Jean-François Uhl , André Cornu-Thenard , Patrick H. Carpentier , Pier Luigi Antignani
{"title":"关注静脉冠状病:慢性静脉疾病的诊断、意义和预测价值","authors":"Jean-François Uhl , André Cornu-Thenard , Patrick H. Carpentier , Pier Luigi Antignani","doi":"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Corona phlebectatica (corona) is a clinical sign associated with chronic venous disorders (CVD). It is a good predictor for skin changes indicating a decompensation of the disease. However, it is not yet included in the clinical part of the CEAP classification, mainly due to the lack of operational criteria for its positive diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To focus on the diagnostic and predictive values of corona, and to answer some relevant questions: How to define relevant operational criteria for a simple and reliable diagnosis in daily practice? Is the diagnosis reproducible? What is the value of this sign for the prognosis of CVD and their treatment?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In order to clinically define corona, the association of blue telangiectases and stasis spots has the best specificity, and the blue telangiectases is the most sensible item. Their associated presence can be considered as a good operational criterion for the positive diagnosis of corona.</p><p>Corona has also shown to be significantly correlated with the presence of incompetent leg perforator veins.</p><p>The presence of corona also has a high value to predict the occurrence of skin changes and venous ulceration in the next few years of evolution of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Corona should no longer be considered as simple telangiectases of the foot (C1). It is a simple and reliable clinical entity, extremely relevant for the severity of the disease.</p><p>This is the reason why a careful examination of the ankle should be done in any patient with CVD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101091,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","volume":"1 2","pages":"Pages 38-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focus on corona phlebectatica: Diagnostic, significance and predictive value in chronic venous disorders\",\"authors\":\"Jean-François Uhl , André Cornu-Thenard , Patrick H. Carpentier , Pier Luigi Antignani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Corona phlebectatica (corona) is a clinical sign associated with chronic venous disorders (CVD). It is a good predictor for skin changes indicating a decompensation of the disease. However, it is not yet included in the clinical part of the CEAP classification, mainly due to the lack of operational criteria for its positive diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To focus on the diagnostic and predictive values of corona, and to answer some relevant questions: How to define relevant operational criteria for a simple and reliable diagnosis in daily practice? Is the diagnosis reproducible? What is the value of this sign for the prognosis of CVD and their treatment?</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In order to clinically define corona, the association of blue telangiectases and stasis spots has the best specificity, and the blue telangiectases is the most sensible item. Their associated presence can be considered as a good operational criterion for the positive diagnosis of corona.</p><p>Corona has also shown to be significantly correlated with the presence of incompetent leg perforator veins.</p><p>The presence of corona also has a high value to predict the occurrence of skin changes and venous ulceration in the next few years of evolution of the disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Corona should no longer be considered as simple telangiectases of the foot (C1). It is a simple and reliable clinical entity, extremely relevant for the severity of the disease.</p><p>This is the reason why a careful examination of the ankle should be done in any patient with CVD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 38-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rvm.2013.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212021113000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Focus on corona phlebectatica: Diagnostic, significance and predictive value in chronic venous disorders
Background
Corona phlebectatica (corona) is a clinical sign associated with chronic venous disorders (CVD). It is a good predictor for skin changes indicating a decompensation of the disease. However, it is not yet included in the clinical part of the CEAP classification, mainly due to the lack of operational criteria for its positive diagnosis.
Aim
To focus on the diagnostic and predictive values of corona, and to answer some relevant questions: How to define relevant operational criteria for a simple and reliable diagnosis in daily practice? Is the diagnosis reproducible? What is the value of this sign for the prognosis of CVD and their treatment?
Results
In order to clinically define corona, the association of blue telangiectases and stasis spots has the best specificity, and the blue telangiectases is the most sensible item. Their associated presence can be considered as a good operational criterion for the positive diagnosis of corona.
Corona has also shown to be significantly correlated with the presence of incompetent leg perforator veins.
The presence of corona also has a high value to predict the occurrence of skin changes and venous ulceration in the next few years of evolution of the disease.
Conclusion
Corona should no longer be considered as simple telangiectases of the foot (C1). It is a simple and reliable clinical entity, extremely relevant for the severity of the disease.
This is the reason why a careful examination of the ankle should be done in any patient with CVD.