定义和评估物联网环境中的质量:调查

Aggeliki Sgora, P. Chatzimisios
{"title":"定义和评估物联网环境中的质量:调查","authors":"Aggeliki Sgora, P. Chatzimisios","doi":"10.3390/iot3040026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of multimedia services, Quality of Experience (QoE) has gained a lot of attention. QoE ties together the users’ needs and expectations to multimedia application and network performance. However, in various Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as healthcare, surveillance systems, traffic monitoring, etc., human feedback can be limited or infeasible. Moreover, for immersive augmented and virtual reality, as well as other mulsemedia applications, the evaluation in terms of quality cannot only focus on the sight and hearing senses. Therefore, the traditional QoE definition and approaches for evaluating multimedia services might not be suitable for the IoT paradigm, and more quality metrics are required in order to evaluate the quality in IoT. In this paper, we review existing quality definitions, quality influence factors (IFs) and assessment approaches for IoT. This paper also introduces challenges in the area of quality assessment for the IoT paradigm.","PeriodicalId":6745,"journal":{"name":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and Assessing Quality in IoT Environments: A Survey\",\"authors\":\"Aggeliki Sgora, P. Chatzimisios\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/iot3040026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the proliferation of multimedia services, Quality of Experience (QoE) has gained a lot of attention. QoE ties together the users’ needs and expectations to multimedia application and network performance. However, in various Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as healthcare, surveillance systems, traffic monitoring, etc., human feedback can be limited or infeasible. Moreover, for immersive augmented and virtual reality, as well as other mulsemedia applications, the evaluation in terms of quality cannot only focus on the sight and hearing senses. Therefore, the traditional QoE definition and approaches for evaluating multimedia services might not be suitable for the IoT paradigm, and more quality metrics are required in order to evaluate the quality in IoT. In this paper, we review existing quality definitions, quality influence factors (IFs) and assessment approaches for IoT. This paper also introduces challenges in the area of quality assessment for the IoT paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3040026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iot3040026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着多媒体业务的蓬勃发展,体验质量(Quality of Experience, QoE)受到了广泛的关注。QoE将用户的需求和期望与多媒体应用程序和网络性能联系在一起。然而,在各种物联网(IoT)应用中,如医疗保健、监控系统、交通监控等,人工反馈可能是有限的或不可行的。此外,对于沉浸式增强现实和虚拟现实以及其他多媒体应用,质量的评价不能只关注视觉和听觉。因此,传统的QoE定义和评估多媒体服务的方法可能不适合物联网范式,需要更多的质量指标来评估物联网中的质量。在本文中,我们回顾了现有的物联网质量定义、质量影响因素(if)和评估方法。本文还介绍了物联网范式质量评估领域的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining and Assessing Quality in IoT Environments: A Survey
With the proliferation of multimedia services, Quality of Experience (QoE) has gained a lot of attention. QoE ties together the users’ needs and expectations to multimedia application and network performance. However, in various Internet of Things (IoT) applications such as healthcare, surveillance systems, traffic monitoring, etc., human feedback can be limited or infeasible. Moreover, for immersive augmented and virtual reality, as well as other mulsemedia applications, the evaluation in terms of quality cannot only focus on the sight and hearing senses. Therefore, the traditional QoE definition and approaches for evaluating multimedia services might not be suitable for the IoT paradigm, and more quality metrics are required in order to evaluate the quality in IoT. In this paper, we review existing quality definitions, quality influence factors (IFs) and assessment approaches for IoT. This paper also introduces challenges in the area of quality assessment for the IoT paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信