{"title":"从牙科汞合金废料中回收银和汞","authors":"C.W. Lee, K.W. Fung","doi":"10.1016/0304-3967(81)90017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A simple, inexpensive scheme was developed to recover silver and mercury from silver-tin dental amalgam waste. Direct distillation of the amalgam under reduced pressure yielded 99.22 ± 0.68% pure mercury with 87.7 ± 3.6% recovery. It was shown that the recovered mercury could possibly be further purified to 100.03 ± 0.14% by redistillation. Silver was isolated from the residue as silver chloride, which was then converted to silver oxide and diamino-silver(I) complex for chemical reduction by glucose and electrochemical reduction, respectively. The former method recovered 92.4 ± 2.5% silver of 99.5 ± 1.1% purity; the latter yielded silver with a slightly lower recovery, 89.9 ± 3.1%, but higher purity, 99.99 ± 0.17%. Parameters governing the two recovery routes were also investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101078,"journal":{"name":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 363-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(81)90017-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery of silver and mercury from dental amalgam waste\",\"authors\":\"C.W. Lee, K.W. Fung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3967(81)90017-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A simple, inexpensive scheme was developed to recover silver and mercury from silver-tin dental amalgam waste. Direct distillation of the amalgam under reduced pressure yielded 99.22 ± 0.68% pure mercury with 87.7 ± 3.6% recovery. It was shown that the recovered mercury could possibly be further purified to 100.03 ± 0.14% by redistillation. Silver was isolated from the residue as silver chloride, which was then converted to silver oxide and diamino-silver(I) complex for chemical reduction by glucose and electrochemical reduction, respectively. The former method recovered 92.4 ± 2.5% silver of 99.5 ± 1.1% purity; the latter yielded silver with a slightly lower recovery, 89.9 ± 3.1%, but higher purity, 99.99 ± 0.17%. Parameters governing the two recovery routes were also investigated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 363-371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(81)90017-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304396781900172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304396781900172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recovery of silver and mercury from dental amalgam waste
A simple, inexpensive scheme was developed to recover silver and mercury from silver-tin dental amalgam waste. Direct distillation of the amalgam under reduced pressure yielded 99.22 ± 0.68% pure mercury with 87.7 ± 3.6% recovery. It was shown that the recovered mercury could possibly be further purified to 100.03 ± 0.14% by redistillation. Silver was isolated from the residue as silver chloride, which was then converted to silver oxide and diamino-silver(I) complex for chemical reduction by glucose and electrochemical reduction, respectively. The former method recovered 92.4 ± 2.5% silver of 99.5 ± 1.1% purity; the latter yielded silver with a slightly lower recovery, 89.9 ± 3.1%, but higher purity, 99.99 ± 0.17%. Parameters governing the two recovery routes were also investigated.