{"title":"纤维支气管镜下麻醉和重症监护呼吸机吸痰的分析","authors":"P. Kremeier","doi":"10.24966/ACC-8879/100032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this bench test was to compare the performance of an anesthesia and an intensive care ventilator during Fiber-optic Bronchoscopy (FOB) suctioning. Methods: In a lung model, a 5.9 mm OD FOB was inserted into an endotracheal tube through a tight-fitting connector. Pressure and flow sensors were placed at the airways opening (Pao) and distal to the bronchoscope at the trachea (Ptr). This model was tested under pressure and volume controlled mandatory ventilation and during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) delivered by both, anesthesia and intensive care ventilators. End-expiratory pressure was set at 10 cm H2O. Measurements were performed during suctioning with a mean negative flow of -12 ± 0.2 L/min at the tip of the FOB. Results: The anesthesia ventilator failed to keep end-expiratory pressure above zero at the trachea during FOB suctioning using both, continuous mandatory ventilation and CPAP. When using an intensive care ventilator, Ptr decreased below zero during FOB suctioning during volume controlled ventilation but remained slightly above zero under pressure controlled ventilation. When this ventilator delivered 10 cm H2O of CPAP, Pao remained constant while Ptr decreased by 2.5 cm H2O during suctioning. Conclusion: During FOB suctioning, targeted Ptr could neither be maintained anesthesia nor intensive care ventilators used in mandatory modes of ventilation. Only CPAP administered by the intensive care ventilator kept Ptr reasonably stable during suctioning.","PeriodicalId":73662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and intensive care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of an Anesthesia and Intensive Care Ventilators during Suctioning through a Fiber-optic Bronchoscope\",\"authors\":\"P. Kremeier\",\"doi\":\"10.24966/ACC-8879/100032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this bench test was to compare the performance of an anesthesia and an intensive care ventilator during Fiber-optic Bronchoscopy (FOB) suctioning. Methods: In a lung model, a 5.9 mm OD FOB was inserted into an endotracheal tube through a tight-fitting connector. Pressure and flow sensors were placed at the airways opening (Pao) and distal to the bronchoscope at the trachea (Ptr). This model was tested under pressure and volume controlled mandatory ventilation and during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) delivered by both, anesthesia and intensive care ventilators. End-expiratory pressure was set at 10 cm H2O. Measurements were performed during suctioning with a mean negative flow of -12 ± 0.2 L/min at the tip of the FOB. Results: The anesthesia ventilator failed to keep end-expiratory pressure above zero at the trachea during FOB suctioning using both, continuous mandatory ventilation and CPAP. When using an intensive care ventilator, Ptr decreased below zero during FOB suctioning during volume controlled ventilation but remained slightly above zero under pressure controlled ventilation. When this ventilator delivered 10 cm H2O of CPAP, Pao remained constant while Ptr decreased by 2.5 cm H2O during suctioning. Conclusion: During FOB suctioning, targeted Ptr could neither be maintained anesthesia nor intensive care ventilators used in mandatory modes of ventilation. Only CPAP administered by the intensive care ventilator kept Ptr reasonably stable during suctioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical anesthesia and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical anesthesia and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24966/ACC-8879/100032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical anesthesia and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/ACC-8879/100032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本台架试验的目的是比较麻醉和重症监护呼吸机在光纤支气管镜(FOB)吸入过程中的性能。方法:在肺模型中,将外径5.9 mm的FOB通过紧密接头插入气管内管。压力和流量传感器放置在气道开口(Pao)和气管支气管镜远端(Ptr)。该模型在压力和容量控制的强制通气和麻醉和重症监护呼吸机持续气道正压通气(CPAP)期间进行了测试。呼气末压设定为10 cm H2O。在抽吸过程中进行测量,平均负流量为-12±0.2 L/min。结果:在连续强制通气和CPAP两种方法下,麻醉呼吸机在FOB吸痰时均未能使气管呼气末压保持在零以上。当使用重症监护呼吸机时,在容积控制通气时,FOB吸痰时Ptr降至零以下,而在压力控制通气时,Ptr略高于零。当该呼吸机输送10 cm H2O的CPAP时,吸痰时Pao保持不变,而Ptr下降2.5 cm H2O。结论:在FOB吸痰过程中,靶向Ptr既不能维持麻醉,也不能使用强制通气模式下的重症监护呼吸机。只有重症监护呼吸机给予CPAP才能使吸入过程中Ptr保持合理稳定。
Analysis of an Anesthesia and Intensive Care Ventilators during Suctioning through a Fiber-optic Bronchoscope
Background: The aim of this bench test was to compare the performance of an anesthesia and an intensive care ventilator during Fiber-optic Bronchoscopy (FOB) suctioning. Methods: In a lung model, a 5.9 mm OD FOB was inserted into an endotracheal tube through a tight-fitting connector. Pressure and flow sensors were placed at the airways opening (Pao) and distal to the bronchoscope at the trachea (Ptr). This model was tested under pressure and volume controlled mandatory ventilation and during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) delivered by both, anesthesia and intensive care ventilators. End-expiratory pressure was set at 10 cm H2O. Measurements were performed during suctioning with a mean negative flow of -12 ± 0.2 L/min at the tip of the FOB. Results: The anesthesia ventilator failed to keep end-expiratory pressure above zero at the trachea during FOB suctioning using both, continuous mandatory ventilation and CPAP. When using an intensive care ventilator, Ptr decreased below zero during FOB suctioning during volume controlled ventilation but remained slightly above zero under pressure controlled ventilation. When this ventilator delivered 10 cm H2O of CPAP, Pao remained constant while Ptr decreased by 2.5 cm H2O during suctioning. Conclusion: During FOB suctioning, targeted Ptr could neither be maintained anesthesia nor intensive care ventilators used in mandatory modes of ventilation. Only CPAP administered by the intensive care ventilator kept Ptr reasonably stable during suctioning.