南非推广绿色建筑的激励机制

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE
E. Simpeh, J. Smallwood
{"title":"南非推广绿色建筑的激励机制","authors":"E. Simpeh, J. Smallwood","doi":"10.1108/ohi-01-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe green building (GB) market is maturing after years of practice; therefore, incentives for promoting GB should be adapted to reflect the market transformation. Adapting incentives can positively influence stakeholders' motives, which in turn change stakeholders' behavioural intention towards GBs. Hence, this study aims to examine the parameters influencing the decision to adopt GB and to ascertain how incentive mechanisms promote the uptake of GB in South Africa.Design/methodology/approachUsing a scoping literature review and a sequential mixed research method, primary data were acquired from GB experts in four South African provinces. In analysing the quantitative data, the factors were ranked hierarchically using the mean ranking technique and factor analysis was computed to identify the underlying GB incentives. The qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.FindingsThe results indicate that incentive payment from a utility energy efficiency programme, rebates and discounts relating to environmentally friendly materials and products and providing grants to homeowners and developers to go towards certification were the most essential monetary incentives for promoting GB. In the category of non-monetary incentives, recognition of consultant team members and developers and free marketing/good publicity were the most important incentives. The incentive mechanisms were subsequently categorised as “Economic incentives” and “Reward scheme and technical support”.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was confined to four metropolitan areas in South Africa. Nevertheless, the outcomes have practical implications for GB projects in general and may serve as a good reference for other provinces in South Africa.Originality/valueThe findings of the study are a valuable resource for stakeholders such as the government, municipal assemblies, professional bodies and the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA) in developing effective incentive mechanisms to promote GB adoption. This study adds to the body of knowledge relevant to GB incentivisation in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentive mechanism for promoting the uptake of green building in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"E. Simpeh, J. Smallwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ohi-01-2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe green building (GB) market is maturing after years of practice; therefore, incentives for promoting GB should be adapted to reflect the market transformation. Adapting incentives can positively influence stakeholders' motives, which in turn change stakeholders' behavioural intention towards GBs. Hence, this study aims to examine the parameters influencing the decision to adopt GB and to ascertain how incentive mechanisms promote the uptake of GB in South Africa.Design/methodology/approachUsing a scoping literature review and a sequential mixed research method, primary data were acquired from GB experts in four South African provinces. In analysing the quantitative data, the factors were ranked hierarchically using the mean ranking technique and factor analysis was computed to identify the underlying GB incentives. The qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.FindingsThe results indicate that incentive payment from a utility energy efficiency programme, rebates and discounts relating to environmentally friendly materials and products and providing grants to homeowners and developers to go towards certification were the most essential monetary incentives for promoting GB. In the category of non-monetary incentives, recognition of consultant team members and developers and free marketing/good publicity were the most important incentives. The incentive mechanisms were subsequently categorised as “Economic incentives” and “Reward scheme and technical support”.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was confined to four metropolitan areas in South Africa. Nevertheless, the outcomes have practical implications for GB projects in general and may serve as a good reference for other provinces in South Africa.Originality/valueThe findings of the study are a valuable resource for stakeholders such as the government, municipal assemblies, professional bodies and the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA) in developing effective incentive mechanisms to promote GB adoption. This study adds to the body of knowledge relevant to GB incentivisation in South Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open House International\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open House International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-01-2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-01-2023-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的经过多年的实践,绿色建筑市场日趋成熟;因此,促进国产化的激励措施应适应市场转型。适应性激励可以正向影响利益相关者的动机,从而改变利益相关者对企业治理的行为意愿。因此,本研究旨在研究影响南非采用GB决策的参数,并确定激励机制如何促进GB的采用。设计/方法/方法使用范围文献综述和顺序混合研究方法,从南非四个省的GB专家那里获得了原始数据。在分析定量数据时,使用均值排序技术对因素进行分层排序,并计算因子分析以确定潜在的GB激励。采用内容分析法对定性资料进行分析。研究结果表明,来自公用事业能效计划的激励付款,与环保材料和产品相关的回扣和折扣,以及向房主和开发商提供补助金以获得认证,是推广GB最重要的货币激励措施。在非金钱奖励方面,对顾问团队成员和开发人员的认可以及免费营销/良好宣传是最重要的奖励。奖励机制随后分为“经济奖励”和“奖励计划及技术支援”。研究局限/意义本研究仅限于南非的四个大都市地区。尽管如此,研究结果对一般GB项目具有实际意义,并可作为南非其他省份的良好参考。独创性/价值本研究的发现对政府、市政议会、专业机构和南非绿色建筑委员会(GBCSA)等利益相关者在制定有效的激励机制以促进GB采用方面提供了宝贵的资源。这项研究增加了与南非GB激励相关的知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incentive mechanism for promoting the uptake of green building in South Africa
PurposeThe green building (GB) market is maturing after years of practice; therefore, incentives for promoting GB should be adapted to reflect the market transformation. Adapting incentives can positively influence stakeholders' motives, which in turn change stakeholders' behavioural intention towards GBs. Hence, this study aims to examine the parameters influencing the decision to adopt GB and to ascertain how incentive mechanisms promote the uptake of GB in South Africa.Design/methodology/approachUsing a scoping literature review and a sequential mixed research method, primary data were acquired from GB experts in four South African provinces. In analysing the quantitative data, the factors were ranked hierarchically using the mean ranking technique and factor analysis was computed to identify the underlying GB incentives. The qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.FindingsThe results indicate that incentive payment from a utility energy efficiency programme, rebates and discounts relating to environmentally friendly materials and products and providing grants to homeowners and developers to go towards certification were the most essential monetary incentives for promoting GB. In the category of non-monetary incentives, recognition of consultant team members and developers and free marketing/good publicity were the most important incentives. The incentive mechanisms were subsequently categorised as “Economic incentives” and “Reward scheme and technical support”.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was confined to four metropolitan areas in South Africa. Nevertheless, the outcomes have practical implications for GB projects in general and may serve as a good reference for other provinces in South Africa.Originality/valueThe findings of the study are a valuable resource for stakeholders such as the government, municipal assemblies, professional bodies and the Green Building Council of South Africa (GBCSA) in developing effective incentive mechanisms to promote GB adoption. This study adds to the body of knowledge relevant to GB incentivisation in South Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信