超越真实:厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的保护、旅游和代表政治

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
M. Rogers
{"title":"超越真实:厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的保护、旅游和代表政治","authors":"M. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"22 1","pages":"73-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond authenticity: Conservation, tourism, and the politics of representation in the Ecuadorian Amazon\",\"authors\":\"M. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"73-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

摘要

本文描述了一个民族志案例,在这个案例中,同一种族的两个群体在土地和政治权力的冲突中选择了不同的自我表现策略。这场争论被视为种族内部的一场较量,是关于在更大的权力背景下代表现实的能力的较量,而权力背景的参数是由国家和跨国机构设定的。本文将这些民族志问题与人类学表征的政治学联系起来,并参考了最近关于“真实性”问题的辩论以及人类学真理主张对边缘化人群政治斗争的影响,认为当分析中包含更广泛的权力关系背景时,建构主义立场的政治含义就会减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond authenticity: Conservation, tourism, and the politics of representation in the Ecuadorian Amazon
This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Identities explores the relationship of racial, ethnic and national identities and power hierarchies within national and global arenas. It examines the collective representations of social, political, economic and cultural boundaries as aspects of processes of domination, struggle and resistance, and it probes the unidentified and unarticulated class structures and gender relations that remain integral to both maintaining and challenging subordination. Identities responds to the paradox of our time: the growth of a global economy and transnational movements of populations produce or perpetuate distinctive cultural practices and differentiated identities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信