在21世纪教授凯恩斯

IF 1.7 4区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Journal of Economic Education Pub Date : 1999-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220489909596093

D. Colander

{"title":"在21世纪教授凯恩斯","authors":"D. Colander","doi":"10.1080/00220489909596093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A lot of discussion lately has been about how to present Keynesian economics in the principles course. Some new principles textbook authors treat Keynesian economics as an historical artifact, no longer relevant to current economic events.' Others, such as McConnell and Brue (1999), continue to make Keynesian economics the core of students' understanding of macro. I am firmly on the side of saving Keynesian economics, or at least something similar to what we now call Keynesian economics. I explain in this article what I mean by that, but first, I present the arguments that have been put forward for dumping Keynesian economics. Four reasons have been generally suggested.","PeriodicalId":51564,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"364-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Keynes in the 21st Century\",\"authors\":\"D. Colander\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220489909596093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A lot of discussion lately has been about how to present Keynesian economics in the principles course. Some new principles textbook authors treat Keynesian economics as an historical artifact, no longer relevant to current economic events.' Others, such as McConnell and Brue (1999), continue to make Keynesian economics the core of students' understanding of macro. I am firmly on the side of saving Keynesian economics, or at least something similar to what we now call Keynesian economics. I explain in this article what I mean by that, but first, I present the arguments that have been put forward for dumping Keynesian economics. Four reasons have been generally suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"364-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220489909596093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

最近很多讨论都是关于如何在原理课上呈现凯恩斯主义经济学。一些新原理教科书的作者将凯恩斯主义经济学视为一种历史产物，不再与当前的经济事件相关。其他人，如McConnell和Brue(1999)，继续将凯恩斯主义经济学作为学生理解宏观的核心。我坚定地支持拯救凯恩斯主义经济学，或者至少类似于我们现在所说的凯恩斯主义经济学。我在这篇文章中解释了我的意思，但首先，我提出了抛弃凯恩斯主义经济学的论点。人们普遍提出了四个原因。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Teaching Keynes in the 21st Century

A lot of discussion lately has been about how to present Keynesian economics in the principles course. Some new principles textbook authors treat Keynesian economics as an historical artifact, no longer relevant to current economic events.' Others, such as McConnell and Brue (1999), continue to make Keynesian economics the core of students' understanding of macro. I am firmly on the side of saving Keynesian economics, or at least something similar to what we now call Keynesian economics. I explain in this article what I mean by that, but first, I present the arguments that have been put forward for dumping Keynesian economics. Four reasons have been generally suggested.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Economic Education Multiple-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

11.10%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Economic Education offers original articles on teaching economics. In its pages, leading scholars evaluate innovations in teaching techniques, materials, and programs. Instructors of introductory through graduate level economics will find the journal an indispensable resource for content and pedagogy in a variety of media. The Journal of Economic Education is published quarterly in cooperation with the National Council on Economic Education and the Advisory Committee on Economic Education of the American Economic Association.