在澳大利亚潮湿的热带地区,农药通过甘蔗下的渗透带运输

4区 农林科学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rezaul Karim, L. Reading, L. Dawes, O. Dahan, Glynis Orr
{"title":"在澳大利亚潮湿的热带地区,农药通过甘蔗下的渗透带运输","authors":"Rezaul Karim, L. Reading, L. Dawes, O. Dahan, Glynis Orr","doi":"10.5194/soil-9-381-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Photosystem II (PS II) pesticides, recognized as a threat\nto ecological health, were targeted for reduction in sugarcane farming in\nGreat Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments. Alternative herbicides, the non-PS\nII herbicides (including glyphosate, paraquat, 2,4-D, imazapic,\nisoxaflutole, metolachlor, and S-metolachlor), continue to be used in these\ncatchments. However, the potential ecological fate, transport, and off-site\nenvironmental effects of non-PS II herbicides, with respect to their usage\nscheme, local rainfall patterns, and infiltration dynamics, have not been\ninvestigated previously. A vadose zone monitoring system, instrumented\nbeneath sugarcane land in a GBR catchment, was applied for real-time\ntracing of pesticide migration across the unsaturated zone, past the root\nzone during 2017–2019. The regularly applied pesticides (fluroxypyr and\nisoxaflutole) exhibited substantial migration through the unsaturated zone.\nWithin 1 month of application of fluroxypyr, it leached to 2.87 m depth\nin the vadose zone, with declining concentrations with depth. Isoxaflutole,\nwhich was applied yearly, was found only once, in November 2018, at 3.28 m depth in the soil profile. Other pesticides (imazapic, metolachlor,\nglyphosate, and haloxyfop) applied during the same period were not detected\nin the vadose zone. However, imidacloprid, which was not applied at the\nsite during the monitored period, was detected across the entire vadose\nzone, revealing substantial resistance to degradation. The results show no\nevidence of any regularly applied pesticides in the site bores at the end of\nthe study, indicating their ultimate degradation within the vadose zone\nbefore reaching the groundwater.\n","PeriodicalId":22015,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pesticide transport through the vadose zone under sugarcane in the Wet Tropics, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Rezaul Karim, L. Reading, L. Dawes, O. Dahan, Glynis Orr\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/soil-9-381-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Photosystem II (PS II) pesticides, recognized as a threat\\nto ecological health, were targeted for reduction in sugarcane farming in\\nGreat Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments. Alternative herbicides, the non-PS\\nII herbicides (including glyphosate, paraquat, 2,4-D, imazapic,\\nisoxaflutole, metolachlor, and S-metolachlor), continue to be used in these\\ncatchments. However, the potential ecological fate, transport, and off-site\\nenvironmental effects of non-PS II herbicides, with respect to their usage\\nscheme, local rainfall patterns, and infiltration dynamics, have not been\\ninvestigated previously. A vadose zone monitoring system, instrumented\\nbeneath sugarcane land in a GBR catchment, was applied for real-time\\ntracing of pesticide migration across the unsaturated zone, past the root\\nzone during 2017–2019. The regularly applied pesticides (fluroxypyr and\\nisoxaflutole) exhibited substantial migration through the unsaturated zone.\\nWithin 1 month of application of fluroxypyr, it leached to 2.87 m depth\\nin the vadose zone, with declining concentrations with depth. Isoxaflutole,\\nwhich was applied yearly, was found only once, in November 2018, at 3.28 m depth in the soil profile. Other pesticides (imazapic, metolachlor,\\nglyphosate, and haloxyfop) applied during the same period were not detected\\nin the vadose zone. However, imidacloprid, which was not applied at the\\nsite during the monitored period, was detected across the entire vadose\\nzone, revealing substantial resistance to degradation. The results show no\\nevidence of any regularly applied pesticides in the site bores at the end of\\nthe study, indicating their ultimate degradation within the vadose zone\\nbefore reaching the groundwater.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":22015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-381-2023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-381-2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要光系统II (PS II)农药被认为是对生态健康的威胁,是大堡礁(GBR)流域甘蔗种植减少的目标。替代除草剂,非psii除草剂(包括草甘膦、百草枯、2,4- d、异马唑、异草柳酮、异甲草胺和s -异甲草胺)继续在这些流域中使用。然而,非ps II除草剂在使用方案、当地降雨模式和入渗动态方面的潜在生态命运、运输和场外环境影响尚未得到研究。2017-2019年,在GBR集水区甘蔗地地下安装了一个渗透区监测系统,用于实时追踪农药在不饱和区越过根区的迁移。常用农药氟嘧菌酯和二恶氟唑通过不饱和区迁移。氟氧吡啶在施用1个月内,渗透深度达到2.87 m,浓度随深度下降。每年使用的异草氟唑仅在2018年11月在土壤剖面的3.28 m深度被发现一次。同期施用的其他农药(异马唑、异甲草胺、草甘膦和氟草磷)未在渗透区检测到。然而,在监测期间没有在现场施用吡虫啉的情况下,在整个vadosezone中都检测到吡虫啉,显示出对降解的显著抵抗。结果显示,在研究结束时,没有任何证据表明在现场钻孔中有任何定期施用农药,这表明它们在到达地下水之前在渗透区内最终降解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pesticide transport through the vadose zone under sugarcane in the Wet Tropics, Australia
Abstract. Photosystem II (PS II) pesticides, recognized as a threat to ecological health, were targeted for reduction in sugarcane farming in Great Barrier Reef (GBR) catchments. Alternative herbicides, the non-PS II herbicides (including glyphosate, paraquat, 2,4-D, imazapic, isoxaflutole, metolachlor, and S-metolachlor), continue to be used in these catchments. However, the potential ecological fate, transport, and off-site environmental effects of non-PS II herbicides, with respect to their usage scheme, local rainfall patterns, and infiltration dynamics, have not been investigated previously. A vadose zone monitoring system, instrumented beneath sugarcane land in a GBR catchment, was applied for real-time tracing of pesticide migration across the unsaturated zone, past the root zone during 2017–2019. The regularly applied pesticides (fluroxypyr and isoxaflutole) exhibited substantial migration through the unsaturated zone. Within 1 month of application of fluroxypyr, it leached to 2.87 m depth in the vadose zone, with declining concentrations with depth. Isoxaflutole, which was applied yearly, was found only once, in November 2018, at 3.28 m depth in the soil profile. Other pesticides (imazapic, metolachlor, glyphosate, and haloxyfop) applied during the same period were not detected in the vadose zone. However, imidacloprid, which was not applied at the site during the monitored period, was detected across the entire vadose zone, revealing substantial resistance to degradation. The results show no evidence of any regularly applied pesticides in the site bores at the end of the study, indicating their ultimate degradation within the vadose zone before reaching the groundwater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Science
Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Cessation.Soil Science satisfies the professional needs of all scientists and laboratory personnel involved in soil and plant research by publishing primary research reports and critical reviews of basic and applied soil science, especially as it relates to soil and plant studies and general environmental soil science. Each month, Soil Science presents authoritative research articles from an impressive array of discipline: soil chemistry and biochemistry, physics, fertility and nutrition, soil genesis and morphology, soil microbiology and mineralogy. Of immediate relevance to soil scientists-both industrial and academic-this unique publication also has long-range value for agronomists and environmental scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信