让我们开始数字化吧

IF 2.1 Q1 LINGUISTICS
K. Lyons
{"title":"让我们开始数字化吧","authors":"K. Lyons","doi":"10.1075/LL.18025.LYO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a\n gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic\n landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is\n filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital\n remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary\n lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and\n elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big\n data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be\n viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.","PeriodicalId":53129,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let’s get phygital\",\"authors\":\"K. Lyons\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LL.18025.LYO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a\\n gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic\\n landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is\\n filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital\\n remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary\\n lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and\\n elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big\\n data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be\\n viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LL.18025.LYO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Landscape-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LL.18025.LYO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文考虑了加州旧金山一个高绅化社区——教会区(Mission District)的物理和数字景观的相互作用。与最近关于语言景观的情感和人们调解的工作一致(Wee, 2016;Banda & Jimaima, 2015),我研究了在16,756个Instagram帖子的语料库中,使命是如何被过滤的——从字面上和比喻上。将这些数字修复的场所产品与物理景观进行比较,我展示了两者是如何沿着排他性的线进行符号学结构的。与数字/社交媒体的民主和包容神话相反,我展示了用户的自我定位和精英主义立场(Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009;地图,即将出版)有效地恢复特权,并重申特派团的高档化。随着“大数据”的挖掘越来越被视为经验上的“客观”信息,我的分析表明,地理标记的内容不应被视为一个静态指标,而应被视为一个主观的、动态的、有时有问题的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let’s get phygital
This paper considers the interplay of physical and digital landscaping in the Mission District (‘the Mission’), a gentrified neighborhood in San Francisco, California. Aligned with recent work on affect and people’s mediations of the linguistic landscape (Wee, 2016; Banda & Jimaima, 2015), I examine how the Mission is filtered – literally and figuratively – in a corpus of 16,756 Instagram posts. Comparing these digital remediated productions of place to the physical landscape, I demonstrate how both are structured semiotically along exclusionary lines. Contrary to the democratic and inclusive mythology of digital / social media, I show how users’ self-positionings and elitist stancetaking (Jaworski & Thurlow, 2009; Mapes, forthcoming) effectively reinscribe privilege and reiterate gentrification of the Mission. As mining of ‘big data’ becomes increasingly valued as empirically ‘objective’ information, my analysis demonstrates geotagged content should not be viewed as a static indicator, but as a subjective, dynamic and – at times – problematic process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信