小儿强迫症的神经认知功能

Daniel A. Geller, A. Abramovitch, A. Mittelman, Abigail M. Stark, Kesley A. Ramsey, Allison W. Cooperman, L. Baer, S. E. Stewart
{"title":"小儿强迫症的神经认知功能","authors":"Daniel A. Geller, A. Abramovitch, A. Mittelman, Abigail M. Stark, Kesley A. Ramsey, Allison W. Cooperman, L. Baer, S. E. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2017.1282173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The small body of neuropsychological research in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) yields inconsistent results. A recent meta-analysis found small effect sizes, concluding that paediatric OCD may not be associated with cognitive impairments, stressing the need for more research. We investigated neuropsychological performance in a large sample of youths with OCD, while assessing potential moderators. Methods: Participants with OCD (n = 102) and matched controls (n = 161) were thoroughly screened and blindly evaluated for comorbidities, and completed a neuropsychological battery assessing processing speed, visuospatial abilities (VSA), working memory (WM), non-verbal memory (NVM), and executive functions (EF). Results: Compared to controls, youths with OCD exhibited underperformance on tasks assessing processing speed. On tests of VSA and WM, underperformance was found only on timed tasks. There were no differences on NVM and EF tasks. Notably, the OCD group’s standardised scores were in the normative range. Test performance was not associated with demographic or clinical variables. Conclusions: Youths with OCD exhibited intact performance on memory and EF tests, but slower processing speed, and underperformance only on timed VSA and WM tasks. While the OCD group performed in the normative range, these findings reveal relative weaknesses that may be overlooked. Such an oversight may be of particular importance in clinical and school settings.","PeriodicalId":22963,"journal":{"name":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":"409 1","pages":"142 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognitive function in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A. Geller, A. Abramovitch, A. Mittelman, Abigail M. Stark, Kesley A. Ramsey, Allison W. Cooperman, L. Baer, S. E. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15622975.2017.1282173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: The small body of neuropsychological research in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) yields inconsistent results. A recent meta-analysis found small effect sizes, concluding that paediatric OCD may not be associated with cognitive impairments, stressing the need for more research. We investigated neuropsychological performance in a large sample of youths with OCD, while assessing potential moderators. Methods: Participants with OCD (n = 102) and matched controls (n = 161) were thoroughly screened and blindly evaluated for comorbidities, and completed a neuropsychological battery assessing processing speed, visuospatial abilities (VSA), working memory (WM), non-verbal memory (NVM), and executive functions (EF). Results: Compared to controls, youths with OCD exhibited underperformance on tasks assessing processing speed. On tests of VSA and WM, underperformance was found only on timed tasks. There were no differences on NVM and EF tasks. Notably, the OCD group’s standardised scores were in the normative range. Test performance was not associated with demographic or clinical variables. Conclusions: Youths with OCD exhibited intact performance on memory and EF tests, but slower processing speed, and underperformance only on timed VSA and WM tasks. While the OCD group performed in the normative range, these findings reveal relative weaknesses that may be overlooked. Such an oversight may be of particular importance in clinical and school settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"409 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1282173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1282173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

摘要目的:儿童强迫症(OCD)的小体神经心理学研究得出了不一致的结果。最近的一项荟萃分析发现了较小的效应大小,结论是儿科强迫症可能与认知障碍无关,强调需要更多的研究。我们调查了大量患有强迫症的青少年的神经心理学表现,同时评估了潜在的调节因子。方法:对102名强迫症患者(n = 102)和161名对照组(n = 161)进行全面筛选和盲目评估共病,并完成神经心理测试,评估处理速度、视觉空间能力(VSA)、工作记忆(WM)、非言语记忆(NVM)和执行功能(EF)。结果:与对照组相比,强迫症青少年在评估处理速度的任务上表现不佳。在VSA和WM测试中,只有在定时任务中才发现表现不佳。在NVM和EF任务上没有差异。值得注意的是,强迫症组的标准化分数在标准范围内。测试表现与人口统计学或临床变量无关。结论:强迫症青少年在记忆和EF测试中表现良好,但处理速度较慢,仅在定时VSA和WM任务中表现不佳。虽然强迫症组的表现在标准范围内,但这些发现揭示了可能被忽视的相对弱点。这种监督在临床和学校环境中可能特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurocognitive function in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder
Abstract Objectives: The small body of neuropsychological research in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) yields inconsistent results. A recent meta-analysis found small effect sizes, concluding that paediatric OCD may not be associated with cognitive impairments, stressing the need for more research. We investigated neuropsychological performance in a large sample of youths with OCD, while assessing potential moderators. Methods: Participants with OCD (n = 102) and matched controls (n = 161) were thoroughly screened and blindly evaluated for comorbidities, and completed a neuropsychological battery assessing processing speed, visuospatial abilities (VSA), working memory (WM), non-verbal memory (NVM), and executive functions (EF). Results: Compared to controls, youths with OCD exhibited underperformance on tasks assessing processing speed. On tests of VSA and WM, underperformance was found only on timed tasks. There were no differences on NVM and EF tasks. Notably, the OCD group’s standardised scores were in the normative range. Test performance was not associated with demographic or clinical variables. Conclusions: Youths with OCD exhibited intact performance on memory and EF tests, but slower processing speed, and underperformance only on timed VSA and WM tasks. While the OCD group performed in the normative range, these findings reveal relative weaknesses that may be overlooked. Such an oversight may be of particular importance in clinical and school settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信