COVID-19 igg检测与已知免疫介导性和感染性疾病的交叉反应性

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5685
Nayab Zehra, Muhammad Dilawar Khan, Hijab Batool, O. Chughtai, A. Chughtai, M. Usman
{"title":"COVID-19 igg检测与已知免疫介导性和感染性疾病的交叉反应性","authors":"Nayab Zehra, Muhammad Dilawar Khan, Hijab Batool, O. Chughtai, A. Chughtai, M. Usman","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the cross-reactivity of COVID-19 IgG assay with known immune-mediated and infectious disorders and evaluate for any false-positive reactions to determine the specificity of the serological assay. \nStudy Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Pathology, Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore Pakistan, from Sep to Oct 2020. \nMethodology: A total of 116 samples were included in the study of both males and females. Diagnosed cases of typhoid fever, viral hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), syphilis, multiple connective tissue disorders (MCTD), varicella-zoster infection, rabies, toxoplasmosis, epstein-barr virus (EBV) infection, rubella, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and dengue fever were included in the study. Three samples of multiparous women aged more than 40 years were also included in the study. IgG antibody levels were measured against SARS-CoV-2 with a cut-off index of 1.4. \nResults: Out of 116, only 3 (2%) samples were reactive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2. The categories showing cross-reactivity were typhoid, hepatitis C, and CMV. All specimens showing cross-reactivity were of females. Assay under consideration showed a specificity of 97.4%. \nConclusion: Cross-reactivity was seen in pre-pandemic cases of infectious diseases with COVID-19 IgG antibody assay. Medical lab professionals must verify the serological assays before use in the clinical laboratory to avoid false-positive results.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CROSS-REACTIVITY OF COVID-19 IGG ASSAY WITH KNOWN IMMUNE-MEDIATED AND INFECTIOUS DISORDERS\",\"authors\":\"Nayab Zehra, Muhammad Dilawar Khan, Hijab Batool, O. Chughtai, A. Chughtai, M. Usman\",\"doi\":\"10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the cross-reactivity of COVID-19 IgG assay with known immune-mediated and infectious disorders and evaluate for any false-positive reactions to determine the specificity of the serological assay. \\nStudy Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. \\nPlace and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Pathology, Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore Pakistan, from Sep to Oct 2020. \\nMethodology: A total of 116 samples were included in the study of both males and females. Diagnosed cases of typhoid fever, viral hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), syphilis, multiple connective tissue disorders (MCTD), varicella-zoster infection, rabies, toxoplasmosis, epstein-barr virus (EBV) infection, rubella, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and dengue fever were included in the study. Three samples of multiparous women aged more than 40 years were also included in the study. IgG antibody levels were measured against SARS-CoV-2 with a cut-off index of 1.4. \\nResults: Out of 116, only 3 (2%) samples were reactive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2. The categories showing cross-reactivity were typhoid, hepatitis C, and CMV. All specimens showing cross-reactivity were of females. Assay under consideration showed a specificity of 97.4%. \\nConclusion: Cross-reactivity was seen in pre-pandemic cases of infectious diseases with COVID-19 IgG antibody assay. Medical lab professionals must verify the serological assays before use in the clinical laboratory to avoid false-positive results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAFMJ\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAFMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v6i6.5685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估COVID-19 IgG检测与已知免疫介导性和感染性疾病的交叉反应性,并评估是否存在假阳性反应,以确定血清学检测的特异性。研究设计:横断面分析研究。学习地点和时间:2020年9月至10月,巴基斯坦拉合尔Chughtai病理研究所化学病理学系。方法:共纳入116个样本,男女均有。确诊病例包括伤寒、病毒性肝炎、系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)、梅毒、多发性结缔组织疾病(MCTD)、水痘带状疱疹感染、狂犬病、弓形虫病、eb病毒(EBV)感染、风疹、类风湿关节炎、艾滋病、巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染和登革热。研究中还包括三名年龄在40岁以上的多胎妇女。检测SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体水平,截断指数为1.4。结果:116份样本中,仅有3份(2%)IgG抗体阳性。显示交叉反应的类型有伤寒、丙型肝炎和巨细胞病毒。所有具有交叉反应性的标本均为雌性。正在考虑的检测显示特异性为97.4%。结论:COVID-19 IgG抗体检测在大流行前传染病病例中发现交叉反应性。医学实验室专业人员在临床实验室使用血清学分析之前必须对其进行验证,以避免出现假阳性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CROSS-REACTIVITY OF COVID-19 IGG ASSAY WITH KNOWN IMMUNE-MEDIATED AND INFECTIOUS DISORDERS
Objective: To assess the cross-reactivity of COVID-19 IgG assay with known immune-mediated and infectious disorders and evaluate for any false-positive reactions to determine the specificity of the serological assay. Study Design: Cross-sectional analytical study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Pathology, Chughtai Institute of Pathology, Lahore Pakistan, from Sep to Oct 2020. Methodology: A total of 116 samples were included in the study of both males and females. Diagnosed cases of typhoid fever, viral hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), syphilis, multiple connective tissue disorders (MCTD), varicella-zoster infection, rabies, toxoplasmosis, epstein-barr virus (EBV) infection, rubella, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and dengue fever were included in the study. Three samples of multiparous women aged more than 40 years were also included in the study. IgG antibody levels were measured against SARS-CoV-2 with a cut-off index of 1.4. Results: Out of 116, only 3 (2%) samples were reactive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2. The categories showing cross-reactivity were typhoid, hepatitis C, and CMV. All specimens showing cross-reactivity were of females. Assay under consideration showed a specificity of 97.4%. Conclusion: Cross-reactivity was seen in pre-pandemic cases of infectious diseases with COVID-19 IgG antibody assay. Medical lab professionals must verify the serological assays before use in the clinical laboratory to avoid false-positive results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信