Q3 Social Sciences
Adrianna Szczechowicz-Raś
{"title":"MOŻLIWOŚĆ WYBORU MIĘDZY ŚWIADCZENIEM PIELĘGNACYJNYM A SPECJALNYM ZASIŁKIEM OPIEKUŃCZYM – PROBLEMY PRAKTYCZNE","authors":"Adrianna Szczechowicz-Raś","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-95.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the provisions of law and jurisprudence in the aspect of the\npossibility for the beneficiary to choose a nursing benefit when a special care allowance\nhas already been granted by an earlier decision. The main objective of the article is to\nindicate the interpretation of the provision used in the previous practice by the authorities\nand the current problems presented in the jurisprudence of administrative courts\nthat affect the statutory right of a party to choose a benefit. In the author’s opinion,\nthe legislator does not take into account the changing economic and social situation in\nthe adopted legal solutions, which is controversial in practice. The lack of legislative\ninitiative in this regard leaves the judicature with the problem of non-compliance with\nthe provisions. Administrative courts are forced to correct structural imperfections of the\nsocial security system in terms of support for carers of people with disabilities, which\nshould not take place in a democratic state, as it is the sole role of the legislator.","PeriodicalId":36157,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-95.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从法律和法理的规定出发,分析了在特殊护理津贴已被先行裁定的情况下,受益人选择护理津贴的可能性。本文的主要目的是指出当局对以往实践中使用的条款的解释以及当前行政法院判例中出现的影响当事人选择利益的法定权利的问题。在作者看来,立法者在通过的法律解决方案中没有考虑到不断变化的经济和社会状况,这在实践中是有争议的。由于在这方面缺乏立法主动性,司法部门面临着不遵守规定的问题。行政法院被迫纠正社会保障制度在支持残疾人照顾者方面的结构性缺陷,这在民主国家不应该发生,因为这是立法者的唯一角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MOŻLIWOŚĆ WYBORU MIĘDZY ŚWIADCZENIEM PIELĘGNACYJNYM A SPECJALNYM ZASIŁKIEM OPIEKUŃCZYM – PROBLEMY PRAKTYCZNE
The article analyzes the provisions of law and jurisprudence in the aspect of the possibility for the beneficiary to choose a nursing benefit when a special care allowance has already been granted by an earlier decision. The main objective of the article is to indicate the interpretation of the provision used in the previous practice by the authorities and the current problems presented in the jurisprudence of administrative courts that affect the statutory right of a party to choose a benefit. In the author’s opinion, the legislator does not take into account the changing economic and social situation in the adopted legal solutions, which is controversial in practice. The lack of legislative initiative in this regard leaves the judicature with the problem of non-compliance with the provisions. Administrative courts are forced to correct structural imperfections of the social security system in terms of support for carers of people with disabilities, which should not take place in a democratic state, as it is the sole role of the legislator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信