中欧和东欧电信管理改革

Economics of Transition Pub Date : 1996-10-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1468-0351.1996.TB00174.X

M. Armstrong, J. Vickers

{"title":"中欧和东欧电信管理改革","authors":"M. Armstrong, J. Vickers","doi":"10.1111/J.1468-0351.1996.TB00174.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we discuss public policy towards the telecommunications sector in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), focusing primarily on the need to ensure adequate capital investment. The analysis falls into two main parts: the regulation of monopoly, and policy on liberalization. Concerning regulation, we discuss how policy credibility is likely to be a problem in the region, and how reputational considerations, the design of regulatory institutions, and methods of price control can help to ameliorate this problem. Concerning liberalization, we consider the effects of potential competition on investment incentives, and construct a simple model to analyse the different effects of liberalization and regulatory risk on investment. Some preliminary policy conclusions are drawn, and we argue that in the CEE region - in contrast to more well developed countries - a reasonable case can be made for allowing a temporary period of monopoly for basic services. Copyright 1996 The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.","PeriodicalId":47148,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition","volume":"42 1","pages":"295-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory reform in telecommunications in Central and Eastern Europe\",\"authors\":\"M. Armstrong, J. Vickers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1468-0351.1996.TB00174.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we discuss public policy towards the telecommunications sector in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), focusing primarily on the need to ensure adequate capital investment. The analysis falls into two main parts: the regulation of monopoly, and policy on liberalization. Concerning regulation, we discuss how policy credibility is likely to be a problem in the region, and how reputational considerations, the design of regulatory institutions, and methods of price control can help to ameliorate this problem. Concerning liberalization, we consider the effects of potential competition on investment incentives, and construct a simple model to analyse the different effects of liberalization and regulatory risk on investment. Some preliminary policy conclusions are drawn, and we argue that in the CEE region - in contrast to more well developed countries - a reasonable case can be made for allowing a temporary period of monopoly for basic services. Copyright 1996 The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transition\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"295-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0351.1996.TB00174.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0351.1996.TB00174.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 35

摘要

在本文中，我们讨论了中欧和东欧(CEE)电信部门的公共政策，主要关注确保充足资本投资的必要性。分析主要分为两个部分:垄断规制和自由化政策。在监管方面，我们讨论了政策可信度如何可能成为该地区的一个问题，以及声誉考虑、监管机构设计和价格控制方法如何有助于改善这一问题。在自由化方面，我们考虑了潜在竞争对投资激励的影响，并构建了一个简单的模型来分析自由化和监管风险对投资的不同影响。我们得出了一些初步的政策结论，我们认为，与更发达的国家相比，在中东欧地区，允许对基本服务实行暂时垄断是合理的。版权所有1996年欧洲复兴开发银行。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Regulatory reform in telecommunications in Central and Eastern Europe

In this paper we discuss public policy towards the telecommunications sector in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), focusing primarily on the need to ensure adequate capital investment. The analysis falls into two main parts: the regulation of monopoly, and policy on liberalization. Concerning regulation, we discuss how policy credibility is likely to be a problem in the region, and how reputational considerations, the design of regulatory institutions, and methods of price control can help to ameliorate this problem. Concerning liberalization, we consider the effects of potential competition on investment incentives, and construct a simple model to analyse the different effects of liberalization and regulatory risk on investment. Some preliminary policy conclusions are drawn, and we argue that in the CEE region - in contrast to more well developed countries - a reasonable case can be made for allowing a temporary period of monopoly for basic services. Copyright 1996 The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economics of Transition ECONOMICS-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Economics of Transition publishes high-quality, refereed articles on the economics of structural transformation, institutional development, and growth. It presents innovative theoretical work and econometric analyses of the process of economic reform and its macroeconomic effects. The journal aims to promote new thinking on how institutions and institutional change can be analyzed and measured and how their impact on aggregate economic performance can be evaluated.