正义的技巧:杜波依斯的数据肖像与种族的视觉化问题

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
MELUS Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI:10.1093/melus/mlab031
Katherine Fusco, Lynda C. Olman
{"title":"正义的技巧:杜波依斯的数据肖像与种族的视觉化问题","authors":"Katherine Fusco, Lynda C. Olman","doi":"10.1093/melus/mlab031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heralded by the 2014 special issue of MELUS on race and visual culture, African American literary studies have pivoted toward this subject, and for good reason, as practices of looking are fundamental to the construction of race. Shawn Michelle Smith, the editor of this special issue, argues for a shift from studies of representation, customary to literary scholars, to studies of the gaze and other visual practices. She challenges scholars of multi-ethnic studies to “not ask what does race look like but how are racialized subjects produced through practices of looking” (“Guest” 8). In other words, Smith argues for treating race not as a static object that needs to be seen more clearly but rather as a mode of seeing. While this shift in focus is critical for all authors and eras, it is particularly fruitful for those that have thus far been treated primarily from literary or historical angles. Few authors are riper for this kind of reanalysis than W. E. B. Du Bois, whose data visualizations have recently been released in a volume edited by Whitney Battle-Baptiste and Brit Rusert and who, as Smith points out, was very astute on the subject of race and the gaze. Smith argues that Du Bois’s famous conception of racial “double-consciousness” rested on an explicitly visual practice: “For Du Bois, learning to see oneself refracted through the lens of a dominant white gaze also enabled one to unsettle the authority of that gaze and to learn to see differently with what he called ‘second-sight’” (3). Accordingly, scholars have begun work on Du Bois’s contributions to the visual arts, particularly his editorial work on the covers of The Crisis and the photographic portraits from the 1900 Paris Exposition. However, as Smith points out, many studies have focused more on representations of race than racialization","PeriodicalId":44959,"journal":{"name":"MELUS","volume":"46 1","pages":"159 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techniques of Justice: W. E. B. Du Bois's Data Portraits and the Problem of Visualizing the Race\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Fusco, Lynda C. Olman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/melus/mlab031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heralded by the 2014 special issue of MELUS on race and visual culture, African American literary studies have pivoted toward this subject, and for good reason, as practices of looking are fundamental to the construction of race. Shawn Michelle Smith, the editor of this special issue, argues for a shift from studies of representation, customary to literary scholars, to studies of the gaze and other visual practices. She challenges scholars of multi-ethnic studies to “not ask what does race look like but how are racialized subjects produced through practices of looking” (“Guest” 8). In other words, Smith argues for treating race not as a static object that needs to be seen more clearly but rather as a mode of seeing. While this shift in focus is critical for all authors and eras, it is particularly fruitful for those that have thus far been treated primarily from literary or historical angles. Few authors are riper for this kind of reanalysis than W. E. B. Du Bois, whose data visualizations have recently been released in a volume edited by Whitney Battle-Baptiste and Brit Rusert and who, as Smith points out, was very astute on the subject of race and the gaze. Smith argues that Du Bois’s famous conception of racial “double-consciousness” rested on an explicitly visual practice: “For Du Bois, learning to see oneself refracted through the lens of a dominant white gaze also enabled one to unsettle the authority of that gaze and to learn to see differently with what he called ‘second-sight’” (3). Accordingly, scholars have begun work on Du Bois’s contributions to the visual arts, particularly his editorial work on the covers of The Crisis and the photographic portraits from the 1900 Paris Exposition. However, as Smith points out, many studies have focused more on representations of race than racialization\",\"PeriodicalId\":44959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MELUS\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"159 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MELUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlab031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlab031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2014年《MELUS》关于种族和视觉文化的特刊预示着,非裔美国文学研究已经转向了这个主题,而且有充分的理由,因为观看的实践是种族建构的基础。本期特刊的编辑肖恩·米歇尔·史密斯(Shawn Michelle Smith)主张从研究文学学者习惯的再现转向研究凝视和其他视觉实践。她向研究多民族的学者提出挑战,“不要问种族是什么样子的,而要问种族化的主体是如何通过观察的实践产生的”(“Guest”8)。换句话说,史密斯主张不要把种族当作一个需要更清楚地看到的静态对象,而是作为一种观察的模式。虽然这种焦点的转变对所有作家和时代都至关重要,但对于那些迄今为止主要从文学或历史角度看待的人来说,它尤其富有成效。很少有作家比w·e·b·杜波依斯更适合这种再分析,他的数据可视化最近在惠特尼·巴特-巴蒂斯特和布里特·鲁塞特编辑的一卷书中发布,正如史密斯指出的那样,杜波依斯对种族和凝视的主题非常敏锐。史密斯认为,杜波依斯著名的种族“双重意识”概念建立在一种明确的视觉实践之上:“对杜波依斯来说,学会透过白人凝视的透镜折射自己,也使一个人能够打破这种凝视的权威,并学会用他所谓的‘第二眼’来看待不同的东西”(3)。因此,学者们开始研究杜波依斯对视觉艺术的贡献,特别是他对《危机》封面的编辑工作和1900年巴黎博览会的摄影肖像。然而,正如史密斯指出的那样,许多研究更多地关注种族的表现,而不是种族化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techniques of Justice: W. E. B. Du Bois's Data Portraits and the Problem of Visualizing the Race
Heralded by the 2014 special issue of MELUS on race and visual culture, African American literary studies have pivoted toward this subject, and for good reason, as practices of looking are fundamental to the construction of race. Shawn Michelle Smith, the editor of this special issue, argues for a shift from studies of representation, customary to literary scholars, to studies of the gaze and other visual practices. She challenges scholars of multi-ethnic studies to “not ask what does race look like but how are racialized subjects produced through practices of looking” (“Guest” 8). In other words, Smith argues for treating race not as a static object that needs to be seen more clearly but rather as a mode of seeing. While this shift in focus is critical for all authors and eras, it is particularly fruitful for those that have thus far been treated primarily from literary or historical angles. Few authors are riper for this kind of reanalysis than W. E. B. Du Bois, whose data visualizations have recently been released in a volume edited by Whitney Battle-Baptiste and Brit Rusert and who, as Smith points out, was very astute on the subject of race and the gaze. Smith argues that Du Bois’s famous conception of racial “double-consciousness” rested on an explicitly visual practice: “For Du Bois, learning to see oneself refracted through the lens of a dominant white gaze also enabled one to unsettle the authority of that gaze and to learn to see differently with what he called ‘second-sight’” (3). Accordingly, scholars have begun work on Du Bois’s contributions to the visual arts, particularly his editorial work on the covers of The Crisis and the photographic portraits from the 1900 Paris Exposition. However, as Smith points out, many studies have focused more on representations of race than racialization
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MELUS
MELUS LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信