基于谱的故障定位公式的理论、弱精度图和强精度图

C. M. Tang, W. Chan, Yuen-Tak Yu
{"title":"基于谱的故障定位公式的理论、弱精度图和强精度图","authors":"C. M. Tang, W. Chan, Yuen-Tak Yu","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driven by the need to know which spectrum-based fault localization techniques are more effective in locating faults, many studies have sought to compare the accuracy of different formulas used in these techniques, resulting in findings of both theoretical and empirical accuracy relations of these formulas. Theoretical accuracy relations are independent of the specific programs and other settings involved, but limited by underlying assumptions and manual work in proofs. An accuracy graph can be constructed to holistically represent the proved relations. On the other hand, empirical studies are free of specific theoretical assumptions and can be highly automatable and scalable. A recent study has developed a systematic methodology based on statistical tests to reveal consistent and statistically sound empirical accuracy relations. That work has demonstrated the merits of empirical accuracy graphs in revealing relations that can be hard to prove. In this paper, we propose to use a stronger criterion for comparing formulas, describe an exploratory experiment to construct accuracy graphs based on the criterion, and report interesting relations found from the resulting accuracy graphs.","PeriodicalId":6556,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"102 1","pages":"78-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical, Weak and Strong Accuracy Graphs of Spectrum-Based Fault Localization Formulas\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Tang, W. Chan, Yuen-Tak Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Driven by the need to know which spectrum-based fault localization techniques are more effective in locating faults, many studies have sought to compare the accuracy of different formulas used in these techniques, resulting in findings of both theoretical and empirical accuracy relations of these formulas. Theoretical accuracy relations are independent of the specific programs and other settings involved, but limited by underlying assumptions and manual work in proofs. An accuracy graph can be constructed to holistically represent the proved relations. On the other hand, empirical studies are free of specific theoretical assumptions and can be highly automatable and scalable. A recent study has developed a systematic methodology based on statistical tests to reveal consistent and statistically sound empirical accuracy relations. That work has demonstrated the merits of empirical accuracy graphs in revealing relations that can be hard to prove. In this paper, we propose to use a stronger criterion for comparing formulas, describe an exploratory experiment to construct accuracy graphs based on the criterion, and report interesting relations found from the resulting accuracy graphs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"78-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于需要知道哪种基于频谱的故障定位技术在故障定位方面更有效,许多研究试图比较这些技术中使用的不同公式的精度,结果发现了这些公式的理论和经验精度关系。理论精度关系独立于具体程序和其他涉及的设置,但受基本假设和证明中的手工工作的限制。可以构造一个精度图来整体地表示所证明的关系。另一方面,实证研究没有特定的理论假设,可以高度自动化和可扩展。最近的一项研究开发了一种基于统计测试的系统方法,以揭示一致和统计上合理的经验准确性关系。这项工作证明了经验精度图在揭示难以证明的关系方面的优点。在本文中,我们提出使用一个更强的标准来比较公式,描述了一个探索性实验,在此基础上构建精度图,并报告了从结果精度图中发现的有趣关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical, Weak and Strong Accuracy Graphs of Spectrum-Based Fault Localization Formulas
Driven by the need to know which spectrum-based fault localization techniques are more effective in locating faults, many studies have sought to compare the accuracy of different formulas used in these techniques, resulting in findings of both theoretical and empirical accuracy relations of these formulas. Theoretical accuracy relations are independent of the specific programs and other settings involved, but limited by underlying assumptions and manual work in proofs. An accuracy graph can be constructed to holistically represent the proved relations. On the other hand, empirical studies are free of specific theoretical assumptions and can be highly automatable and scalable. A recent study has developed a systematic methodology based on statistical tests to reveal consistent and statistically sound empirical accuracy relations. That work has demonstrated the merits of empirical accuracy graphs in revealing relations that can be hard to prove. In this paper, we propose to use a stronger criterion for comparing formulas, describe an exploratory experiment to construct accuracy graphs based on the criterion, and report interesting relations found from the resulting accuracy graphs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信