伪粘拉——海洋电缆测井图像测井的一种新老伪影

Sofia Alves Fornero, Lenita de Souza Fioriti, A. P. C. Laier, Gabriel Da Silva Felipe
{"title":"伪粘拉——海洋电缆测井图像测井的一种新老伪影","authors":"Sofia Alves Fornero, Lenita de Souza Fioriti, A. P. C. Laier, Gabriel Da Silva Felipe","doi":"10.4043/29935-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The \"pseudo-sticking and pull\", also nicknamed \"blocky effect\" (because of its general aspect), is a common acquisition artifact that reduces considerably the quality of wireline acoustic and microresistive image logs, even though it is not well known among image log interpreters, well-site geologists and engineers. This artifact is generated by heave motion influence when the wave movement is not minimized enough by the compensation systems during offshore wireline operations. In fact, it is well known that the linear or rotary compensator systems reduce the heave variance between 52-80% and, sometimes, other factors such as string weight and fluid density can affect, significantly, wireline logs quality by the heave variance not well compensated. In this case, mainly the wireline stationary tools and the ones that need lower acquisition speed, present depth uncertainties that may cause relevant problems. The image logs are largely used in pre-salt reservoirs for geomechanics, petrophysics, structural, sedimentological and stratigraphic studies due to their great contrast responses on carbonates. However, because acoustic image logs run at speeds around 425 ft/h (against 3600 ft/h from basic logs) and acquire between 180 and 250 samples data each 0,2 inches depth, this log becomes more affected by this artifact than the microresistive one (over 1500 ft/h). The residual heave affects directly the image quality by creating \"pseudo-sticking and pull\" at each wave period, distorting the image log significantly. Besides the artifact that immediately appears on the image during the logging, the residual heave can also be confirmed by observing when cable tension and vector Z accelerometer variation have the same frequency as the period of ocean waves, monitored by the meteo-oceanographic daily reports. Even though this artifact can be minimized with processing (better than true sticking and pull corrections), the loss of quality should be considered. Petrobras experience has also shown that interventions directly on the source by adjusting compensators and changing steering towards can be effective to handle this problem. In order to help the interested community in acquiring better data with minimum costs, this work shows some examples of this artifact on acoustic image logs from pre-salt wells. It can also show the results with processing, the differences reached after adjusting compensators and demands for future works.","PeriodicalId":10927,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pseudo-Sticking and Pull – A New Old Artifact on Image Logs Acquired in Ocean Wireline Log Operations\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Alves Fornero, Lenita de Souza Fioriti, A. P. C. Laier, Gabriel Da Silva Felipe\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29935-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The \\\"pseudo-sticking and pull\\\", also nicknamed \\\"blocky effect\\\" (because of its general aspect), is a common acquisition artifact that reduces considerably the quality of wireline acoustic and microresistive image logs, even though it is not well known among image log interpreters, well-site geologists and engineers. This artifact is generated by heave motion influence when the wave movement is not minimized enough by the compensation systems during offshore wireline operations. In fact, it is well known that the linear or rotary compensator systems reduce the heave variance between 52-80% and, sometimes, other factors such as string weight and fluid density can affect, significantly, wireline logs quality by the heave variance not well compensated. In this case, mainly the wireline stationary tools and the ones that need lower acquisition speed, present depth uncertainties that may cause relevant problems. The image logs are largely used in pre-salt reservoirs for geomechanics, petrophysics, structural, sedimentological and stratigraphic studies due to their great contrast responses on carbonates. However, because acoustic image logs run at speeds around 425 ft/h (against 3600 ft/h from basic logs) and acquire between 180 and 250 samples data each 0,2 inches depth, this log becomes more affected by this artifact than the microresistive one (over 1500 ft/h). The residual heave affects directly the image quality by creating \\\"pseudo-sticking and pull\\\" at each wave period, distorting the image log significantly. Besides the artifact that immediately appears on the image during the logging, the residual heave can also be confirmed by observing when cable tension and vector Z accelerometer variation have the same frequency as the period of ocean waves, monitored by the meteo-oceanographic daily reports. Even though this artifact can be minimized with processing (better than true sticking and pull corrections), the loss of quality should be considered. Petrobras experience has also shown that interventions directly on the source by adjusting compensators and changing steering towards can be effective to handle this problem. In order to help the interested community in acquiring better data with minimum costs, this work shows some examples of this artifact on acoustic image logs from pre-salt wells. It can also show the results with processing, the differences reached after adjusting compensators and demands for future works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29935-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 31, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29935-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“伪卡拔效应”,也被称为“块状效应”(因为它的普遍性),是一种常见的采集伪影,它会大大降低电缆声波和微电阻成像测井的质量,尽管它在图像测井解释人员、井场地质学家和工程师中并不为人所熟知。在海上电缆作业中,当补偿系统没有将波浪运动最小化时,就会产生升沉运动影响。事实上,众所周知,线性或旋转补偿器系统可以减少52-80%的起伏变化,有时,其他因素,如管柱重量和流体密度,会显著影响电缆测井质量,因为起伏变化没有得到很好的补偿。在这种情况下,主要是电缆固定工具和需要较低采集速度的工具,存在深度不确定性,可能会导致相关问题。由于图像测井对碳酸盐岩具有很强的对比响应,因此被广泛用于盐下储层的地质力学、岩石物理、构造、沉积学和地层学研究。然而,由于声波成像测井的运行速度约为425英尺/小时(基本测井为3600英尺/小时),并且每0.2英寸深度采集180至250个样本数据,因此声波成像测井比微电阻测井(超过1500英尺/小时)更容易受到伪影的影响。残余隆起通过在每个波周期产生“伪粘拉”直接影响图像质量,严重扭曲图像日志。除了在测井过程中立即出现在图像上的伪影外,还可以通过观测当电缆张力和矢量Z加速度计的变化与海浪周期的频率相同时,通过气象海洋日报监测来确认残余起伏。即使这种工件可以通过加工最小化(比真正的粘和拉修正更好),也应该考虑到质量损失。巴西国家石油公司的经验也表明,通过调整补偿器和改变转向,直接对源头进行干预,可以有效地解决这个问题。为了帮助有兴趣的团体以最小的成本获得更好的数据,本工作展示了盐下井声学图像测井的一些例子。还可以显示处理后的结果、调整补偿器后的差异以及对今后工作的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pseudo-Sticking and Pull – A New Old Artifact on Image Logs Acquired in Ocean Wireline Log Operations
The "pseudo-sticking and pull", also nicknamed "blocky effect" (because of its general aspect), is a common acquisition artifact that reduces considerably the quality of wireline acoustic and microresistive image logs, even though it is not well known among image log interpreters, well-site geologists and engineers. This artifact is generated by heave motion influence when the wave movement is not minimized enough by the compensation systems during offshore wireline operations. In fact, it is well known that the linear or rotary compensator systems reduce the heave variance between 52-80% and, sometimes, other factors such as string weight and fluid density can affect, significantly, wireline logs quality by the heave variance not well compensated. In this case, mainly the wireline stationary tools and the ones that need lower acquisition speed, present depth uncertainties that may cause relevant problems. The image logs are largely used in pre-salt reservoirs for geomechanics, petrophysics, structural, sedimentological and stratigraphic studies due to their great contrast responses on carbonates. However, because acoustic image logs run at speeds around 425 ft/h (against 3600 ft/h from basic logs) and acquire between 180 and 250 samples data each 0,2 inches depth, this log becomes more affected by this artifact than the microresistive one (over 1500 ft/h). The residual heave affects directly the image quality by creating "pseudo-sticking and pull" at each wave period, distorting the image log significantly. Besides the artifact that immediately appears on the image during the logging, the residual heave can also be confirmed by observing when cable tension and vector Z accelerometer variation have the same frequency as the period of ocean waves, monitored by the meteo-oceanographic daily reports. Even though this artifact can be minimized with processing (better than true sticking and pull corrections), the loss of quality should be considered. Petrobras experience has also shown that interventions directly on the source by adjusting compensators and changing steering towards can be effective to handle this problem. In order to help the interested community in acquiring better data with minimum costs, this work shows some examples of this artifact on acoustic image logs from pre-salt wells. It can also show the results with processing, the differences reached after adjusting compensators and demands for future works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信