Nitiflex手K锉、Proglider锉和path锉对根尖弯曲根管运输和同心度影响的体外比较研究。

Saloni Vijaywargiya, Harshit Srivastava, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B Prasad, Prachi Mital, Avneet Kaur
{"title":"Nitiflex手K锉、Proglider锉和path锉对根尖弯曲根管运输和同心度影响的体外比较研究。","authors":"Saloni Vijaywargiya, Harshit Srivastava, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B Prasad, Prachi Mital, Avneet Kaur","doi":"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nAim: \nTo compare and evaluate the effect of glide path creation with Nitiflex hand K- file, Proglider and Path file on canal transportation and concentricity in apically curved canals. \nObjectives: \nTo compare the degree of canal transportation and concentricity between: \n1) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file vs Proglider file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \n2) Glide path preparation with Proglider file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \n3) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand- K file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \nMaterials and methods: \nForty ISO 20, 0.02 taper, Endo Training Blocks (Dentsply Maillefer) were acquired and divided into following four groups (n = 10): group A, Control group without glide path preparation; group B, Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file; Group C: Glide path preparation with Proglider file; Group D: Glide path preparation with Path files. In all the groups, combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation was done after glide path creation. Pre- and post-instrumentation digital images were processed with Image J Version 1.8.0 software to identify the center of the canal, and then superimposed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software. Unpaired/independent t test and One Way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison of difference of mean scores. \nResults: \nIn comparison to other groups, training blocks instrumented with Proglider files and a combination of Hyflex EDM and CM files had reduced deviation in canal axis. \nConclusion: \nFollowing the combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation with an earlier glide path created with Proglider file, canal concentricity and canal geometry are better preserved. \nKey words: Glide path, canal transportation, proglider, path files, Hyflex EDM","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of the effect of glide path creation with Nitiflex hand K- file, Proglider and Path file on canal transportation and concentricity in apically curved canals - An In- Vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Saloni Vijaywargiya, Harshit Srivastava, Deepak Raisingani, Ashwini B Prasad, Prachi Mital, Avneet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nAim: \\nTo compare and evaluate the effect of glide path creation with Nitiflex hand K- file, Proglider and Path file on canal transportation and concentricity in apically curved canals. \\nObjectives: \\nTo compare the degree of canal transportation and concentricity between: \\n1) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file vs Proglider file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \\n2) Glide path preparation with Proglider file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \\n3) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand- K file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation \\nMaterials and methods: \\nForty ISO 20, 0.02 taper, Endo Training Blocks (Dentsply Maillefer) were acquired and divided into following four groups (n = 10): group A, Control group without glide path preparation; group B, Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file; Group C: Glide path preparation with Proglider file; Group D: Glide path preparation with Path files. In all the groups, combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation was done after glide path creation. Pre- and post-instrumentation digital images were processed with Image J Version 1.8.0 software to identify the center of the canal, and then superimposed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software. Unpaired/independent t test and One Way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison of difference of mean scores. \\nResults: \\nIn comparison to other groups, training blocks instrumented with Proglider files and a combination of Hyflex EDM and CM files had reduced deviation in canal axis. \\nConclusion: \\nFollowing the combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation with an earlier glide path created with Proglider file, canal concentricity and canal geometry are better preserved. \\nKey words: Glide path, canal transportation, proglider, path files, Hyflex EDM\",\"PeriodicalId\":100856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:比较和评价Nitiflex手K锉、Proglider锉和path锉对根尖弯曲根管移动和同心度的影响。目的:比较以下地区的运河运输和同心度:1)使用Nitiflex hand-K文件制备滑翔路径vs Proglider文件,然后结合Hyflex EDM和CM文件仪器2)使用Proglider文件制备滑翔路径vs path文件,然后结合Hyflex EDM和CM文件仪器3)使用Nitiflex hand-K文件制备滑翔路径vs path文件,然后结合Hyflex EDM和CM文件仪器材料和方法:获取ISO 20, 0.02锥度,Endo训练块(Dentsply Maillefer) 40块,分为4组(n = 10): A组,对照组,不做滑翔路径准备;B组,用Nitiflex手k锉制备滑翔路径;C组:用Proglider文件准备滑翔路径;D组:用路径文件准备滑翔路径。在所有组中,在创建滑行路径后,Hyflex EDM和CM文件检测结合进行。使用Image J Version 1.8.0软件对测量前后的数字图像进行处理,确定根管中心,然后使用Adobe Photoshop 7.0软件进行叠加。组间比较采用非配对/独立t检验和单因素方差分析。结果:与其他组相比,使用Proglider锉和Hyflex EDM和CM锉组合的训练块减少了管轴偏移。结论:采用Hyflex EDM和CM文件联合使用Proglider文件创建早期滑动路径后,根管同心度和根管几何形状得到了更好的保留。关键词:滑翔机,航道运输,滑翔机,路径文件,Hyflex EDM
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of the effect of glide path creation with Nitiflex hand K- file, Proglider and Path file on canal transportation and concentricity in apically curved canals - An In- Vitro study.
Abstract Aim: To compare and evaluate the effect of glide path creation with Nitiflex hand K- file, Proglider and Path file on canal transportation and concentricity in apically curved canals. Objectives: To compare the degree of canal transportation and concentricity between: 1) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file vs Proglider file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation 2) Glide path preparation with Proglider file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation 3) Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand- K file vs Path file followed by combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation Materials and methods: Forty ISO 20, 0.02 taper, Endo Training Blocks (Dentsply Maillefer) were acquired and divided into following four groups (n = 10): group A, Control group without glide path preparation; group B, Glide path preparation with Nitiflex hand-K file; Group C: Glide path preparation with Proglider file; Group D: Glide path preparation with Path files. In all the groups, combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation was done after glide path creation. Pre- and post-instrumentation digital images were processed with Image J Version 1.8.0 software to identify the center of the canal, and then superimposed using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software. Unpaired/independent t test and One Way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison of difference of mean scores. Results: In comparison to other groups, training blocks instrumented with Proglider files and a combination of Hyflex EDM and CM files had reduced deviation in canal axis. Conclusion: Following the combination of Hyflex EDM and CM file instrumentation with an earlier glide path created with Proglider file, canal concentricity and canal geometry are better preserved. Key words: Glide path, canal transportation, proglider, path files, Hyflex EDM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信