在初级保健诊所就诊的低收入广泛性焦虑障碍患者的医疗服务利用与生活质量

G. Jones, S. Ames, S. Jeffries, I. Scarinci, P. Brantley
{"title":"在初级保健诊所就诊的低收入广泛性焦虑障碍患者的医疗服务利用与生活质量","authors":"G. Jones, S. Ames, S. Jeffries, I. Scarinci, P. Brantley","doi":"10.2190/2X44-CR14-YHJC-9EQ3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anxiety disorders appear to influence morbidity and medical utilization. However, little is known about the relationship between Generalized Anxiety Disorder, quality of life, and medical utilization, especially among low-income patients. The goals of this investigation were to 1) determine if low-income patients with GAD utilize medical services more than patients with other Axis I diagnoses, or no psychopathology, and 2) compare the health-related quality of life of these three groups. Method: Participants were randomly recruited from public primary care clinics and administered intake assessments of demographics, stress, and health-related self-report questionnaires. At the end of the first year a structured psychiatric interview was administered (N = 431). Over the second year, patients (n = 360) were administered a health-related quality of life measure every three months for four assessments. Medical charts were abstracted to collect information about chronic illnesses and visits to outpatient clinics and the emergency department during the two years. Results: Patients were predominantly middle-aged, low-income, uninsured African-American females. In this low-income sample, patients with GAD utilized the emergency department more and reported poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Conclusion: Low-income patients with GAD utilize the emergency department more and report poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Programs to identify and treat patients with GAD may yield improvements in quality of life, as well as reduce emergency department utilization.","PeriodicalId":22510,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":"42 1","pages":"183 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Medical Services and Quality of Life among Low-Income Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder Attending Primary Care Clinics\",\"authors\":\"G. Jones, S. Ames, S. Jeffries, I. Scarinci, P. Brantley\",\"doi\":\"10.2190/2X44-CR14-YHJC-9EQ3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Anxiety disorders appear to influence morbidity and medical utilization. However, little is known about the relationship between Generalized Anxiety Disorder, quality of life, and medical utilization, especially among low-income patients. The goals of this investigation were to 1) determine if low-income patients with GAD utilize medical services more than patients with other Axis I diagnoses, or no psychopathology, and 2) compare the health-related quality of life of these three groups. Method: Participants were randomly recruited from public primary care clinics and administered intake assessments of demographics, stress, and health-related self-report questionnaires. At the end of the first year a structured psychiatric interview was administered (N = 431). Over the second year, patients (n = 360) were administered a health-related quality of life measure every three months for four assessments. Medical charts were abstracted to collect information about chronic illnesses and visits to outpatient clinics and the emergency department during the two years. Results: Patients were predominantly middle-aged, low-income, uninsured African-American females. In this low-income sample, patients with GAD utilized the emergency department more and reported poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Conclusion: Low-income patients with GAD utilize the emergency department more and report poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Programs to identify and treat patients with GAD may yield improvements in quality of life, as well as reduce emergency department utilization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2190/2X44-CR14-YHJC-9EQ3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/2X44-CR14-YHJC-9EQ3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

目的:焦虑障碍似乎影响发病率和医疗利用。然而,对广泛性焦虑障碍、生活质量和医疗利用之间的关系知之甚少,特别是在低收入患者中。本研究的目的是:1)确定低收入广谱性焦虑症患者是否比其他轴I诊断的患者或无精神病理的患者更多地利用医疗服务;2)比较这三组患者的健康相关生活质量。方法:从公立初级保健诊所随机招募参与者,并进行人口统计、压力和健康相关自我报告问卷的摄入评估。在第一年结束时,进行了一次结构化的精神病学访谈(N = 431)。在第二年,患者(n = 360)每三个月接受一次与健康相关的生活质量测量,共进行四项评估。提取医疗图表,收集两年内慢性病和门诊及急诊就诊信息。结果:患者主要为中年、低收入、无保险的非裔美国女性。在这个低收入样本中,广泛性焦虑症患者比其他I轴障碍患者和没有任何精神病理的患者更多地使用急诊科,并且报告的生活质量更差。结论:低收入广泛性焦虑症患者比其他I轴障碍患者和无任何精神病理的患者更多地使用急诊科,报告的生活质量更差。识别和治疗广泛性焦虑症患者的计划可能会改善生活质量,并减少急诊室的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of Medical Services and Quality of Life among Low-Income Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder Attending Primary Care Clinics
Objective: Anxiety disorders appear to influence morbidity and medical utilization. However, little is known about the relationship between Generalized Anxiety Disorder, quality of life, and medical utilization, especially among low-income patients. The goals of this investigation were to 1) determine if low-income patients with GAD utilize medical services more than patients with other Axis I diagnoses, or no psychopathology, and 2) compare the health-related quality of life of these three groups. Method: Participants were randomly recruited from public primary care clinics and administered intake assessments of demographics, stress, and health-related self-report questionnaires. At the end of the first year a structured psychiatric interview was administered (N = 431). Over the second year, patients (n = 360) were administered a health-related quality of life measure every three months for four assessments. Medical charts were abstracted to collect information about chronic illnesses and visits to outpatient clinics and the emergency department during the two years. Results: Patients were predominantly middle-aged, low-income, uninsured African-American females. In this low-income sample, patients with GAD utilized the emergency department more and reported poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Conclusion: Low-income patients with GAD utilize the emergency department more and report poorer quality of life than patients with other Axis I disorders and patients without any psychopathology. Programs to identify and treat patients with GAD may yield improvements in quality of life, as well as reduce emergency department utilization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信