红松与湿地松混交林生物量模型研究

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 FORESTRY
Renata Reis de Carvalho, Jonathan William Trautenmüller, S. V. Kohler, Edson Luiz Serpe, A. Corte, D. A. Silva, Afonso Figueiredo Filho
{"title":"红松与湿地松混交林生物量模型研究","authors":"Renata Reis de Carvalho, Jonathan William Trautenmüller, S. V. Kohler, Edson Luiz Serpe, A. Corte, D. A. Silva, Afonso Figueiredo Filho","doi":"10.18671/scifor.v50.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare three approaches to fit models to estimate forest biomass in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii with 16 years of age. The data came from the biomass of 60 trees sampled, 30 trees of Pinus taeda and 30 trees of Pinus elliottii. The aerial biomass was estimated through the regression analysis (independent adjustment and simultaneous adjustment) and the artificial intelligence method with the nearest neighbor techniques. The models were selected and compared based on the quality of the statistical indicators: adjusted determination coefficient (Raj), standard error of the relative estimate (Syx%), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Graphical analysis of residuals (%) and the ranking of the models. In the three approaches there were differences in total and component biomass estimates, being this difference associated with the heterogeneity of species (genetic variability by seminal origin), their components, and the lowest correlation of weight with diameter and height (allometric relationships). The technique of the nearest neighbor did not present satisfactory results, its use being recommended for a larger data base. Simultaneous adjustment was similar to the independent fitting method. However, the simultaneous equation has the advantage that when adding the biomass of the components, the result is compatible with the total biomass, which is more satisfactory for the estimation of total biomass.","PeriodicalId":54443,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Forestalis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomass modeling in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda L. and Pinus elliottii Engelm\",\"authors\":\"Renata Reis de Carvalho, Jonathan William Trautenmüller, S. V. Kohler, Edson Luiz Serpe, A. Corte, D. A. Silva, Afonso Figueiredo Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.18671/scifor.v50.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to compare three approaches to fit models to estimate forest biomass in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii with 16 years of age. The data came from the biomass of 60 trees sampled, 30 trees of Pinus taeda and 30 trees of Pinus elliottii. The aerial biomass was estimated through the regression analysis (independent adjustment and simultaneous adjustment) and the artificial intelligence method with the nearest neighbor techniques. The models were selected and compared based on the quality of the statistical indicators: adjusted determination coefficient (Raj), standard error of the relative estimate (Syx%), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Graphical analysis of residuals (%) and the ranking of the models. In the three approaches there were differences in total and component biomass estimates, being this difference associated with the heterogeneity of species (genetic variability by seminal origin), their components, and the lowest correlation of weight with diameter and height (allometric relationships). The technique of the nearest neighbor did not present satisfactory results, its use being recommended for a larger data base. Simultaneous adjustment was similar to the independent fitting method. However, the simultaneous equation has the advantage that when adding the biomass of the components, the result is compatible with the total biomass, which is more satisfactory for the estimation of total biomass.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Forestalis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Forestalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v50.27\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Forestalis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18671/scifor.v50.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种拟合模型估算16年树龄红松和湿地松混交林森林生物量的方法。数据来自于60棵样本树的生物量,其中30棵是红松,30棵是湿地松。通过回归分析(独立平差和同步平差)和最近邻人工智能方法估算空中生物量。根据调整决定系数(Raj)、相对估计标准误差(Syx%)、赤池信息准则(AIC)、贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)、残差图形分析(%)和模型排名等统计指标的质量对模型进行选择和比较。在这三种方法中,总生物量和组分生物量估计值存在差异,这种差异与物种的异质性(种子来源的遗传变异性)及其组分有关,而重量与直径和高度的相关性最低(异速生长关系)。最近邻技术并没有呈现出令人满意的结果,它被推荐用于更大的数据库。同时平差类似于独立拟合方法。但联立方程的优点是,在加入各组分生物量时,结果与总生物量相容,更能满足总生物量的估算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomass modeling in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda L. and Pinus elliottii Engelm
The objective of this study was to compare three approaches to fit models to estimate forest biomass in a mixed plantation of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii with 16 years of age. The data came from the biomass of 60 trees sampled, 30 trees of Pinus taeda and 30 trees of Pinus elliottii. The aerial biomass was estimated through the regression analysis (independent adjustment and simultaneous adjustment) and the artificial intelligence method with the nearest neighbor techniques. The models were selected and compared based on the quality of the statistical indicators: adjusted determination coefficient (Raj), standard error of the relative estimate (Syx%), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Graphical analysis of residuals (%) and the ranking of the models. In the three approaches there were differences in total and component biomass estimates, being this difference associated with the heterogeneity of species (genetic variability by seminal origin), their components, and the lowest correlation of weight with diameter and height (allometric relationships). The technique of the nearest neighbor did not present satisfactory results, its use being recommended for a larger data base. Simultaneous adjustment was similar to the independent fitting method. However, the simultaneous equation has the advantage that when adding the biomass of the components, the result is compatible with the total biomass, which is more satisfactory for the estimation of total biomass.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Forestalis
Scientia Forestalis Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Scientia Forestalis is a scientific publication of the IPEF – Institute of Forest Research and Studies, founded in 1968, as a nonprofit institution, in agreement with the LCF – Department of Forest Sciences of the ESALQ – Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture of the USP – São Paulo University. Scientia Forestalis, affiliated to the ABEC – Brazilian Association of Scientific Publishers, publishes four issues per year of original papers related to the several fields of the Forest Sciences. The Editorial Board is composed by the Editor, the Scientific Editors (evaluating the manuscript), and the Associated Editors (helping on the decision of acceptation or not of the manuscript, analyzed by the Peer-Reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信