感知柔软的许多维度:探索过程如何受到材料和感知任务的影响*

Müge Cavdan, K. Doerschner, K. Drewing
{"title":"感知柔软的许多维度:探索过程如何受到材料和感知任务的影响*","authors":"Müge Cavdan, K. Doerschner, K. Drewing","doi":"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haptic research has traditionally often equated softness with compliance. However, in a recent study we have suggested that compliance is not the only perceived object dimension underlying what is commonly called softness [1]. Here, we investigate how the different perceptual dimensions of softness affect how materials are haptically explored. Participants freely explored and rated 19 materials on 15 adjectives. The adjectives defined different perceptual tasks by being associated with different softness dimensions. Materials were chosen to represent extreme values separately for each dimension; some materials served as control. Hand movements were recorded on video and subsequently categorized into different exploratory procedures (EPs). A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) yielded significant effects of material, of the perceptual task and of their interaction. Taken together, the results suggest that participants actively adapt their EPs to both the type of material being explored, and to the judged softness dimension, and thus support the notion of different dimensions of softness.","PeriodicalId":6702,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","volume":"57 1","pages":"437-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The many dimensions underlying perceived softness: How exploratory procedures are influenced by material and the perceptual task*\",\"authors\":\"Müge Cavdan, K. Doerschner, K. Drewing\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WHC.2019.8816088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Haptic research has traditionally often equated softness with compliance. However, in a recent study we have suggested that compliance is not the only perceived object dimension underlying what is commonly called softness [1]. Here, we investigate how the different perceptual dimensions of softness affect how materials are haptically explored. Participants freely explored and rated 19 materials on 15 adjectives. The adjectives defined different perceptual tasks by being associated with different softness dimensions. Materials were chosen to represent extreme values separately for each dimension; some materials served as control. Hand movements were recorded on video and subsequently categorized into different exploratory procedures (EPs). A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) yielded significant effects of material, of the perceptual task and of their interaction. Taken together, the results suggest that participants actively adapt their EPs to both the type of material being explored, and to the judged softness dimension, and thus support the notion of different dimensions of softness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"437-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2019.8816088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

触觉研究传统上经常将柔软与顺应性等同起来。然而,在最近的一项研究中,我们认为顺应性并不是通常所说的柔软性的唯一感知对象维度[1]。在这里,我们研究了柔软度的不同感知维度如何影响材料的触觉探索。参与者自由地探索和评价19个材料中的15个形容词。这些形容词通过关联不同的柔软度维度来定义不同的感知任务。选择材料分别代表每个维度的极值;一些材料作为对照。手的运动被记录在视频中,随后被分类为不同的探索程序(EPs)。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)显示了材料、感知任务及其相互作用的显著影响。综上所述,结果表明参与者积极地调整他们的EPs以适应正在探索的材料类型和判断的柔软度维度,从而支持不同柔软度维度的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The many dimensions underlying perceived softness: How exploratory procedures are influenced by material and the perceptual task*
Haptic research has traditionally often equated softness with compliance. However, in a recent study we have suggested that compliance is not the only perceived object dimension underlying what is commonly called softness [1]. Here, we investigate how the different perceptual dimensions of softness affect how materials are haptically explored. Participants freely explored and rated 19 materials on 15 adjectives. The adjectives defined different perceptual tasks by being associated with different softness dimensions. Materials were chosen to represent extreme values separately for each dimension; some materials served as control. Hand movements were recorded on video and subsequently categorized into different exploratory procedures (EPs). A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) yielded significant effects of material, of the perceptual task and of their interaction. Taken together, the results suggest that participants actively adapt their EPs to both the type of material being explored, and to the judged softness dimension, and thus support the notion of different dimensions of softness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信