学生住房关系中的全包容与残障终端用户满意度:认知失调视角

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Elvis Attakora-Amaniampong, A. Miller, C. Tengan
{"title":"学生住房关系中的全包容与残障终端用户满意度:认知失调视角","authors":"Elvis Attakora-Amaniampong, A. Miller, C. Tengan","doi":"10.1108/hcs-08-2021-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDrawing on the social support role’s research gap of the cognitive dissonance theory, this study aims to assess the satisfaction of all-inclusiveness among student with disability (SWD) living in off-campus student housing in Ghana.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSWD satisfaction data were collected through survey among off-campus student housing in six public and private universities in Ghana. Using the universal building design requirements (UDRs), a confirmatory factor analysis and multivariate regression were used to determine UDRs satisfaction among SWD.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed that there exist 11 inbuilt and 9 externals UDRs among off-campus student housing in Ghana. The satisfaction level revealed that SWDs were satisfied with 5 out of the 11 inbuilt UDRs. Similarly, SWDs were satisfied with five out of nine external UDRs. Among them, only 50.5% off-campus student housing has slip-floor resistance in the buildings, which forms the highest availability among the inbuilt UDRs. Total, 33% of student housing has a clear signage, which was the highest among the external UDRs. These provided some psychological effects on SWD across the study locations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study seeks to encourage the adherence to the implementation of universal building design regulations and the review of structural design and permitting process in ensuring all-inclusiveness and compliance among student housing investors in Ghana.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study uniquely contributes to the body of knowledge on all-inclusiveness among students with disability in off-campus student housing studies through the expansion of the frontiers of the social support discourse of cognitive dissonance theory in the housing subsector. Again, this study deviates from health and legal studies associated to disabilities in Ghana.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All-inclusiveness and disability end-user satisfaction in student housing nexus: cognitive dissonance perspective\",\"authors\":\"Elvis Attakora-Amaniampong, A. Miller, C. Tengan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hcs-08-2021-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nDrawing on the social support role’s research gap of the cognitive dissonance theory, this study aims to assess the satisfaction of all-inclusiveness among student with disability (SWD) living in off-campus student housing in Ghana.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nSWD satisfaction data were collected through survey among off-campus student housing in six public and private universities in Ghana. Using the universal building design requirements (UDRs), a confirmatory factor analysis and multivariate regression were used to determine UDRs satisfaction among SWD.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results showed that there exist 11 inbuilt and 9 externals UDRs among off-campus student housing in Ghana. The satisfaction level revealed that SWDs were satisfied with 5 out of the 11 inbuilt UDRs. Similarly, SWDs were satisfied with five out of nine external UDRs. Among them, only 50.5% off-campus student housing has slip-floor resistance in the buildings, which forms the highest availability among the inbuilt UDRs. Total, 33% of student housing has a clear signage, which was the highest among the external UDRs. These provided some psychological effects on SWD across the study locations.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study seeks to encourage the adherence to the implementation of universal building design regulations and the review of structural design and permitting process in ensuring all-inclusiveness and compliance among student housing investors in Ghana.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study uniquely contributes to the body of knowledge on all-inclusiveness among students with disability in off-campus student housing studies through the expansion of the frontiers of the social support discourse of cognitive dissonance theory in the housing subsector. Again, this study deviates from health and legal studies associated to disabilities in Ghana.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-08-2021-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-08-2021-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的借鉴认知失调理论中社会支持角色的研究缺口,评估加纳校外学生公寓中残疾学生对全包容的满意度。设计/方法/方法通过对加纳六所公立和私立大学的校外学生住房进行调查,收集了社会福利署满意度数据。采用通用建筑设计要求(udr),采用验证性因子分析和多元回归分析来确定社会福利机构对udr的满意度。结果表明:加纳校外学生住房中存在11个内置udr和9个外部udr。满意程度显示,社署署长对11个内置udr中的5个表示满意。同样,社工对9个外部udr中的5个感到满意。其中,只有50.5%的校外学生公寓具有建筑物的防滑地板,这在内置udr中形成了最高的可用性。总共有33%的学生公寓有清晰的标识,这在外部udr中是最高的。这些因素对整个研究地点的社工产生了一些心理影响。实际意义本研究旨在鼓励遵守通用建筑设计法规的实施,审查结构设计和许可程序,以确保加纳学生住房投资者的包容性和合规性。独创性/价值本研究通过拓展认知失调理论的社会支持话语在住房子领域的前沿,独特地为校外学生住房研究中残疾学生的全包容性知识体系做出了贡献。同样,这项研究偏离了与加纳残疾有关的健康和法律研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
All-inclusiveness and disability end-user satisfaction in student housing nexus: cognitive dissonance perspective
Purpose Drawing on the social support role’s research gap of the cognitive dissonance theory, this study aims to assess the satisfaction of all-inclusiveness among student with disability (SWD) living in off-campus student housing in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach SWD satisfaction data were collected through survey among off-campus student housing in six public and private universities in Ghana. Using the universal building design requirements (UDRs), a confirmatory factor analysis and multivariate regression were used to determine UDRs satisfaction among SWD. Findings The results showed that there exist 11 inbuilt and 9 externals UDRs among off-campus student housing in Ghana. The satisfaction level revealed that SWDs were satisfied with 5 out of the 11 inbuilt UDRs. Similarly, SWDs were satisfied with five out of nine external UDRs. Among them, only 50.5% off-campus student housing has slip-floor resistance in the buildings, which forms the highest availability among the inbuilt UDRs. Total, 33% of student housing has a clear signage, which was the highest among the external UDRs. These provided some psychological effects on SWD across the study locations. Practical implications This study seeks to encourage the adherence to the implementation of universal building design regulations and the review of structural design and permitting process in ensuring all-inclusiveness and compliance among student housing investors in Ghana. Originality/value This study uniquely contributes to the body of knowledge on all-inclusiveness among students with disability in off-campus student housing studies through the expansion of the frontiers of the social support discourse of cognitive dissonance theory in the housing subsector. Again, this study deviates from health and legal studies associated to disabilities in Ghana.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信