{"title":"超越真实:厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的保护、旅游和代表政治","authors":"M. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":"22 1","pages":"73-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond authenticity: Conservation, tourism, and the politics of representation in the Ecuadorian Amazon\",\"authors\":\"M. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"73-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1996.9962553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond authenticity: Conservation, tourism, and the politics of representation in the Ecuadorian Amazon
This article describes an ethnographic case in which two segments of an ethnically homogeneous population chose divergent strategies of self‐representation in the midst of a conflict over land and political power. The dispute is treated as an intra‐ethnic contest over the capacity to represent reality waged within a larger context of power whose parameters were set by national and transnational agents and institutions. The article relates these ethnographic issues to the poltics of anthropological representation, with reference to recent debates over the question of “authenticity” and the impact of anthropological truth‐claims upon the political struggles of marginalized populations, arguing that the political implications of constructionist positions are mitigated when the broader context of power relations is included in the analysis.
期刊介绍:
Identities explores the relationship of racial, ethnic and national identities and power hierarchies within national and global arenas. It examines the collective representations of social, political, economic and cultural boundaries as aspects of processes of domination, struggle and resistance, and it probes the unidentified and unarticulated class structures and gender relations that remain integral to both maintaining and challenging subordination. Identities responds to the paradox of our time: the growth of a global economy and transnational movements of populations produce or perpetuate distinctive cultural practices and differentiated identities.