Josh Adams, Piper L. Roby, P. Sewell, Jeffrey Schwierjohann, Mark W. Gumbert, M. Brandenburg
{"title":"brandenbark™的成功,一种为印第安那蝙蝠(myotis sodalis)设计的人工栖息结构","authors":"Josh Adams, Piper L. Roby, P. Sewell, Jeffrey Schwierjohann, Mark W. Gumbert, M. Brandenburg","doi":"10.21000/JASMR15010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is a concern for development projects in nearly half of the United States. The species roosts and rears young under exfoliating bark of trees, which has put it at risk for incurring adverse impacts from most projects that require tree clearing throughout its summer range. Project proponents generally incorporate avoidance and minimization strategies into the planning process. These strategies, however, are not always compatible with project goals and objectives, and mitigation is often required to offset adverse impacts to the Indiana bat. BrandenBark™ is an artificial roost structure that mimics the natural roosting habitat of Indiana bats. To date, 69 BrandenBark™ structures have been installed in 7 states (IL, KY, LA, OH, PA, TN and WV). Of these, 59 (86%) structures have been used by 6 species of bats, including northern long-eared bats (proposed for federal listing) and little brown bats (under status review); however, the majority of use (85%) has been by maternity colonies of Indiana bats confirmed by radio telemetry, capture, or genetic analysis of guano. Of the structures used by Indiana bats at Fort Knox Military Installation (n=21) in north-central Kentucky, 120 emergence counts have been conducted with an average of 81.3±7.1 bats per roost. Although the","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUCCESS OF BRANDENBARK™, AN ARTIFICIAL ROOST STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR USE BY INDIANA BATS (MYOTIS SODALIS) 1\",\"authors\":\"Josh Adams, Piper L. Roby, P. Sewell, Jeffrey Schwierjohann, Mark W. Gumbert, M. Brandenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.21000/JASMR15010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is a concern for development projects in nearly half of the United States. The species roosts and rears young under exfoliating bark of trees, which has put it at risk for incurring adverse impacts from most projects that require tree clearing throughout its summer range. Project proponents generally incorporate avoidance and minimization strategies into the planning process. These strategies, however, are not always compatible with project goals and objectives, and mitigation is often required to offset adverse impacts to the Indiana bat. BrandenBark™ is an artificial roost structure that mimics the natural roosting habitat of Indiana bats. To date, 69 BrandenBark™ structures have been installed in 7 states (IL, KY, LA, OH, PA, TN and WV). Of these, 59 (86%) structures have been used by 6 species of bats, including northern long-eared bats (proposed for federal listing) and little brown bats (under status review); however, the majority of use (85%) has been by maternity colonies of Indiana bats confirmed by radio telemetry, capture, or genetic analysis of guano. Of the structures used by Indiana bats at Fort Knox Military Installation (n=21) in north-central Kentucky, 120 emergence counts have been conducted with an average of 81.3±7.1 bats per roost. Although the\",\"PeriodicalId\":17230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SUCCESS OF BRANDENBARK™, AN ARTIFICIAL ROOST STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR USE BY INDIANA BATS (MYOTIS SODALIS) 1
The federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is a concern for development projects in nearly half of the United States. The species roosts and rears young under exfoliating bark of trees, which has put it at risk for incurring adverse impacts from most projects that require tree clearing throughout its summer range. Project proponents generally incorporate avoidance and minimization strategies into the planning process. These strategies, however, are not always compatible with project goals and objectives, and mitigation is often required to offset adverse impacts to the Indiana bat. BrandenBark™ is an artificial roost structure that mimics the natural roosting habitat of Indiana bats. To date, 69 BrandenBark™ structures have been installed in 7 states (IL, KY, LA, OH, PA, TN and WV). Of these, 59 (86%) structures have been used by 6 species of bats, including northern long-eared bats (proposed for federal listing) and little brown bats (under status review); however, the majority of use (85%) has been by maternity colonies of Indiana bats confirmed by radio telemetry, capture, or genetic analysis of guano. Of the structures used by Indiana bats at Fort Knox Military Installation (n=21) in north-central Kentucky, 120 emergence counts have been conducted with an average of 81.3±7.1 bats per roost. Although the