边坡拐角稳定性:基于位移的有限元研究

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
A. Timchenko, J. Briaud
{"title":"边坡拐角稳定性:基于位移的有限元研究","authors":"A. Timchenko, J. Briaud","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2022-0495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stability of slopes is typically evaluated by two-dimensional plane strain analysis. However, many slopes exhibit three-dimensional geometries, including slope corners. Several researchers have studied the stability of slope corners but found that the factor of safety (FS) was close to the FS for the plane strain case. The results of a new series of 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating slope corners including slope angle, plan view angle, radius of curvature, and slope height are presented. They confirm that the FS does not vary much for corners compared to the plane strain case. However, 220 cases using an elastic-perfectly plastic soil model together with the FEM shear strength reduction method show that the displacement field is very different at the corners compared to plane strain with differences reaching over 100%. The displacement ratio between corners and plane strain is presented as a function of the plan view angle of the corner. Often failure is defined at a chosen large displacement, as in the ultimate load of foundation elements. If this concept is carried over to slope stability, it would indicate that the FS of corners should be very different from the plane strain case. A possible explanation is discussed.","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":"39 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STABILITY OF SLOPE CORNERS: A DISPLACEMENT BASED FEM STUDY\",\"authors\":\"A. Timchenko, J. Briaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cgj-2022-0495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stability of slopes is typically evaluated by two-dimensional plane strain analysis. However, many slopes exhibit three-dimensional geometries, including slope corners. Several researchers have studied the stability of slope corners but found that the factor of safety (FS) was close to the FS for the plane strain case. The results of a new series of 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating slope corners including slope angle, plan view angle, radius of curvature, and slope height are presented. They confirm that the FS does not vary much for corners compared to the plane strain case. However, 220 cases using an elastic-perfectly plastic soil model together with the FEM shear strength reduction method show that the displacement field is very different at the corners compared to plane strain with differences reaching over 100%. The displacement ratio between corners and plane strain is presented as a function of the plan view angle of the corner. Often failure is defined at a chosen large displacement, as in the ultimate load of foundation elements. If this concept is carried over to slope stability, it would indicate that the FS of corners should be very different from the plane strain case. A possible explanation is discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0495\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边坡的稳定性通常用二维平面应变分析来评价。然而,许多斜坡呈现三维几何形状,包括斜角。一些学者对边坡拐角的稳定性进行了研究,但发现在平面应变情况下,安全系数(FS)接近于安全系数。本文介绍了一种新的三维有限元法(FEM)对坡角的模拟结果,包括坡角、平面视角、曲率半径和坡高。他们证实,与平面应变情况相比,转角的FS变化不大。然而,采用完全弹塑性土模型和有限元抗剪强度折减法计算的220个实例表明,弯角处的位移场与平面应变差异很大,差异可达100%以上。角间位移比与平面应变的关系是角平面视角的函数。破坏通常定义在一个选定的大位移,如在基础单元的极限荷载。如果将这一概念推广到边坡稳定性,则表明转角的FS应该与平面应变情况大不相同。讨论了一种可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STABILITY OF SLOPE CORNERS: A DISPLACEMENT BASED FEM STUDY
The stability of slopes is typically evaluated by two-dimensional plane strain analysis. However, many slopes exhibit three-dimensional geometries, including slope corners. Several researchers have studied the stability of slope corners but found that the factor of safety (FS) was close to the FS for the plane strain case. The results of a new series of 3D Finite Element Method (FEM) simulating slope corners including slope angle, plan view angle, radius of curvature, and slope height are presented. They confirm that the FS does not vary much for corners compared to the plane strain case. However, 220 cases using an elastic-perfectly plastic soil model together with the FEM shear strength reduction method show that the displacement field is very different at the corners compared to plane strain with differences reaching over 100%. The displacement ratio between corners and plane strain is presented as a function of the plan view angle of the corner. Often failure is defined at a chosen large displacement, as in the ultimate load of foundation elements. If this concept is carried over to slope stability, it would indicate that the FS of corners should be very different from the plane strain case. A possible explanation is discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling. Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信