医学法律边栏:被别人的病人起诉——什么时候路边咨询会带来医学法律上的危险?

B. S. Bal, W. Teo, Lawrence H. Brenner
{"title":"医学法律边栏:被别人的病人起诉——什么时候路边咨询会带来医学法律上的危险?","authors":"B. S. Bal, W. Teo, Lawrence H. Brenner","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgeons know that staying current on surgical techniques is important; they may not realize that medicolegal principles evolve just as quickly. In 2018, it was reasonable to believe that one might be sued for malpractice by a patient; in 2019, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision found that a physician-patient relationship is not a necessary element in a medical malpractice claim [8]. In the ruling, the Court ruled that during the time that a physician acts in a professional capacity, if it is reasonably foreseeable that a third-party will rely on the physician’s medical decisionmaking that may ultimately harm the patient, then a physician duty of care toward that patient arises, even absent a physician-patient relationship [8]. Modern medical practice is increasingly democratized by team-based approaches to medical care, information disclosure and dissemination, and shared decision-making. But the Minnesota court ruling is a reminder that courts still hold a traditional view that the physician is ultimately responsible for the patient, even for medical advice and decisionmaking done without establishing a physician-patient relationship.","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicolegal Sidebar: Getting Sued By Someone Else's Patient-When Does a Curbside Consultation Carry Medicolegal Jeopardy?\",\"authors\":\"B. S. Bal, W. Teo, Lawrence H. Brenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surgeons know that staying current on surgical techniques is important; they may not realize that medicolegal principles evolve just as quickly. In 2018, it was reasonable to believe that one might be sued for malpractice by a patient; in 2019, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision found that a physician-patient relationship is not a necessary element in a medical malpractice claim [8]. In the ruling, the Court ruled that during the time that a physician acts in a professional capacity, if it is reasonably foreseeable that a third-party will rely on the physician’s medical decisionmaking that may ultimately harm the patient, then a physician duty of care toward that patient arises, even absent a physician-patient relationship [8]. Modern medical practice is increasingly democratized by team-based approaches to medical care, information disclosure and dissemination, and shared decision-making. But the Minnesota court ruling is a reminder that courts still hold a traditional view that the physician is ultimately responsible for the patient, even for medical advice and decisionmaking done without establishing a physician-patient relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

外科医生知道保持最新的手术技术是很重要的;他们可能没有意识到,医学法律原则的发展也同样迅速。在2018年,人们有理由相信,患者可能会因医疗事故而起诉;2019年,明尼苏达州最高法院的一项裁决发现,医患关系不是医疗事故索赔的必要因素[8]。在裁决中,法院裁定,在医生以专业身份行事期间,如果可以合理地预见到第三方将依赖医生的医疗决策,而这可能最终会伤害到患者,那么即使没有医患关系,医生对该患者也有护理义务[8]。现代医疗实践日益民主化的团队为基础的方法来医疗保健,信息披露和传播,共同决策。但明尼苏达州法院的裁决提醒人们,法院仍然持有一种传统观点,即医生对患者负有最终责任,即使是在没有建立医患关系的情况下提出的医疗建议和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicolegal Sidebar: Getting Sued By Someone Else's Patient-When Does a Curbside Consultation Carry Medicolegal Jeopardy?
Surgeons know that staying current on surgical techniques is important; they may not realize that medicolegal principles evolve just as quickly. In 2018, it was reasonable to believe that one might be sued for malpractice by a patient; in 2019, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision found that a physician-patient relationship is not a necessary element in a medical malpractice claim [8]. In the ruling, the Court ruled that during the time that a physician acts in a professional capacity, if it is reasonably foreseeable that a third-party will rely on the physician’s medical decisionmaking that may ultimately harm the patient, then a physician duty of care toward that patient arises, even absent a physician-patient relationship [8]. Modern medical practice is increasingly democratized by team-based approaches to medical care, information disclosure and dissemination, and shared decision-making. But the Minnesota court ruling is a reminder that courts still hold a traditional view that the physician is ultimately responsible for the patient, even for medical advice and decisionmaking done without establishing a physician-patient relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信