recapitalization post prompt loss recognition, it generates excessive credit allocation to low-productivity, legacy projects at the expense of higher-productivity firms. In the aggregate, this decreases investment, productivity growth and output while increasing financial stability risk. We apply our theoretical predictions to explain the coincidence of rising bank vulnerability and the investment slowdown in India over the last decade.","PeriodicalId":11689,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government Subsidies, Credit Allocation and the Investment Cycle\",\"authors\":\"J. Surti, E. D'souza\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3622947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a model of banking with adverse selection and public guarantees extended to state-owned lenders. We find that while these guarantees induce the banking sector to lend to a larger proportion of firms with positive value, this occurs as a result of a reduction in prudential incentives to screen borrowers by state-owned banks which results in credit supply at a less than actuarially fair price. When the subsidy is tied to evergreening of non-performing loans as opposed to recapitalization post prompt loss recognition, it generates excessive credit allocation to low-productivity, legacy projects at the expense of higher-productivity firms. In the aggregate, this decreases investment, productivity growth and output while increasing financial stability risk. We apply our theoretical predictions to explain the coincidence of rising bank vulnerability and the investment slowdown in India over the last decade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了一个逆向选择和公共担保扩展到国有银行的银行模型。我们发现,虽然这些担保促使银行业向更大比例的具有正价值的公司提供贷款,但这是由于国有银行筛选借款人的审慎激励减少,从而导致信贷供应低于精算公平价格。当补贴与不良贷款的长年累月联系在一起,而不是在及时确认损失后进行资本重组时,它会导致过度的信贷分配给生产率较低的遗留项目,而牺牲生产率较高的公司。总的来说,这会降低投资、生产率增长和产出,同时增加金融稳定风险。我们运用我们的理论预测来解释过去十年印度银行脆弱性上升和投资放缓的巧合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Government Subsidies, Credit Allocation and the Investment Cycle
We present a model of banking with adverse selection and public guarantees extended to state-owned lenders. We find that while these guarantees induce the banking sector to lend to a larger proportion of firms with positive value, this occurs as a result of a reduction in prudential incentives to screen borrowers by state-owned banks which results in credit supply at a less than actuarially fair price. When the subsidy is tied to evergreening of non-performing loans as opposed to recapitalization post prompt loss recognition, it generates excessive credit allocation to low-productivity, legacy projects at the expense of higher-productivity firms. In the aggregate, this decreases investment, productivity growth and output while increasing financial stability risk. We apply our theoretical predictions to explain the coincidence of rising bank vulnerability and the investment slowdown in India over the last decade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信