“制裁对一些人来说是好事,但对像我这样真正在找工作的人来说却不是。英国求职者津贴申领人对惩罚性福利改革的看法:霸权在起作用?

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
D. Fletcher, James C. A. Redman
{"title":"“制裁对一些人来说是好事,但对像我这样真正在找工作的人来说却不是。英国求职者津贴申领人对惩罚性福利改革的看法:霸权在起作用?","authors":"D. Fletcher, James C. A. Redman","doi":"10.1177/03098168221109653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows that the unemployed are broadly supportive of welfare reforms which have led to increased poverty; exacerbated ill health; led some to engage in ‘survival crime’ or to disengage from the social security system. This support is predicated on the perceived need to discipline ‘undeserving’ groups; principally the feckless, those gaming the system and migrants. The authors argue that this reflects the success of a ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project that has sought to legitimise an ongoing phase of capitalist development characterised by the removal of social protections, widening inter-class inequalities and the implementation of punitive welfare reforms to submit the unemployed to insecure poverty labour. This article makes a significant original contribution to the field by demonstrating that the resonance of the ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project resides in both its relatability to lived experiences of the unemployed and its tendency to cast a stigmatising threat over their out-of-work status.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"459 1","pages":"429 - 449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘The sanctions are good for some people but not for someone like me who actually genuinely does their job search.’ British Jobseeker’s Allowance claimant views on punitive welfare reform: Hegemony in action?\",\"authors\":\"D. Fletcher, James C. A. Redman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03098168221109653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article shows that the unemployed are broadly supportive of welfare reforms which have led to increased poverty; exacerbated ill health; led some to engage in ‘survival crime’ or to disengage from the social security system. This support is predicated on the perceived need to discipline ‘undeserving’ groups; principally the feckless, those gaming the system and migrants. The authors argue that this reflects the success of a ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project that has sought to legitimise an ongoing phase of capitalist development characterised by the removal of social protections, widening inter-class inequalities and the implementation of punitive welfare reforms to submit the unemployed to insecure poverty labour. This article makes a significant original contribution to the field by demonstrating that the resonance of the ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project resides in both its relatability to lived experiences of the unemployed and its tendency to cast a stigmatising threat over their out-of-work status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capital and Class\",\"volume\":\"459 1\",\"pages\":\"429 - 449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capital and Class\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168221109653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital and Class","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168221109653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章表明,失业者普遍支持导致贫困加剧的福利改革;健康状况恶化;导致一些人从事“生存犯罪”或脱离社会保障制度。这种支持是基于对“不值得”的群体进行纪律约束的感知需求;主要是那些无能的人,那些玩弄制度和移民的人。作者认为,这反映了“两国”霸权计划的成功,该计划试图使资本主义发展的一个正在进行的阶段合法化,其特征是取消社会保护,扩大阶级间的不平等,实施惩罚性的福利改革,使失业者不得不从事不安全的贫困劳动。本文对这一领域做出了重要的原创性贡献,证明了“两国”霸权计划的共鸣既存在于它与失业者的生活经历的相关性,也存在于它对失业者的失业状况施加污名化威胁的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘The sanctions are good for some people but not for someone like me who actually genuinely does their job search.’ British Jobseeker’s Allowance claimant views on punitive welfare reform: Hegemony in action?
This article shows that the unemployed are broadly supportive of welfare reforms which have led to increased poverty; exacerbated ill health; led some to engage in ‘survival crime’ or to disengage from the social security system. This support is predicated on the perceived need to discipline ‘undeserving’ groups; principally the feckless, those gaming the system and migrants. The authors argue that this reflects the success of a ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project that has sought to legitimise an ongoing phase of capitalist development characterised by the removal of social protections, widening inter-class inequalities and the implementation of punitive welfare reforms to submit the unemployed to insecure poverty labour. This article makes a significant original contribution to the field by demonstrating that the resonance of the ‘two-nations’ hegemonic project resides in both its relatability to lived experiences of the unemployed and its tendency to cast a stigmatising threat over their out-of-work status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Capital and Class
Capital and Class POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信