民主与公民社会的革命起源

IF 0.6 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jerry Harris
{"title":"民主与公民社会的革命起源","authors":"Jerry Harris","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2022.2070973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Civil society and democratic rights resulted from a revolutionary compromise between the popular masses and rising capitalist class. This class alliance, which overthrew the aristocratic state in France and the colonial state in North America, produced a dialectic between property rights and human rights, constantly in contradiction and tension, but resulting in the political flexibility of capitalism. Such flexibility has been a major element in maintaining capitalist class hegemony when faced by social movements of race, class and gender. The bourgeoisie have always held private ownership of property as the supreme expression of democracy, while the working class has viewed social and political rights as primary. This contradiction can only be resolved by a socialist society, which places working class democracy and participation at the center of its historic project.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"19 1","pages":"179 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Revolutionary Origins of Democracy and Civil Society\",\"authors\":\"Jerry Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21598282.2022.2070973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n Civil society and democratic rights resulted from a revolutionary compromise between the popular masses and rising capitalist class. This class alliance, which overthrew the aristocratic state in France and the colonial state in North America, produced a dialectic between property rights and human rights, constantly in contradiction and tension, but resulting in the political flexibility of capitalism. Such flexibility has been a major element in maintaining capitalist class hegemony when faced by social movements of race, class and gender. The bourgeoisie have always held private ownership of property as the supreme expression of democracy, while the working class has viewed social and political rights as primary. This contradiction can only be resolved by a socialist society, which places working class democracy and participation at the center of its historic project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Critical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2070973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2022.2070973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民社会和民主权利是人民群众与崛起的资产阶级之间的革命性妥协的结果。这一阶级联盟推翻了法国的贵族国家和北美的殖民国家,在产权和人权之间产生了不断矛盾和紧张的辩证法,但却导致了资本主义的政治灵活性。在面对种族、阶级和性别的社会运动时,这种灵活性一直是维持资产阶级霸权的主要因素。资产阶级始终把财产私有制视为民主的最高表现,而工人阶级则把社会和政治权利视为首要权利。这一矛盾只能通过社会主义社会来解决,社会主义社会将工人阶级的民主和参与置于其历史计划的中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Revolutionary Origins of Democracy and Civil Society
ABSTRACT Civil society and democratic rights resulted from a revolutionary compromise between the popular masses and rising capitalist class. This class alliance, which overthrew the aristocratic state in France and the colonial state in North America, produced a dialectic between property rights and human rights, constantly in contradiction and tension, but resulting in the political flexibility of capitalism. Such flexibility has been a major element in maintaining capitalist class hegemony when faced by social movements of race, class and gender. The bourgeoisie have always held private ownership of property as the supreme expression of democracy, while the working class has viewed social and political rights as primary. This contradiction can only be resolved by a socialist society, which places working class democracy and participation at the center of its historic project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书