{"title":"让我们开始数字化吧","authors":"K. Lyons","doi":"10.1075/LL.18025.LYO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a\n gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic\n landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is\n filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital\n remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary\n lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and\n elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big\n data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be\n viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let’s get phygital\",\"authors\":\"K. Lyons\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LL.18025.LYO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a\\n gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic\\n landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is\\n filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital\\n remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary\\n lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and\\n elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big\\n data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be\\n viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LL.18025.LYO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LL.18025.LYO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a
gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic
landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is
filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital
remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary
lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and
elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big
data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be
viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.