Geocoder在非结构化Tweet位置上性能的比较研究

Q3 Social Sciences
H. N. Serere, Umut Nefta Kanilmaz, Sruthi Ketineni, Bernd Resch
{"title":"Geocoder在非结构化Tweet位置上性能的比较研究","authors":"H. N. Serere, Umut Nefta Kanilmaz, Sruthi Ketineni, Bernd Resch","doi":"10.1553/giscience2023_01_s110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geocoding is a process of converting human-readable addresses into latitude and longitude points. Whilst most geocoders tend to perform well on structured addresses, their performance drops significantly in the presence of unstructured addresses, such as locations written in informal language. In this paper, we make an extensive comparison of geocoder performance on unstructured location mentions within tweets. Using nine geocoders and a worldwide English-language Twitter dataset, we compare the geocoders’ recall, precision, consensus and bias values. As in previous similar studies, Google Maps showed the highest overall performance. However, with the exception of Google Maps, we found that geocoders which use open data have higher performance than those which do not. The open-data geocoders showed the least per-continent bias and the highest consensus with Google Maps. These results suggest the possibility of improving geocoder performance on unstructured locations by extending or enhancing the quality of openly available datasets.","PeriodicalId":29645,"journal":{"name":"GI_Forum","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Geocoder Performance on Unstructured Tweet Locations\",\"authors\":\"H. N. Serere, Umut Nefta Kanilmaz, Sruthi Ketineni, Bernd Resch\",\"doi\":\"10.1553/giscience2023_01_s110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geocoding is a process of converting human-readable addresses into latitude and longitude points. Whilst most geocoders tend to perform well on structured addresses, their performance drops significantly in the presence of unstructured addresses, such as locations written in informal language. In this paper, we make an extensive comparison of geocoder performance on unstructured location mentions within tweets. Using nine geocoders and a worldwide English-language Twitter dataset, we compare the geocoders’ recall, precision, consensus and bias values. As in previous similar studies, Google Maps showed the highest overall performance. However, with the exception of Google Maps, we found that geocoders which use open data have higher performance than those which do not. The open-data geocoders showed the least per-continent bias and the highest consensus with Google Maps. These results suggest the possibility of improving geocoder performance on unstructured locations by extending or enhancing the quality of openly available datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GI_Forum\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GI_Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2023_01_s110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GI_Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2023_01_s110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地理编码是将人类可读的地址转换为纬度和经度点的过程。虽然大多数地理编码器倾向于在结构化地址上表现良好,但在非结构化地址(例如用非正式语言写的位置)的存在下,它们的性能会显著下降。在本文中,我们对地理编码器在tweet中非结构化位置提及的性能进行了广泛的比较。使用9个地理编码器和一个全球英语Twitter数据集,我们比较了地理编码器的召回率、精度、共识和偏差值。与之前的类似研究一样,谷歌地图显示出最高的整体表现。然而,除了谷歌地图之外,我们发现使用开放数据的地理编码器比不使用开放数据的地理编码器具有更高的性能。开放数据地理编码器显示出最小的大陆偏差,与谷歌地图的一致性最高。这些结果表明,通过扩展或提高公开可用数据集的质量,可以提高地理编码器在非结构化位置上的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of Geocoder Performance on Unstructured Tweet Locations
Geocoding is a process of converting human-readable addresses into latitude and longitude points. Whilst most geocoders tend to perform well on structured addresses, their performance drops significantly in the presence of unstructured addresses, such as locations written in informal language. In this paper, we make an extensive comparison of geocoder performance on unstructured location mentions within tweets. Using nine geocoders and a worldwide English-language Twitter dataset, we compare the geocoders’ recall, precision, consensus and bias values. As in previous similar studies, Google Maps showed the highest overall performance. However, with the exception of Google Maps, we found that geocoders which use open data have higher performance than those which do not. The open-data geocoders showed the least per-continent bias and the highest consensus with Google Maps. These results suggest the possibility of improving geocoder performance on unstructured locations by extending or enhancing the quality of openly available datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GI_Forum
GI_Forum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信