交叉组织和教育正义运动:跨运动团结的策略

M. Warren, A. King, Bianca Ortiz-Wythe, P. Belloy, J. Calderón, P. Martínez
{"title":"交叉组织和教育正义运动:跨运动团结的策略","authors":"M. Warren, A. King, Bianca Ortiz-Wythe, P. Belloy, J. Calderón, P. Martínez","doi":"10.33011/ASSEMBLY.V3I1.1015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores intersectional organizing as a strategy to create solidarity across issues, organizations and communities to build a more united educational justice movement. By intersectional organizing, we mean an organizing strategy that centers the experiences and leadership of people who are affected by multiple forms of oppression. We conducted interviews with ten community organizers who engage parents and young people of color to address the profound inequities in public education. We found that the movement is largely siloed into separate issue-based campaigns, although there are promising examples that connect groups and issues. Organizers believe that intersectional organizing can support greater cross-movement solidarity especially when combined with other processes, including building deep relationships, developing conscious leadership with shared understandings of systemic oppression through political education, and building trust through demonstrated long-term commitments to solidarity in practice. Nevertheless, many warn against an “Oppression Olympics” that creates competition rather than solidarity.","PeriodicalId":22413,"journal":{"name":"The EGU General Assembly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersectional Organizing and Educational Justice Movements: Strategies for Cross-Movement Solidarities\",\"authors\":\"M. Warren, A. King, Bianca Ortiz-Wythe, P. Belloy, J. Calderón, P. Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.33011/ASSEMBLY.V3I1.1015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores intersectional organizing as a strategy to create solidarity across issues, organizations and communities to build a more united educational justice movement. By intersectional organizing, we mean an organizing strategy that centers the experiences and leadership of people who are affected by multiple forms of oppression. We conducted interviews with ten community organizers who engage parents and young people of color to address the profound inequities in public education. We found that the movement is largely siloed into separate issue-based campaigns, although there are promising examples that connect groups and issues. Organizers believe that intersectional organizing can support greater cross-movement solidarity especially when combined with other processes, including building deep relationships, developing conscious leadership with shared understandings of systemic oppression through political education, and building trust through demonstrated long-term commitments to solidarity in practice. Nevertheless, many warn against an “Oppression Olympics” that creates competition rather than solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The EGU General Assembly\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The EGU General Assembly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33011/ASSEMBLY.V3I1.1015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EGU General Assembly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33011/ASSEMBLY.V3I1.1015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇文章探讨了交叉组织作为一种策略,在问题、组织和社区之间建立团结,以建立一个更加统一的教育正义运动。通过交叉组织,我们指的是一种组织策略,以受多种形式压迫影响的人们的经验和领导为中心。我们采访了10位社区组织者,他们与有色人种的父母和年轻人合作,解决公共教育中严重的不平等问题。我们发现,尽管有一些很有希望的例子将群体和问题联系起来,但这场运动在很大程度上是孤立的,是基于不同问题的运动。组织者认为,交叉组织可以支持更大的跨运动团结,特别是在与其他过程相结合的情况下,包括建立深厚的关系,通过政治教育培养对系统性压迫有共同理解的有意识的领导,以及通过在实践中表现出对团结的长期承诺来建立信任。然而,许多人警告说,“压迫奥运会”会制造竞争,而不是团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersectional Organizing and Educational Justice Movements: Strategies for Cross-Movement Solidarities
This article explores intersectional organizing as a strategy to create solidarity across issues, organizations and communities to build a more united educational justice movement. By intersectional organizing, we mean an organizing strategy that centers the experiences and leadership of people who are affected by multiple forms of oppression. We conducted interviews with ten community organizers who engage parents and young people of color to address the profound inequities in public education. We found that the movement is largely siloed into separate issue-based campaigns, although there are promising examples that connect groups and issues. Organizers believe that intersectional organizing can support greater cross-movement solidarity especially when combined with other processes, including building deep relationships, developing conscious leadership with shared understandings of systemic oppression through political education, and building trust through demonstrated long-term commitments to solidarity in practice. Nevertheless, many warn against an “Oppression Olympics” that creates competition rather than solidarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信