{"title":"可视化和改进散射网络","authors":"Fergal Cotter, N. Kingsbury","doi":"10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scattering Transforms (or ScatterNets) introduced by Mallat in [1] are a promising start into creating a well-defined feature extractor to use for pattern recognition and image classification tasks. They are of particular interest due to their architectural similarity to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), while requiring no parameter learning and still performing very well (particularly in constrained classification tasks). In this paper we visualize what the deeper layers of a ScatterNet are sensitive to using a ‘DeScatterNet’. We show that the higher orders of ScatterNets are sensitive to complex, edge-like patterns (checker-boards and rippled edges). These complex patterns may be useful for texture classification, but are quite dissimilar from the patterns visualized in second and third layers of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) — the current state of the art Image Classifiers. We propose that this may be the source of the current gaps in performance between ScatterNets and CNNs (83% vs 93% on CIFAR-10 for ScatterNet+SVM vs ResNet). We then use these visualization tools to propose possible enhancements to the ScatterNet design, which show they have the power to extract features more closely resembling CNNs, while still being well-defined and having the invariance properties fundamental to ScatterNets.","PeriodicalId":6542,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)","volume":"59 4 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing and improving scattering networks\",\"authors\":\"Fergal Cotter, N. Kingsbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scattering Transforms (or ScatterNets) introduced by Mallat in [1] are a promising start into creating a well-defined feature extractor to use for pattern recognition and image classification tasks. They are of particular interest due to their architectural similarity to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), while requiring no parameter learning and still performing very well (particularly in constrained classification tasks). In this paper we visualize what the deeper layers of a ScatterNet are sensitive to using a ‘DeScatterNet’. We show that the higher orders of ScatterNets are sensitive to complex, edge-like patterns (checker-boards and rippled edges). These complex patterns may be useful for texture classification, but are quite dissimilar from the patterns visualized in second and third layers of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) — the current state of the art Image Classifiers. We propose that this may be the source of the current gaps in performance between ScatterNets and CNNs (83% vs 93% on CIFAR-10 for ScatterNet+SVM vs ResNet). We then use these visualization tools to propose possible enhancements to the ScatterNet design, which show they have the power to extract features more closely resembling CNNs, while still being well-defined and having the invariance properties fundamental to ScatterNets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)\",\"volume\":\"59 4 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 27th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MLSP.2017.8168136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
Mallat在[1]中引入的散射变换(或ScatterNets)是创建一个定义良好的特征提取器以用于模式识别和图像分类任务的一个有希望的开始。由于它们与卷积神经网络(cnn)的架构相似,它们特别令人感兴趣,同时不需要参数学习并且仍然表现非常好(特别是在约束分类任务中)。在本文中,我们可视化了使用“散点网”时散点网的较深层对什么敏感。我们表明,高阶的ScatterNets对复杂的边缘模式(棋盘和波纹边缘)很敏感。这些复杂的模式可能对纹理分类有用,但与卷积神经网络(cnn)的第二层和第三层可视化的模式非常不同——卷积神经网络是目前最先进的图像分类器。我们认为这可能是目前ScatterNet和cnn之间性能差距的来源(在CIFAR-10上,ScatterNet+SVM与ResNet的性能差距为83% vs 93%)。然后,我们使用这些可视化工具对ScatterNet设计提出可能的增强,这表明它们具有提取更接近cnn的特征的能力,同时仍然定义良好并具有ScatterNets的基本不变性。
Scattering Transforms (or ScatterNets) introduced by Mallat in [1] are a promising start into creating a well-defined feature extractor to use for pattern recognition and image classification tasks. They are of particular interest due to their architectural similarity to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), while requiring no parameter learning and still performing very well (particularly in constrained classification tasks). In this paper we visualize what the deeper layers of a ScatterNet are sensitive to using a ‘DeScatterNet’. We show that the higher orders of ScatterNets are sensitive to complex, edge-like patterns (checker-boards and rippled edges). These complex patterns may be useful for texture classification, but are quite dissimilar from the patterns visualized in second and third layers of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) — the current state of the art Image Classifiers. We propose that this may be the source of the current gaps in performance between ScatterNets and CNNs (83% vs 93% on CIFAR-10 for ScatterNet+SVM vs ResNet). We then use these visualization tools to propose possible enhancements to the ScatterNet design, which show they have the power to extract features more closely resembling CNNs, while still being well-defined and having the invariance properties fundamental to ScatterNets.