国外多阶段分权的经验:对乌克兰的教训

Q4 Social Sciences
Maryna Мyhun
{"title":"国外多阶段分权的经验:对乌克兰的教训","authors":"Maryna Мyhun","doi":"10.32347/2786-7269.2022.2.216-228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the decentralization practices of foreign countries, their many years of experience in the system of reforming the state system. Given the similarity of many problems faced by the state authorities of France and Ukraine, as well as the presence of problems specific to our country, an extremely important task is the analysis of world experience in solving them. \nIt should be understood that the concept of «decentralization» covers not only the processes of administrative and territorial management, but also political, financial, economic, etc. Accordingly, our hypothesis was that decentralization is not limited to the reorganization of administrative and territorial management.  \nWhen choosing a country whose lessons for Ukraine we chose for analysis, preference was given to France, since this country has long been considered exemplary in terms of decentralization policy. In addition, it was important for us that Ukraine, when creating a model of public power in the regions, chose the French, or continental, model. The indicative continental model is useful for scientific purposes, as it contains the fundamental principles for the implementation of the reform. Decentralized management, initiated by France, became an example for Ukraine. \nThe article analyzes the peculiarities of the decentralization policy in France at several of its stages. The first was characterized by a course of delegation of powers in the field of management and socio-economic development of local self-government bodies, creation of elected bodies at the level of regions. At the same time, at the beginning of the XXI century. the state moves to the next stage, the focus of which is to strengthen the financial independence and potential of territorial communities, for which a number of powers were transferred to the latter. In the 2010s, the emphasis of regional policy shifted towards the stimulation of municipal cooperation and consolidation of regions. \nThe assessment of the multi-stage implementation of the decentralization policy in France makes it possible to claim that the administrative-territorial reform of 2020 did not exhaust the political aspects of decentralization in Ukraine, and to predict new stages of the implementation of the decentralization policy in Ukraine. ","PeriodicalId":39927,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Spatial Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EXPERIENCE OF MULTI-STAGE DECENTRALIZATION OF POWER IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE\",\"authors\":\"Maryna Мyhun\",\"doi\":\"10.32347/2786-7269.2022.2.216-228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the decentralization practices of foreign countries, their many years of experience in the system of reforming the state system. Given the similarity of many problems faced by the state authorities of France and Ukraine, as well as the presence of problems specific to our country, an extremely important task is the analysis of world experience in solving them. \\nIt should be understood that the concept of «decentralization» covers not only the processes of administrative and territorial management, but also political, financial, economic, etc. Accordingly, our hypothesis was that decentralization is not limited to the reorganization of administrative and territorial management.  \\nWhen choosing a country whose lessons for Ukraine we chose for analysis, preference was given to France, since this country has long been considered exemplary in terms of decentralization policy. In addition, it was important for us that Ukraine, when creating a model of public power in the regions, chose the French, or continental, model. The indicative continental model is useful for scientific purposes, as it contains the fundamental principles for the implementation of the reform. Decentralized management, initiated by France, became an example for Ukraine. \\nThe article analyzes the peculiarities of the decentralization policy in France at several of its stages. The first was characterized by a course of delegation of powers in the field of management and socio-economic development of local self-government bodies, creation of elected bodies at the level of regions. At the same time, at the beginning of the XXI century. the state moves to the next stage, the focus of which is to strengthen the financial independence and potential of territorial communities, for which a number of powers were transferred to the latter. In the 2010s, the emphasis of regional policy shifted towards the stimulation of municipal cooperation and consolidation of regions. \\nThe assessment of the multi-stage implementation of the decentralization policy in France makes it possible to claim that the administrative-territorial reform of 2020 did not exhaust the political aspects of decentralization in Ukraine, and to predict new stages of the implementation of the decentralization policy in Ukraine. \",\"PeriodicalId\":39927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Spatial Development\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Spatial Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2022.2.216-228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Spatial Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2022.2.216-228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要介绍了国外分权制的实践,以及他们多年来改革国家体制的经验。鉴于法国和乌克兰国家当局面临的许多问题的相似性,以及我国特有问题的存在,一项极其重要的任务是分析解决这些问题的世界经验。应该理解的是,“权力下放”的概念不仅包括行政和领土管理的过程,还包括政治、财政、经济等。因此,我们的假设是,权力下放并不局限于行政和领土管理的重组。在选择一个国家对乌克兰的教训进行分析时,我们优先考虑了法国,因为这个国家长期以来被认为是权力下放政策的典范。此外,对我们来说重要的是,乌克兰在该地区建立公共权力模式时,选择了法国或欧洲大陆模式。指示性大陆模式对科学目的是有用的,因为它包含了实施改革的基本原则。由法国发起的分散管理成为乌克兰的榜样。本文分析了法国分权政策在不同阶段的特点。第一个阶段的特点是在地方自治机构的管理和社会经济发展领域下放权力,在区域一级建立民选机构。与此同时,在二十一世纪初。国家进入下一阶段,其重点是加强领土社区的财政独立性和潜力,为此将一些权力移交给后者。在2010年代,区域政策的重点转向了促进城市合作和区域整合。通过对法国分权政策多阶段实施的评估,我们可以断言,2020年的行政-领土改革并没有穷尽乌克兰分权政策的政治方面,并预测乌克兰分权政策实施的新阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EXPERIENCE OF MULTI-STAGE DECENTRALIZATION OF POWER IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES: LESSONS FOR UKRAINE
The article is devoted to the decentralization practices of foreign countries, their many years of experience in the system of reforming the state system. Given the similarity of many problems faced by the state authorities of France and Ukraine, as well as the presence of problems specific to our country, an extremely important task is the analysis of world experience in solving them. It should be understood that the concept of «decentralization» covers not only the processes of administrative and territorial management, but also political, financial, economic, etc. Accordingly, our hypothesis was that decentralization is not limited to the reorganization of administrative and territorial management.  When choosing a country whose lessons for Ukraine we chose for analysis, preference was given to France, since this country has long been considered exemplary in terms of decentralization policy. In addition, it was important for us that Ukraine, when creating a model of public power in the regions, chose the French, or continental, model. The indicative continental model is useful for scientific purposes, as it contains the fundamental principles for the implementation of the reform. Decentralized management, initiated by France, became an example for Ukraine. The article analyzes the peculiarities of the decentralization policy in France at several of its stages. The first was characterized by a course of delegation of powers in the field of management and socio-economic development of local self-government bodies, creation of elected bodies at the level of regions. At the same time, at the beginning of the XXI century. the state moves to the next stage, the focus of which is to strengthen the financial independence and potential of territorial communities, for which a number of powers were transferred to the latter. In the 2010s, the emphasis of regional policy shifted towards the stimulation of municipal cooperation and consolidation of regions. The assessment of the multi-stage implementation of the decentralization policy in France makes it possible to claim that the administrative-territorial reform of 2020 did not exhaust the political aspects of decentralization in Ukraine, and to predict new stages of the implementation of the decentralization policy in Ukraine. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Spatial Development
European Journal of Spatial Development Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信