定量研究中的常见陷阱——家庭财富的游戏

Alison Loddick, Sheryl Mansfield
{"title":"定量研究中的常见陷阱——家庭财富的游戏","authors":"Alison Loddick, Sheryl Mansfield","doi":"10.21100/msor.v21i2.1407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common pitfalls in quantitative research were examined with two audiences using a GBL approach to support the engagement and interaction of participants. The researcher asked the UK mathematics and statistic community to determine the game's answers. This approach ignited an enthusiasm to discover the benefits, which was later delivered at the CETL/MSOR annual conference. The paper explores the design and delivery of the Game-based learning (GBL) session and evaluates how this action research can benefit teaching qualitative concepts in the future.","PeriodicalId":18932,"journal":{"name":"MSOR connections","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Pitfalls in Quantitative Research – A Game of Family fortunes\",\"authors\":\"Alison Loddick, Sheryl Mansfield\",\"doi\":\"10.21100/msor.v21i2.1407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Common pitfalls in quantitative research were examined with two audiences using a GBL approach to support the engagement and interaction of participants. The researcher asked the UK mathematics and statistic community to determine the game's answers. This approach ignited an enthusiasm to discover the benefits, which was later delivered at the CETL/MSOR annual conference. The paper explores the design and delivery of the Game-based learning (GBL) session and evaluates how this action research can benefit teaching qualitative concepts in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MSOR connections\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MSOR connections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v21i2.1407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSOR connections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21100/msor.v21i2.1407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量研究中常见的陷阱是用两个受众使用GBL方法来支持参与者的参与和互动。研究人员要求英国的数学和统计社区来确定游戏的答案。这种方法激发了人们发现好处的热情,后来在CETL/MSOR年度会议上发表了这一成果。本文探讨了基于游戏的学习(GBL)课程的设计和交付,并评估了这种行动研究如何有利于未来的定性概念教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common Pitfalls in Quantitative Research – A Game of Family fortunes
Common pitfalls in quantitative research were examined with two audiences using a GBL approach to support the engagement and interaction of participants. The researcher asked the UK mathematics and statistic community to determine the game's answers. This approach ignited an enthusiasm to discover the benefits, which was later delivered at the CETL/MSOR annual conference. The paper explores the design and delivery of the Game-based learning (GBL) session and evaluates how this action research can benefit teaching qualitative concepts in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信