有证据表明肉桂醛会引起过敏性接触性皮炎吗?

J. Hostynek,
{"title":"有证据表明肉桂醛会引起过敏性接触性皮炎吗?","authors":"J. Hostynek,","doi":"10.1159/000085456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fragrance material amylcinnamic aldehyde (ACA) has been cited as a frequent cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). A review of the literature shows that when the underlying clinical and experimental data are analyzed, a clear cause-effect relationship has infrequently or rarely been established. On the basis of the generally weak sensitizing potential of this substance coupled with its generally low exposure conditions, the prevalence of clinical cases would not be expected to be particularly high. This is not to say that ACA is a frequent inducer of low-intensity but subclinical, type IV allergy in members of the public. It remains to be seen however, how often such allergy, once established, is responsible for any of the cases of ACD commonly ascribed in the literature. Indeed, in some cases, patch test conditions may not be optimal for differentiating between clinically relevant and irrelevant allergy to ACA.","PeriodicalId":12086,"journal":{"name":"Exogenous Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is There Evidence that Amylcinnamic Aldehyde Causes Allergic Contact Dermatitis?\",\"authors\":\"J. Hostynek,\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000085456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The fragrance material amylcinnamic aldehyde (ACA) has been cited as a frequent cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). A review of the literature shows that when the underlying clinical and experimental data are analyzed, a clear cause-effect relationship has infrequently or rarely been established. On the basis of the generally weak sensitizing potential of this substance coupled with its generally low exposure conditions, the prevalence of clinical cases would not be expected to be particularly high. This is not to say that ACA is a frequent inducer of low-intensity but subclinical, type IV allergy in members of the public. It remains to be seen however, how often such allergy, once established, is responsible for any of the cases of ACD commonly ascribed in the literature. Indeed, in some cases, patch test conditions may not be optimal for differentiating between clinically relevant and irrelevant allergy to ACA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exogenous Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exogenous Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000085456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exogenous Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000085456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

芳香物质淀粉肉桂醛(ACA)被认为是过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的常见原因。对文献的回顾表明,当分析潜在的临床和实验数据时,很少或很少建立明确的因果关系。鉴于该物质的致敏潜力普遍较弱,再加上其暴露条件普遍较低,预计临床病例的发生率不会特别高。这并不是说ACA是公众中低强度但亚临床的IV型过敏的常见诱因。然而,这种过敏一旦确定,在文献中通常被认为是ACD病例的原因,其频率还有待观察。事实上,在某些情况下,斑贴试验条件可能不是鉴别ACA临床相关和不相关过敏的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is There Evidence that Amylcinnamic Aldehyde Causes Allergic Contact Dermatitis?
The fragrance material amylcinnamic aldehyde (ACA) has been cited as a frequent cause of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). A review of the literature shows that when the underlying clinical and experimental data are analyzed, a clear cause-effect relationship has infrequently or rarely been established. On the basis of the generally weak sensitizing potential of this substance coupled with its generally low exposure conditions, the prevalence of clinical cases would not be expected to be particularly high. This is not to say that ACA is a frequent inducer of low-intensity but subclinical, type IV allergy in members of the public. It remains to be seen however, how often such allergy, once established, is responsible for any of the cases of ACD commonly ascribed in the literature. Indeed, in some cases, patch test conditions may not be optimal for differentiating between clinically relevant and irrelevant allergy to ACA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信