北印度一家三级保健医院临床样本中金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的流行率和抗生素耐药模式

S. Tyagi, A. Oberoi
{"title":"北印度一家三级保健医院临床样本中金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的流行率和抗生素耐药模式","authors":"S. Tyagi, A. Oberoi","doi":"10.18311/IJMDS/2021/25742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a well recognized nosocomial and community acquired pathogen which is implicated in causing a wide spectrum of superficial, deep pyogenic infections and toxin mediated illnesses. Localized infections sometimes progress to systemic infections, while ‘spontaneous’ bacteraemia also occur without an evident septic focus, particularly in chronic debilitated immunocompromised patients. Emergence of drug resistance to penicillins and penicillinase-resistant penicillins (i.e., oxacillin and methicillin) is a globally recognized problem. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates are also important with respect to the range of nosocomial infections it causes, leading to an increase in the hospital expenditure and mortality or morbidity rate. The increased prevalence of such resistant strains has narrowed down the list of available therapeutic options. Therefore, information regarding the prevalence of S. aureus infections in a health care setting and determining its current antibiotic resistance profile becomes crucial in selecting appropriate treatment regime. Therefore, the current study was done in the department of Microbiology to determine the prevalence of S. aureus infections and the antibiotic resistance pattern of S. aureus isolates from various clinical specimens at our tertiary care hospital in North India. Materials and Methods: A one year prospective study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, at a tertiary care hospital in North India where non-duplicate strains of S. aureus isolated from various clinical specimens received in the Microbiology laboratory were studied. All S. aureus isolates were subjected to Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing using Kirby Bauer’s disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar plates in accordance to CLSI guidelines. The antibiotics tested included Penicillin (10U), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10μg), Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25/23.75μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Erythromycin (15μg), Clindamycin (2μg), Vancomycin (30μg), Teicoplanin (30μg) and Linezolid (30μg). Results: A total of 23,699 clinical specimens were processed in the laboratory while conducting this study, from which 1233 clinical isolates of S. aureus were identified and processed further. Among all clinical specimens, pyogenic samples (63.1%) yielded maximum number of S. aureus strains followed by blood samples (29.9%) and urine samples (4.8%). S. aureus infection was more evident in hospitalized 71.2% patients than in OPD patients 28.8%. Seasonal variation was also seen in isolation of S. aureus , with a higher percentage of isolates obtained during summer season than during winter season. On antibiotic susceptibility testing, 49.6% strains were Methicillin Resistant. Majority of the isolates were found resistant to Penicillin (92.1%), followed by Erythromycin (59%). Almost half of the total isolates were resistant to Sulphamethoxazole-Trimethoprim (49.3%) followed by Amoxicillin- Clavulanic acid (47.8%), Ciprofloxacin (43.4%) and Clindamycin (18.4%). Antibiotics to which all isolates showed 100% susceptibility included Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid. Conclusion: Given the high prevalence of resistance to antibiotics seen in this study, effective treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant Staphylococcal strains may become challenging. Drugs like Vancomycin, Teicoplanin and Linezolid promise to work as miracle drugs against the multidrug resistant MRSA strains but we need to warrant judicious use of these wonder drugs to conserve them for future use.","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"1919-1924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Clinical samples at a Tertiary Care Hospital, North India\",\"authors\":\"S. Tyagi, A. Oberoi\",\"doi\":\"10.18311/IJMDS/2021/25742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a well recognized nosocomial and community acquired pathogen which is implicated in causing a wide spectrum of superficial, deep pyogenic infections and toxin mediated illnesses. Localized infections sometimes progress to systemic infections, while ‘spontaneous’ bacteraemia also occur without an evident septic focus, particularly in chronic debilitated immunocompromised patients. Emergence of drug resistance to penicillins and penicillinase-resistant penicillins (i.e., oxacillin and methicillin) is a globally recognized problem. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates are also important with respect to the range of nosocomial infections it causes, leading to an increase in the hospital expenditure and mortality or morbidity rate. The increased prevalence of such resistant strains has narrowed down the list of available therapeutic options. Therefore, information regarding the prevalence of S. aureus infections in a health care setting and determining its current antibiotic resistance profile becomes crucial in selecting appropriate treatment regime. Therefore, the current study was done in the department of Microbiology to determine the prevalence of S. aureus infections and the antibiotic resistance pattern of S. aureus isolates from various clinical specimens at our tertiary care hospital in North India. Materials and Methods: A one year prospective study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, at a tertiary care hospital in North India where non-duplicate strains of S. aureus isolated from various clinical specimens received in the Microbiology laboratory were studied. All S. aureus isolates were subjected to Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing using Kirby Bauer’s disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar plates in accordance to CLSI guidelines. The antibiotics tested included Penicillin (10U), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10μg), Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25/23.75μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Erythromycin (15μg), Clindamycin (2μg), Vancomycin (30μg), Teicoplanin (30μg) and Linezolid (30μg). Results: A total of 23,699 clinical specimens were processed in the laboratory while conducting this study, from which 1233 clinical isolates of S. aureus were identified and processed further. Among all clinical specimens, pyogenic samples (63.1%) yielded maximum number of S. aureus strains followed by blood samples (29.9%) and urine samples (4.8%). S. aureus infection was more evident in hospitalized 71.2% patients than in OPD patients 28.8%. Seasonal variation was also seen in isolation of S. aureus , with a higher percentage of isolates obtained during summer season than during winter season. On antibiotic susceptibility testing, 49.6% strains were Methicillin Resistant. Majority of the isolates were found resistant to Penicillin (92.1%), followed by Erythromycin (59%). Almost half of the total isolates were resistant to Sulphamethoxazole-Trimethoprim (49.3%) followed by Amoxicillin- Clavulanic acid (47.8%), Ciprofloxacin (43.4%) and Clindamycin (18.4%). Antibiotics to which all isolates showed 100% susceptibility included Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid. Conclusion: Given the high prevalence of resistance to antibiotics seen in this study, effective treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant Staphylococcal strains may become challenging. Drugs like Vancomycin, Teicoplanin and Linezolid promise to work as miracle drugs against the multidrug resistant MRSA strains but we need to warrant judicious use of these wonder drugs to conserve them for future use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1919-1924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2021/25742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2021/25742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:金黄色葡萄球菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)是一种公认的医院和社区获得性病原体,它涉及引起广泛的浅表、深部化脓性感染和毒素介导的疾病。局部感染有时会发展为全身性感染,而“自发性”菌血症也会发生,但没有明显的败血症灶,特别是在慢性衰弱免疫功能低下的患者中。出现对青霉素类和耐青霉素酶青霉素类(即恶西林和甲氧西林)的耐药性是一个全球公认的问题。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株在其引起的院内感染范围方面也很重要,导致医院支出和死亡率或发病率增加。这种耐药菌株的日益流行缩小了可用治疗方案的范围。因此,医疗机构中有关金黄色葡萄球菌感染流行情况的信息,以及确定其当前抗生素耐药概况,对于选择适当的治疗方案至关重要。因此,本研究在印度北部三级医院的微生物科进行,以确定金黄色葡萄球菌感染的流行情况和从各种临床标本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌的抗生素耐药模式。材料和方法:一项为期一年的前瞻性研究在印度北部一家三级医院的微生物科进行,研究了从微生物实验室收到的各种临床标本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌的非重复菌株。所有金黄色葡萄球菌分离株均按照CLSI指南采用Kirby Bauer圆盘扩散法在Mueller Hinton琼脂板上进行抗生素药敏试验。检测的抗生素包括青霉素(10U)、阿莫西林-克拉维酸(20/10μg)、磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶(1.25/23.75μg)、环丙沙星(5μg)、红霉素(15μg)、克林霉素(2μg)、万古霉素(30μg)、替柯planin (30μg)和利奈唑胺(30μg)。结果:本研究共处理临床标本23699份,其中鉴定出临床分离金黄色葡萄球菌1233株并进一步处理。临床标本中金黄色葡萄球菌检出最多的是化脓性标本(63.1%),其次是血液标本(29.9%)和尿液标本(4.8%)。住院患者中金黄色葡萄球菌感染的发生率为71.2%,高于门诊患者的28.8%。金黄色葡萄球菌的分离也存在季节变化,夏季获得的分离株百分比高于冬季。药敏试验中,49.6%的菌株耐甲氧西林。大多数菌株对青霉素(92.1%)耐药,其次是红霉素(59%)。对磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶耐药的占比接近一半(49.3%),其次是阿莫西林-克拉维酸(47.8%)、环丙沙星(43.4%)和克林霉素(18.4%)。所有菌株对万古霉素、替柯planin、利奈唑胺等抗生素均100%敏感。结论:鉴于本研究中抗生素耐药性的高流行率,有效治疗由多重耐药葡萄球菌菌株引起的感染可能变得具有挑战性。万古霉素、替柯普兰和利奈唑胺等药物有望成为对抗耐多药MRSA菌株的特效药,但我们需要保证明智地使用这些特效药,以保存它们以备将来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Clinical samples at a Tertiary Care Hospital, North India
Background: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a well recognized nosocomial and community acquired pathogen which is implicated in causing a wide spectrum of superficial, deep pyogenic infections and toxin mediated illnesses. Localized infections sometimes progress to systemic infections, while ‘spontaneous’ bacteraemia also occur without an evident septic focus, particularly in chronic debilitated immunocompromised patients. Emergence of drug resistance to penicillins and penicillinase-resistant penicillins (i.e., oxacillin and methicillin) is a globally recognized problem. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates are also important with respect to the range of nosocomial infections it causes, leading to an increase in the hospital expenditure and mortality or morbidity rate. The increased prevalence of such resistant strains has narrowed down the list of available therapeutic options. Therefore, information regarding the prevalence of S. aureus infections in a health care setting and determining its current antibiotic resistance profile becomes crucial in selecting appropriate treatment regime. Therefore, the current study was done in the department of Microbiology to determine the prevalence of S. aureus infections and the antibiotic resistance pattern of S. aureus isolates from various clinical specimens at our tertiary care hospital in North India. Materials and Methods: A one year prospective study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, at a tertiary care hospital in North India where non-duplicate strains of S. aureus isolated from various clinical specimens received in the Microbiology laboratory were studied. All S. aureus isolates were subjected to Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing using Kirby Bauer’s disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar plates in accordance to CLSI guidelines. The antibiotics tested included Penicillin (10U), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20/10μg), Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25/23.75μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Erythromycin (15μg), Clindamycin (2μg), Vancomycin (30μg), Teicoplanin (30μg) and Linezolid (30μg). Results: A total of 23,699 clinical specimens were processed in the laboratory while conducting this study, from which 1233 clinical isolates of S. aureus were identified and processed further. Among all clinical specimens, pyogenic samples (63.1%) yielded maximum number of S. aureus strains followed by blood samples (29.9%) and urine samples (4.8%). S. aureus infection was more evident in hospitalized 71.2% patients than in OPD patients 28.8%. Seasonal variation was also seen in isolation of S. aureus , with a higher percentage of isolates obtained during summer season than during winter season. On antibiotic susceptibility testing, 49.6% strains were Methicillin Resistant. Majority of the isolates were found resistant to Penicillin (92.1%), followed by Erythromycin (59%). Almost half of the total isolates were resistant to Sulphamethoxazole-Trimethoprim (49.3%) followed by Amoxicillin- Clavulanic acid (47.8%), Ciprofloxacin (43.4%) and Clindamycin (18.4%). Antibiotics to which all isolates showed 100% susceptibility included Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid. Conclusion: Given the high prevalence of resistance to antibiotics seen in this study, effective treatment of infections caused by multidrug resistant Staphylococcal strains may become challenging. Drugs like Vancomycin, Teicoplanin and Linezolid promise to work as miracle drugs against the multidrug resistant MRSA strains but we need to warrant judicious use of these wonder drugs to conserve them for future use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信