儿童和青少年腰椎滑脱的微创椎弓重建

А.R. Syundyukov, N. S. Nikolayev, V. Kuzmina, S. Aleksandrov, P.N. Kornyakov, V. Emelyanov
{"title":"儿童和青少年腰椎滑脱的微创椎弓重建","authors":"А.R. Syundyukov, N. S. Nikolayev, V. Kuzmina, S. Aleksandrov, P.N. Kornyakov, V. Emelyanov","doi":"10.17691/stm2021.13.5.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the minimally invasive technique used to reconstruct the vertebral arch with a pedicle screw hook system in grade I isthmic spondylolisthesis in comparison with the traditional technique of segment stabilization with interbody fusion. Materials and Methods The study included 26 patients aged from 11 to 17 years. The follow-up period lasted from 1 to 7 years. Two groups were formed: in group 1 (n=6), segments L5–S1 were stabilized using the traditional technique; in group 2 (n=20), the arch of the L5 vertebra was reconstructed by means of minimally invasive surgery. The pain syndrome was assessed in each study group using the visual analogue scale and Macnab criteria before and after surgery; blood loss, duration of surgery in minutes, and hospitalization in days were also measured. Results According to the Macnab scale, the two presented techniques did not show any statistically significant differences; however, when the arch synthesis technique was employed the spinal motion segment remained intact. Furthermore, in group 2, the volume of blood loss was smaller (44.0±19.6 compared to 300.0±130.4 ml, p<0.0001), the duration of the operation was 176.0±41.6 compared to 349.2±93.2 min, p<0.0001, and hospital stay was 6.9±1.6 compared to 10.0±2.1 days, p=0.0025 in the control group. Conclusion The technique of vertebral arch reconstruction by a minimally invasive access gives the possibility to stabilize the spinal motion segment and to preserve biomechanics and movements in the spine. This technique allows for shorter inpatient stays for patients as well as earlier recovery and rehabilitation due to reduced surgery time and blood loss.","PeriodicalId":18710,"journal":{"name":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","volume":"60 1","pages":"62 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Reconstruction of Vertebral Arch in Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents\",\"authors\":\"А.R. Syundyukov, N. S. Nikolayev, V. Kuzmina, S. Aleksandrov, P.N. Kornyakov, V. Emelyanov\",\"doi\":\"10.17691/stm2021.13.5.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the minimally invasive technique used to reconstruct the vertebral arch with a pedicle screw hook system in grade I isthmic spondylolisthesis in comparison with the traditional technique of segment stabilization with interbody fusion. Materials and Methods The study included 26 patients aged from 11 to 17 years. The follow-up period lasted from 1 to 7 years. Two groups were formed: in group 1 (n=6), segments L5–S1 were stabilized using the traditional technique; in group 2 (n=20), the arch of the L5 vertebra was reconstructed by means of minimally invasive surgery. The pain syndrome was assessed in each study group using the visual analogue scale and Macnab criteria before and after surgery; blood loss, duration of surgery in minutes, and hospitalization in days were also measured. Results According to the Macnab scale, the two presented techniques did not show any statistically significant differences; however, when the arch synthesis technique was employed the spinal motion segment remained intact. Furthermore, in group 2, the volume of blood loss was smaller (44.0±19.6 compared to 300.0±130.4 ml, p<0.0001), the duration of the operation was 176.0±41.6 compared to 349.2±93.2 min, p<0.0001, and hospital stay was 6.9±1.6 compared to 10.0±2.1 days, p=0.0025 in the control group. Conclusion The technique of vertebral arch reconstruction by a minimally invasive access gives the possibility to stabilize the spinal motion segment and to preserve biomechanics and movements in the spine. This technique allows for shorter inpatient stays for patients as well as earlier recovery and rehabilitation due to reduced surgery time and blood loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Technologies in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Technologies in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Technologies in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2021.13.5.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估微创技术用于I级峡部滑脱椎弓根螺钉钩系统重建椎弓的有效性,并与传统的椎体间融合节段稳定技术进行比较。材料与方法纳入患者26例,年龄11 ~ 17岁。随访1 ~ 7年。分为两组:第一组(n=6),采用传统技术稳定L5-S1节段;第二组(n=20)采用微创手术重建L5椎弓形。采用视觉模拟量表和Macnab标准对各研究组术前、术后疼痛综合征进行评估;出血量、手术时间(分钟)和住院时间(天)也被测量。结果根据Macnab量表,两种方法无统计学差异;然而,当采用弓合成技术时,脊柱运动节段保持完整。2组出血量更小(44.0±19.6 ml比300.0±130.4 ml, p<0.0001),手术时间176.0±41.6 min比349.2±93.2 min, p<0.0001,住院时间6.9±1.6 d比10.0±2.1 d, p=0.0025。结论微创入路椎弓重建技术可以稳定脊柱运动节段,保持脊柱的生物力学和运动特性。由于减少了手术时间和出血量,这种技术可以缩短患者的住院时间,并且可以更早地恢复和康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Reconstruction of Vertebral Arch in Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents
The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the minimally invasive technique used to reconstruct the vertebral arch with a pedicle screw hook system in grade I isthmic spondylolisthesis in comparison with the traditional technique of segment stabilization with interbody fusion. Materials and Methods The study included 26 patients aged from 11 to 17 years. The follow-up period lasted from 1 to 7 years. Two groups were formed: in group 1 (n=6), segments L5–S1 were stabilized using the traditional technique; in group 2 (n=20), the arch of the L5 vertebra was reconstructed by means of minimally invasive surgery. The pain syndrome was assessed in each study group using the visual analogue scale and Macnab criteria before and after surgery; blood loss, duration of surgery in minutes, and hospitalization in days were also measured. Results According to the Macnab scale, the two presented techniques did not show any statistically significant differences; however, when the arch synthesis technique was employed the spinal motion segment remained intact. Furthermore, in group 2, the volume of blood loss was smaller (44.0±19.6 compared to 300.0±130.4 ml, p<0.0001), the duration of the operation was 176.0±41.6 compared to 349.2±93.2 min, p<0.0001, and hospital stay was 6.9±1.6 compared to 10.0±2.1 days, p=0.0025 in the control group. Conclusion The technique of vertebral arch reconstruction by a minimally invasive access gives the possibility to stabilize the spinal motion segment and to preserve biomechanics and movements in the spine. This technique allows for shorter inpatient stays for patients as well as earlier recovery and rehabilitation due to reduced surgery time and blood loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信