《埃尔斯米尔·乔叟:过去与未来的坎特伯雷故事集

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
James Simpson
{"title":"《埃尔斯米尔·乔叟:过去与未来的坎特伯雷故事集","authors":"James Simpson","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2022.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay about the Huntington Library’s Ellesmere manuscript of Canterbury Tales was originally written to be a research lecture, one of a series of talks on treasures of the Huntington’s collections given in celebration of the Huntington’s centennial in 2019–20. Here, James Simpson uses the manuscript, and particularly its visual depiction of Chaucer as a storytelling pilgrim, as a lens for understanding the role of Chaucer in producing the Tales. He outlines the various ways in which scholarship has divagated from the evidence of this manuscript, yet returned to it. Simpson argues that we should return even more closely to it, admitting the likelihood that Chaucer himself oversaw its production.","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ellesmere Chaucer: The Once and Future Canterbury Tales\",\"authors\":\"James Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hlq.2022.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay about the Huntington Library’s Ellesmere manuscript of Canterbury Tales was originally written to be a research lecture, one of a series of talks on treasures of the Huntington’s collections given in celebration of the Huntington’s centennial in 2019–20. Here, James Simpson uses the manuscript, and particularly its visual depiction of Chaucer as a storytelling pilgrim, as a lens for understanding the role of Chaucer in producing the Tales. He outlines the various ways in which scholarship has divagated from the evidence of this manuscript, yet returned to it. Simpson argues that we should return even more closely to it, admitting the likelihood that Chaucer himself oversaw its production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2022.0014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2022.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇关于亨廷顿图书馆的《坎特伯雷故事集》埃尔斯米尔手稿的文章最初是作为一篇研究演讲而写的,这是为庆祝亨廷顿图书馆在2019 - 2020年成立100周年而举行的一系列关于亨廷顿收藏珍品的演讲之一。在这里,詹姆斯·辛普森(James Simpson)使用手稿,尤其是它对乔叟作为一个讲故事的朝圣者的视觉描绘,作为理解乔叟在创作《故事集》中所起作用的镜头。他概述了学术从手稿的证据中偏离,然后又回到手稿的各种方式。辛普森认为,我们应该更密切地关注它,并承认乔叟可能亲自监督了它的制作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ellesmere Chaucer: The Once and Future Canterbury Tales
abstract:This essay about the Huntington Library’s Ellesmere manuscript of Canterbury Tales was originally written to be a research lecture, one of a series of talks on treasures of the Huntington’s collections given in celebration of the Huntington’s centennial in 2019–20. Here, James Simpson uses the manuscript, and particularly its visual depiction of Chaucer as a storytelling pilgrim, as a lens for understanding the role of Chaucer in producing the Tales. He outlines the various ways in which scholarship has divagated from the evidence of this manuscript, yet returned to it. Simpson argues that we should return even more closely to it, admitting the likelihood that Chaucer himself oversaw its production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信